Advanced Search Results

The Commissioner of Central Excise, vs Trans Asian Shipping Service Pv ...

Court : Kerala

under the provisions of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with proviso to Section 78(1) of Finance Act, 1994.(ii) the amount of Rs.23 04,355/(Rupees Twenty Three Lakhs Four Thousand. Three Hundred and Fifty Five Only) paid … been entered by the Tribunal without going into the records as done by the Commissioner for the period 2011 to 2012. In view of the -20- above, we are of the considered opinion that the order of … FINAL ORDER 21353/2018 IN APPEAL ST/1252/2010 OF CESTAT BANGALORE)APPELLANT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, (NOW PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AND

The Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Trans Asian Shipping Servi ...

Court : Kerala

under the provisions of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with proviso to Section 78(1) of Finance Act, 1994.(ii) the amount of Rs.23 04,355/(Rupees Twenty Three Lakhs Four Thousand. Three Hundred and Fifty Five Only) paid … been entered by the Tribunal without going into the records as done by the Commissioner for the period 2011 to 2012. In view of the -20- above, we are of the considered opinion that the order of … FINAL ORDER 21353/2018 IN APPEAL ST/1252/2010 OF CESTAT BANGALORE)APPELLANT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, (NOW PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AND

The Commissioner of Central Excise, vs Trans Asian Shipping Services P ...

Court : Kerala

under the provisions of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with proviso to Section 78(1) of Finance Act, 1994.(ii) the amount of Rs.23 04,355/(Rupees Twenty Three Lakhs Four Thousand. Three Hundred and Fifty Five Only) paid … been entered by the Tribunal without going into the records as done by the Commissioner for the period 2011 to 2012. In view of the -20- above, we are of the considered opinion that the order of … FINAL ORDER 21353/2018 IN APPEAL ST/1252/2010 OF CESTAT BANGALORE)APPELLANT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, (NOW PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AND

The Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S.Trans Asian Shipping Servic ...

Court : Kerala

under the provisions of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with proviso to Section 78(1) of Finance Act, 1994.(ii) the amount of Rs.23 04,355/(Rupees Twenty Three Lakhs Four Thousand. Three Hundred and Fifty Five Only) paid … been entered by the Tribunal without going into the records as done by the Commissioner for the period 2011 to 2012. In view of the -20- above, we are of the considered opinion that the order of … FINAL ORDER 21353/2018 IN APPEAL ST/1252/2010 OF CESTAT BANGALORE)APPELLANT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, (NOW PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AND

M/S. Inox Air Products Ltd. Vs. Cce, Hyderabad

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

under sub-rule 4 of Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 by the adjudicating authority was reviewed in the Department and accordingly an appeal preferred to the Commissioner(Appeals). … should not be recovered under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules read with proviso to Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 and the credit reversed amount to Rs.4,98,899/- should not be adjusted towards the amount demanded.

Principal Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi €“II Vs ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

second proviso to Section 11 AC of the CE Act as it stood prior to its substitution by Finance Act, 2011 and to Section 11 AC (1) (c) as it stood after such substitution. Section 11AC of the CE … the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CE Act) read with Section 83 of the Finance … benefit of payment of reduced penalty to the extent of 25% in terms of the 3rd proviso to Section 78 (1) of the Finance Act 1994 (as it stood prior to its substitution by the Finance Act 2015)

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

by Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance New Delhi 2 The Commissioner Central Excise and Service Tax Gobichettipalayam 3 The Gobichettipalayam Municipality represented by its … has been confirmed with consequential interest and penalties under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. 39 The learned Senior Counsel appearing for … of India, seeking a writ of declaration, declaring the provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as ultra vires and unconstitutional and unenforceable. For petitioner in W.P.No.16400/2013 Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For RR1& 2 in … the following judgments: i [2011].37 VST46(P & H).Shubh Timb Steels Limited v. Union of India and another; ii 2011 (22) STR257(Ori.).Utkal Builders Limited versus Union of India; iii 2012 (25) STR231(M.P.).Entertainment World Developers Limited versus Union of

Cce., Ahmedabad Vs. M/S. Om Sai Engg Works and Others

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Service Tax

3, and 5 of the above Table, the original adjudicating authority imposed penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the respondents for evasion of service tax during the said … to pay service tax for these periods. Show cause notices were issued to them in the year 2010/ 2011 by invoking extended period of time limitation. In the case at S. No. 1, 2, 3, and 5 … Ltd. Vs. CCE, Cal.-II [1998 (102) ELT 705 (Tribunal)]; (b). Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore Vs. ELGI Equipments Ltd. [2001 (128) ELT 52 (S.C.)]; (c).

M/s. Vedanta Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Appeal filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable in terms of Section 83 of Finance Act, 1944, against the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at … nine lacs thirty two thousand eight hundred thirty two only) on M/s Sterlite Industries India Ltd., Tuticorin, under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for suppreessing the fact of rendering service and non-payment of service tax. ?

N & N Chopra Consltants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner, Goods ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as made by virtue of Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, is that the multiple penalties imposed in the circumstances of the case were excessive. The assessee is … 3 of 5 High Court-in the case of First Flight Courier Ltd.-. 2011 (22) STR622(P&H) and Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/s. Pannu Property Dealers, … foreknowledge lead to the imposition of recovery of dues assessed as well as imposition of the penalty under Section 78. The court is of the opinion that the invocation of Section 78 cannot be faulted with having regard