Advanced Search Results

M/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION234 IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-A. 6 W.P.NOs.6918-6938/2014: BETWEEN:1. … INDIA REP. BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY4MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI- 110001.2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS AAYKAR BHAVAN, SECTOR-3, VAISHALI, … (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3, VAISHALI GHAZIABAD, UP- 201 010.2. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND TO HOLD THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION234 OF THE ACT AS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3476-3479/2014

M/S. Vadakkancheri Grama Panchayath vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

the following prayers:“(a) To declare that section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as inserted by the Finance Act 2012, making a person liable to pay, by way of fee, a sum of Rs. 200/- for every day … INDIA NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2 CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3 COMMISSIONER

Ags Entertainment Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

and proposed to exempt the Industry from service tax on Copyrights relating to recording of Cinematograph films. The Finance Act, 2012 introduced Section 66B as the new Charging Section with effect from 1.7.2012 for the levy of service tax … Petitioner vs. 1.Union of India, Secretary Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Central Board of Excise and Customs, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 3.The Commissioner of Service Tax, MHU Complex, No.692,

Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Circular No.148/17/2011-ST alone becomes otiose and in this context the impugned circular is liable to be quashed.46. The Finance Act, 2012 has completely revamped the service tax regime. Under the new service tax regime, as per Section 66D, all … Delhi. 2.Central Board of Excise and Customs, North Block, New Delhi  110 001. 3.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, 26/1, Mahathma … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs,

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

CJI1 Leave granted. BRIEF BACKGROUND:2. In the present batch of cases, the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and of the rules framed in consonance has been assailed. While it would be repetitious to reproduce … formulation of core issues arising for adjudication.3. The Madras Bar Association has preferred Writ Petition (Civil) No.267 of 2012 seeking the following reliefs:1. “i. A writ of mandamus, directing the Union of India, to implement the directions … From the compilation of the learned Attorney General, it appears that the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, the Armed Forces Tribunal, the … Emphasis was placed on the wordings of Article 110 which allows those bills which contain “only” provisions … petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

B. Rajan vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS SERVICE TAX KOLLAM DIVISION VARINJAM TOWERS SRI. SREELAL N WARRIER, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING … not come within the purview of auxiliary service or taxable service as defined under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, and is consequently not a taxable service within the meaning of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act,

Khader T.M vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS SERVICE TAX KOLLAM DIVISION VARINJAM TOWERS SRI. SREELAL N WARRIER, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING … not come within the purview of auxiliary service or taxable service as defined under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, and is consequently not a taxable service within the meaning of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act,

J.K.Enterprises vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS SERVICE TAX KOLLAM DIVISION VARINJAM TOWERS SRI. SREELAL N WARRIER, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING … not come within the purview of auxiliary service or taxable service as defined under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, and is consequently not a taxable service within the meaning of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act,

Habeebulla S vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS SERVICE TAX KOLLAM DIVISION VARINJAM TOWERS SRI. SREELAL N WARRIER, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING … not come within the purview of auxiliary service or taxable service as defined under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, and is consequently not a taxable service within the meaning of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act,

S. Shanmugha Sundaram vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS SERVICE TAX KOLLAM DIVISION VARINJAM TOWERS SRI. SREELAL N WARRIER, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING … not come within the purview of auxiliary service or taxable service as defined under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, and is consequently not a taxable service within the meaning of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act,