Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2012 central section 104 · Page 1 of about 271 results (0.118 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 27 2025

Radhika Agarwal versus Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-2025

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.1331

Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act).Headnotes† Customs Act, 1962 - Finance Act, 2012 - Finance Act, 2013 - Finance Act, 2019 - ss.104(4), 104(6) - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, … 2013; Central Excise Act, 1944; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.List of Keywords Section 104(4), 104(6) of Customs Act, 1962; Finance Act, 2012; Finance Act, 2019; Finance Act, 2013; Section 132 of Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2015

M/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-12-2015

Subject : Education

227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION234 IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-A. 6 W.P.NOs.6918-6938/2014: BETWEEN:1. … AS ANNEXURE-A. BEING W.P.NOs.19398-19399/2014: BETWEEN: SYNDICATE BANK TAX CELL, HEAD OFFICE, MANIPAL-576 104 REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER MR R RAMALINGAM. ... PETITIONER (BY … (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3, VAISHALI GHAZIABAD, UP- 201 010.2. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND TO HOLD THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION234 OF THE ACT AS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3476-3479/2014

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2021

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2021

Subject : Direct Taxation

he submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also not … royalty contained in explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi). Further, he referred to Circular No.10/2002 dated 09.10.2002 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“CBDT”]. in which “remittance for royalties” and “remittance for supply of articles or…computer software” … non-residents, it is proposed to make certain provisions in the Income-tax Act 104 clearly specifying the circumstances in which such income shall be deemed to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Aids to interpretation (i) History of the legislation 107. The amendments (i.e. Finance Act 2008, Finance Act 2009, Finance Act 2012 and Finance Act 2015) do not throw light - by way of statement of objects and reasons or … the taxable territories to charitable purposes which tend to promote international welfare in which India is interested, the Central Board of Revenue may, by general or special order, direct that it shall not be included in the … 1922 Act did not contain any words of restriction, in the definition 104 "(4A) Sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) or sub-section (3A) … The judgment in Thanthi Trust .................................................................................................................. 18 F. Deletion of certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2023

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-02-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court in the case of Rojer Mathew (supra) considered the question, as to whether Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017, which does not prescribe qualifications, appointment, term and conditions of service, salary and allowances, etc. suffers from … submitted that the material with regard to such factors cannot be considered overnight. It is submitted that the 2012 White Paper on Black Money throws light on the complexity of the problem. The information and data gathered … November 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned Notification”), issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section … the statute”. A reference to what has been stated in Stroud's Judicial 104 Dictionary Vol. I, is revealing inasmuch as the import of the word

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2026

Sri. Karibasavaraj Badami vs the Deputy Registrar of Societies

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Jan-27-2026

an instrumentality of the State. Reliance was placed on the judgment of this Court in S.Shobha v. Muthoot Finance Ltd4, wherein it was held that a writ petition is maintainable only against a body that qualifies as … Apex Court has in a catena of rulings consistently held that the central theme that requires to be looked into and ascertained is, as to … : 2 SCEC 1] the learned counsel - 104 -contended that even assuming that the appellant's writ … since reliefs have been sought against Respondent No. 2, which is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act and Respondent No.3 to 7 are private individuals. Though the Deputy Registrar of Society has been made as … To overcome the difficulties, Lord Gardiner (the Lord Chancellor) in pursuance of Section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commission Act, 1965, requested the Law Commission "to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S. Ganesh Shankar Environmental Solutions vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … tax. Accordingly, unless the service is one that falls in the - 104 - negative list or a notification of exemption, the same would fall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S Neelanjana Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … tax. Accordingly, unless the service is one that falls in the - 104 - negative list or a notification of exemption, the same would fall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M Soma Reddy vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … tax. Accordingly, unless the service is one that falls in the - 104 - negative list or a notification of exemption, the same would fall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S Shodashi Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … tax. Accordingly, unless the service is one that falls in the - 104 - negative list or a notification of exemption, the same would fall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial