Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2011 central section 77 · Page 1 of about 722 results (0.098 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 05 2015

Principal Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi €“II Vs ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-05-2015

Subject : Service Tax

second proviso to Section 11 AC of the CE Act as it stood prior to its substitution by Finance Act, 2011 and to Section 11 AC (1) (c) as it stood after such substitution. Section 11AC of the CE … the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CE Act) read with Section 83 of the Finance … talks of penalty leviable generally upon failure to pay service tax plus interest in accordance with Section 75. Section 77 talks of penalty for contravention of the rules and provisions of the Act for which no penalty is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2014

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-20-2014

Subject : Service Tax

by Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance New Delhi 2 The Commissioner Central Excise and Service Tax Gobichettipalayam 3 The Gobichettipalayam Municipality represented by its … Section 65 (105)(zzzz) and 65(90a) of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act, 2010 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 2010 on the ground that the said provisions are illegal, arbitrary and ultra vires … of India, seeking a writ of declaration, declaring the provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as ultra vires and unconstitutional and unenforceable. For petitioner in W.P.No.16400/2013 Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For RR1& 2 in … & H).Shubh Timb Steels Limited v. Union of India and another; ii 2011 (22) STR257(Ori.).Utkal Builders Limited versus Union of India; iii 2012 (25) STR231(M.P.).Entertainment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

Brijgopalmaheshwari, S/O. Marikishan, Vs. the Districtconsumer Dispute ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

appellant proposing to levy service tax under different heads and interest provided for under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short, 'the Finance Act') and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of that Act. After hearing … THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.48 OF201309-01-2014 M/S.Patel Engineering Limited,12th Square Building, 3rd Floor,Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad,represented by its President

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 2014

M/S. Patelengineering Limited,12th Squa Vs. the Commissionerof Central ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

appellant proposing to levy service tax under different heads and interest provided for under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short, 'the Finance Act') and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of that Act. After hearing … THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.48 OF201309-01-2014 M/S.Patel Engineering Limited,12th Square Building, 3rd Floor,Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad,represented by its President

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2014

P.C. Joshi, Indian Citizen, A practicing Advocate and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

“(a) Declare the impugned provisions in section 65(105) (zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 as inserted by the Finance Act, 2011 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution of India and/or section 66 of the Finance Act, … of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended. The 3rd Respondent is the Central Board of Excise and Customs whereas the 5th respondent is the Ministry … the provisions of Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, provisions relating to levy of penalty under section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 and prosecution under section 89 of the Finance Act, 1994 to the extent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2025

M/S Stemcyte India Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. versus Commissioner of Centr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.70

Acts Finance Act, 1994; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Drugs and Cosmetics (3rd Amendment) Rules, 2011; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Rules, 2018, List of Keywords Services of enrolment, collection, processing, and storage of umbilical … disputed period and thus, whether eligible for exemption from payment of service tax during the said period. Headnotes† Finance Act, 1994 - Exemption notification - “Healthcare Services” - Exemption from payment of service tax - Entitlement to - … 2025 INSC 841 M/s Stemcyte India Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ahmedabad -III (Civil Appeal No(s). 3816-3817 of 2025) … to show cause why their refund claim should not be rejected under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant filed a written … and also proposed imposition of penalties under sections 77(1)(a), 77(1)(d), 77(2) and 78 of the Finance Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2015

M/s. Vedanta Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-2015

Subject : Service Tax

Appeal filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable in terms of Section 83 of Finance Act, 1944, against the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at … day after the due date, till the date of actual compliance on M/s.Sterlite Industries India Ltd., Tuticorin, under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 for their failure to register themselves with the Department; and 5. I impose

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2015

Ms T a Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Sanjeev Kumar Jha Vs. The Un ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-07-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

There was violation of certain circulars and rules of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalty was also affirmed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.Thus, 3 there was no ambiguity at all. So far as liability of this … of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … ground that the order on Petitioner's earlier Writ Petition No. 1705 of 2011 would mean there was a defect of jurisdiction or other cause of … Chandrapura, District­ Bokaro ............ Petitioner Vs. 1. The Union of India through Central Excise & Service Tax Department, Central Revenue Building, I.P. Estate, ITO, P.O.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2015

Ms Ramchandra Singh Through Its Proprietor Ramchandra Singh Vs. The Un ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-08-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

There was violation of certain circulars and rules of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalty was also affirmed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. Thus, there was no ambiguity at all. So far as liability of this … the petitioners of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/RAN/2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … ground that the order on Petitioner's earlier Writ Petition No. 1705 of 2011 would mean there was a defect of jurisdiction or other cause of … & P.S. Chandrapura, District­Bokaro …Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through Central Excise & Service Tax Department, Central Revenue Building, I.P. Estate, ITO, P.O.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2015

Dilip Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Union of India Through Central Excise and Serv ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

There was violation of certain circulars and rules of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalty was also affirmed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.Thus, there was no ambiguity at all. So far as 3 liability of this … of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … ground that the order on Petitioner's earlier Writ Petition No. 1705 of 2011 would mean there was a defect of jurisdiction or other cause of … Jaiswal … … … … Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Central Excise and Service Tax Department, Central Revenue Building, New Delhi.2. The Commissioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial