Advanced Search Results

Principal Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi €“II Vs ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

second proviso to Section 11 AC of the CE Act as it stood prior to its substitution by Finance Act, 2011 and to Section 11 AC (1) (c) as it stood after such substitution. Section 11AC of the CE … the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CE Act) read with Section 83 of the Finance … Act 1994 talks of penalty leviable generally upon failure to pay service tax plus interest in accordance with Section 75. Section 77 talks of penalty for contravention of the rules and provisions of the Act for which no

M/S Stemcyte India Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. versus Commissioner of Centr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.70

amounting to Rs.2,07,29,576/- (Rupees Two crore seven lakhs twenty-nine thousand five hundred and seventy-six only) from them under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended from time to time. (iv) I impose penalty of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees … disputed period and thus, whether eligible for exemption from payment of service tax during the said period. Headnotes† Finance Act, 1994 - Exemption notification - “Healthcare Services” - Exemption from payment of service tax - Entitlement to - … Rules, 1994; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Drugs and Cosmetics (3rd Amendment) Rules, 2011; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Rules, 2018, List of Keywords Services of enrolment, … 2025 INSC 841 M/s Stemcyte India Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ahmedabad -III (Civil Appeal No(s). 3816-3817 of 2025)

Wipro Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the rebate paid, if any, shall be recoverable with interest as per the provisions of section 73 and section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994) as if no service tax and cess have been paid … the appellant, it was liable to pay service tax under the relevant provisions of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The Export of Service Rules, 2005 were framed by notification No.9/2005-ST on 03.03.2005. Rule 5 of the … and Australia.2. The appeal arises out of the order passed by the Central Excise & Service CEAC 16 2012 Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in order

Ms T a Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Sanjeev Kumar Jha Vs. The Un ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

December, 2012 that demand of service tax has been affirmed against this petitioner as well as interest under section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 has also been affirmed. There was violation of certain circulars and rules of … of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … ground that the order on Petitioner's earlier Writ Petition No. 1705 of 2011 would mean there was a defect of jurisdiction or other cause of … Chandrapura, District­ Bokaro ............ Petitioner Vs. 1. The Union of India through Central Excise & Service Tax Department, Central Revenue Building, I.P. Estate, ITO, P.O.

Ms Ramchandra Singh Through Its Proprietor Ramchandra Singh Vs. The Un ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

January, 2013 that demand of service tax has been affirmed against this petitioner as well as interest under section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 has also been 3. affirmed. There was violation of certain circulars and rules … the petitioners of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/RAN/2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … ground that the order on Petitioner's earlier Writ Petition No. 1705 of 2011 would mean there was a defect of jurisdiction or other cause of … & P.S. Chandrapura, District­Bokaro …Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through Central Excise & Service Tax Department, Central Revenue Building, I.P. Estate, ITO, P.O.

Dilip Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Union of India Through Central Excise and Serv ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

December, 2012 that demand of service tax has been affirmed against this petitioner as well as interest under section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 has also been affirmed. There was violation of certain circulars and rules of … of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … ground that the order on Petitioner's earlier Writ Petition No. 1705 of 2011 would mean there was a defect of jurisdiction or other cause of … Jaiswal … … … … Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Central Excise and Service Tax Department, Central Revenue Building, New Delhi.2. The Commissioner

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … were proposed to be imposed on the petitioner. 11. The petitioner filed an elaborate reply dated 1st August, 2011 to the show cause notice inter alia raising the following contentions:- (i) The activities of repair, alteration, renovation … on 22nd February, 2016 and directed that it be heard along with Central Excise Appeal No. 21 of 2015. 2. Rule on interim relief in

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

F.3d 485, 493 288 Cox and Kings (supra) [95] 289 Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd. (2011) 5 SCC 532 [35]; A Ayyasamy v. A Paramasivam (2016) 10 SCC 386 [38]; Vidya Drolia … Bank of India (1984) 1 SCC 43 [32] [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2235 Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. M/s ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV) A … the making of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of section 75 or section 81; (ii) it is in contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or (iii) it … is the same as discrimination; where discrimination is the result of State action, it is a violation of Article 14: therefore, a violation of a

Commissioner of Salem Municipal Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Centra ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

respectively, is recoverable from them under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 along with appropriate interest under Section 75 of the Act. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Central Excise vide his letters dated 01.6.2010 and 18.6.2010 had intimated … Service Tax was introduced on renting of immovable property service with effect from 01.6.2007 by the amendment of Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act, 2007. Further by the amendment in the year 2010, certain other immovable properties were … Property Service" during the period from 1st June 2007 to 31st March 2011 and failed to file mandatory half yearly returns in the Form of

M/s. Vedanta Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Appeal filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable in terms of Section 83 of Finance Act, 1944, against the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at … non payment of service tax, the assesseee was said to be liable for the payment of interest, under Section 75 of the Act, and was also liable for imposition of penalties, under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of