Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Salem Municipal Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Centra ...
Chennai
Mar-05-2013
Service Tax
: Rs.22,39,370.00 3. According to the petitioner, the respondent has wrongly interpreted Section 11(A)(1) of the Central Excise Act and Section 73(1) of the Finance … Service Tax was introduced on renting of immovable property service with effect from 01.6.2007 by the amendment of Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act, 2007. Further by the amendment in the year 2010, certain other immovable properties were … the category of "Renting of Immovable Property Service" during the period from 1st June 2007 to 31st March 2011 and failed to file mandatory half yearly returns in the Form of ST-3. An amount of Rs.79,33,135/- and … The Commissioner Salem Municipal Corporation Salem. .. Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise O/o. Commissioner of Central Excise No.1, Foulks Compound Anai Road, Sale”001.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnataka Power Transmission Corporation Vs. M/s Shamanur Sugars Limit ...
Karnataka
May-22-2023
Education
to be made by the Commission involves a very highly technical procedure, requiring working knowledge of law, engineering, finance, commerce, economics and management, It would be more appropriate and effective if a statutory appeal is provided to … 15 MWs. The PPA was for 10 years and expired in September 2011. After expiry of PPA of the year 1998, 1st respondent had sought … 4TH MAIN P.J.EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE KARNATAKA-577 002. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, 2. CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATION COMMISSION - 2 - WP No.46495 of 2012 3RD & … and functions of the SLDC are now sought to be curtailed by CERC in exercise of powers under Section 79 of the Act. 7.23. In support thereof, he relies on the decision in the case of Godawari Power
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India
Chennai
Jun-20-2014
Service Tax
by Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance New Delhi 2 The Commissioner Central Excise and Service Tax Gobichettipalayam 3 The Gobichettipalayam Municipality represented by its … of India, seeking a writ of declaration, declaring the provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as ultra vires and unconstitutional and unenforceable. For petitioner in W.P.No.16400/2013 Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For RR1& 2 in … the following judgments: i [2011].37 VST46(P & H).Shubh Timb Steels Limited v. Union of India and another; ii 2011 (22) STR257(Ori.).Utkal Builders Limited versus Union of India; iii 2012 (25) STR231(M.P.).Entertainment World Developers Limited versus Union of … Court in Home Solutions-I case, the impugned notice is unsustainable in law. 79 This Court, following the decision rendered by the Full Bench of Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Haryana Power Purchase Centre Vs. Sasan Power Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Apr-06-2023
Land Acquisition
S (3) It was decided to set up an Ultra Mega Power Project. Towards this end, the Power Finance Corporation Limited of India was to be the nodal agency. It incorporated a Special Purpose Vehicle, which is … of Power Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi marg, New Delhi, the 17th June, 2011 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Sub:3960. MW Sasan Ultra Mega Power Project, Distt. Singrauli - … the Tribunal, in turn, was lodged against the order passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘Commission’ for brevity). The Commission … Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘Commission’ for brevity). The Commission passed the order purporting to be one under Section 79(b) inter alia of the Act in a petition filed by the first respondent. F A C T S
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.1mg Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & ...
Delhi
Jul-08-2019
Right to Information
the e-commerce Question platforms are “intermediaries” and are entitled to the protection of the safe harbour provision under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act and the Intermediary Guidelines of 2011?. Question (iv) - Whether e-commerce platforms such … & 91/2019 Page 76 of 225 1968]. (hereinafter, ‗Zalam Singh‘), and Delhi International Airport Ltd. v. International Lease Finance Corporation and Ors. (2015) 8 SCC446(hereinafter, ‗DIAL v. ILFC‘).141. Ld. ASG has also handed over to the Court … IDS or Barcodes. Amazon Boost -management of day to day seller‟s central operation for optimizing sales. Amazon Choice - This is an automated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-02-2021
Direct Taxation
he submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also … royalty contained in explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi). Further, he referred to Circular No.10/2002 dated 09.10.2002 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“CBDT”]. in which “remittance for royalties” and “remittance for supply of articles or…computer software” … to the vendor, the transaction may not be regarded as a loan 79 transaction, even though the reason for which it was entered into was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPtc India Limited Vs. Jaiprakash Power Ventures Ltd.
Delhi
May-15-2012
Land Acquisition
included the power to ‘determine’. Referring to the decision in Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Limited (2011) 5 SCC 53 it was submitted that disputes where rights in rem were involved were not … of four units of 250 MW each. On 31st March 2003, the Central Electricity Authority (‘CEA’) under Section 4(b) of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 … 1. In this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act’) PTC India Limited, the Petitioner, has challenged the impugned majority … of the tariff in respect of the four categories of cases specified in Section 62(1) and not under Section 79(1)(a) and (b) and Section 86(1)(a) of the EA. It was held that the provisions of Section 79(1) (a)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEbiz.Com Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Sep-01-2016
Service Tax
on 19th and 21st January 2016 by the DGCEI are illegal and ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 ( FA ). Respondent No. 3 was impleaded pursuant to the order dated 28th January, 2016 passed … ), directed againstUnion of India (Respondent No. 1), the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence ('DGCEI - Respondent No. 2) and the Commissioner Audit-II of … arrest under Section 90 (1) of the FA. 79. The Court notes that the Bombay High Court … ST-3 returns from April 2009 to March 2012; copies of balance sheets from Assessment Year (AY) 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 and the trial balance for 2012-2013; a file containing miscellaneous papers and two brochures. Summons were issued on … late in the evening at 7:40 pm on 20th January 2016 under Section 91 of the FA and sent to judicial custody. It was alleged
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPtc India Ltd. Vs Jaypee Karcham Hydro Corporation .
Delhi
Aug-13-2010
Land Acquisition
The appellant company has been granted license to trade in electricity by Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as "CERC") under Section 14 of … Rs. 7,080.38 crores. The respondent also sought final capital cost and/or tariff for the project in view of Section 79 (i) (b) r/w Section 185 of the Act.11 The prayers made by the respondent in the said petition … E of the PPA. The appellant has to pay tariff on the capital cost and the means of finances as approved by CERC and determination of tariff was subject to approval of the appropriate commission under the … capital cost which admittedly, according to the appellant, is on 17th November, 2011.17. The appellant also relied on an order dated 11th January, 2010 passed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-2016
Service Tax
tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … were proposed to be imposed on the petitioner. 11. The petitioner filed an elaborate reply dated 1st August, 2011 to the show cause notice inter alia raising the following contentions:- (i) The activities of repair, alteration, renovation … on 22nd February, 2016 and directed that it be heard along with Central Excise Appeal No. 21 of 2015. 2. Rule on interim relief in … of Income Tax vs. Shaw Wallace and Co. (AIR 1932 SC 138). 79. The second submission of Mr. Sridharan is that the term road is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »