Advanced Search Results
Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...
Chennai
Jun-26-2013
Land Acquisition
(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs, … members join hands for mutuality of interest and share common risk/profit together. 7 to 9. ......10. To sum-up the above, the arrangements entered into by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrincipal Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi €“II Vs ...
Delhi
Dec-05-2015
Service Tax
second proviso to Section 11 AC of the CE Act as it stood prior to its substitution by Finance Act, 2011 and to Section 11 AC (1) (c) as it stood after such substitution. Section 11AC of the CE … Muralidhar, J. 1. This appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CE Act) read with Section 83 of the Finance Act 1994, is directed against an … the extent of 25% in terms of the 3rd proviso to Section 78 (1) of the Finance Act 1994 (as it stood prior to its
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-2016
Service Tax
tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … were proposed to be imposed on the petitioner. 11. The petitioner filed an elaborate reply dated 1st August, 2011 to the show cause notice inter alia raising the following contentions:- (i) The activities of repair, alteration, renovation … on 22nd February, 2016 and directed that it be heard along with Central Excise Appeal No. 21 of 2015. 2. Rule on interim relief in … dispute in the present case pertains to period from 2005-06 to 2009-10. 7. In the month of July, 2010, investigations were conducted by the officers
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association Represented by Its Treasurer ...
Mumbai
Apr-08-2014
Service Tax
by way of amendments to Section 65 of the Finance Act. While so, the Central Government by the Finance Act, 2011 made an amendment to Chapter V of the Finance Act 1994, relating to service tax, inserting sub-clause (zzzzv) … According to the Petitioners, the Notifications at Annexures P3 to P5 came into force with effect from 01.05.2011. 7. It is stated by the Petitioners that the scope and ambit of the Annexures P2, P4 and P5,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.D. Builders Vs. Uoi and anr.
Delhi
Nov-13-2013
Service Tax
2. Contentions of the petitioners can be crystallized as under:(i) Service tax levied from time to time by Finance Act, 1994 and subsequent amendments is in exercise of power under Constitution of India. It is levied on taxable … Service tax is applicable only in respect of service element and the Central Government does not have any power under the residual entry to impose … is leviable.28. In Sudhir Chandra Nawn v. WTO [AIR1969SC59: (1969) 1 SCR108 this Court rejected the contention that Section 7(1) of the Wealth Tax Act was unconstitutional as no Rules had been framed to value the asset for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskItc Ltd Vs. Cce, Kolkata Iv
Supreme Court of India
Sep-18-2019
Service Tax
the ‘assessment’ as prevailed under the 1962 Act and the amended definition under the Act, assessment w.e.f. 8.4.2011, Finance Act, 2011, Section 17 and Section 27 as amended by the Finance Act, 2011. It was urged by learned senior … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 293294 OF2009ITC LIMITED … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA IV … RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2960 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NO.5878 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO.310 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NOS.44324434 … APPEAL NO.7710 OF20142 CIVIL APPEAL NO.5960 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL NO.96 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 738486 OF2019(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.1611416116 OF2017 CIVIL APPEAL No.7387 OF2019(@ SPECIAL
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Sky Limited, Mumbai and Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Throug ...
Chennai
Oct-19-2012
Service Tax
Declaration declaring the imposition of Service Tax under Section 66 or Section 65(105)(zk) of Chapter -V of the Finance Act, 1994 on the "Direct To Home broadcasting services" by the first petitioner as void and infringing Article 14 … Rules, 1939 (Act No.X of 1939) ["Entertainment Tax Act"] as amended by Tamil Nadu Entertainments Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2011 (Act No.XXV of 2011) ["2011 Amendment Act"] and the Tamil Nadu Entertainments Tax Rules, 1939 as revised by … taking note of the viewing public interests and the content availability, the Central Government has fixed uniform rate, apart from the fact that the Telecom … Telemedia Ltd. V. Government of NCT of Delhi and another), rejecting the contention and upholding the validity of Section 7 of the Delhi Entertainments and Betting Tax Act, 1996, held that the levy is on entertainment through DTH
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.C. Joshi, Indian Citizen, A practicing Advocate and Others Vs. Union ...
Mumbai
Dec-15-2014
Service Tax
â(a) Declare the impugned provisions in section 65(105) (zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 as inserted by the Finance Act, 2011 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution of India and/or section 66 of the Finance Act, … for the administration of the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended. The 3rd Respondent is the Central Board of Excise and Customs whereas the 5th respondent is the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of … or any other writ, order or direction of like nature, quashing section 71(A)(5)(d) of the Finance Act, 2011. (c) Issue a writ of mandamus, or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax … the provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules, read with Section 73 of the Act; (ii) penalty should not be imposed under provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Ballal Auto Agency Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Nov-03-2014
Service Tax
& ZZZZW to clause 105 of Sec.65 & 66 of the Finance Act 1964 as amended by the Finance Act-2011 is beyond the Legislative Competency of the Parliament. 3 IN W.P.No.52327/2013 BETWEEN: Bruhat Bengaluru Hotels Association (R) No.87, … Mangalore Taluk, By its Partner Sri.K.Jaya Varma Raj Ballal. …PETITIONER (By Sri.Chandranath Ariga.K., Adv.,) AND:1. 2. (By Sri.C.Shashikanth, Central Govt. Counsel) The Assistant Commissioner (Audit) Central Excise, 4th Floor, Punja Building Annexe, Ballal Baugh, Mangalore - 575 … ORDER Petitioners have assailed sub-clauses (zzzzv) and (zzzzw) of Clause 105 of Section 65 of Finance Act, 1994, under which service tax was introduced. These … legislative competence to levy service tax on the petitioners and other similarly 7 situated persons. Learned counsel has therefore contended that there is no merit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »