Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

(2011(23) S.T.R. 341(A.P.))” decided by the Division Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court the assessee was registered under Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 for providing storage and warehouse services. The Assessee was filing service tax returns … amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (NPD) No.2465 of 2011 and MP.No.1 of 2011 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem-1. .. Appellant … Credit Rules, 2004 iii. When the amendment to Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 by the Finance Act, 2010 is optional to the respondent and the respondent has to opt to avail the benefit provided in … inputs for the aforesaid purpose and does not take credit of the specified duty on such inputs." 12. Section 69(2) of the Finance Act, 2010 brought in Rule 57CCC, which provided for making such reversal of the entry

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … were proposed to be imposed on the petitioner. 11. The petitioner filed an elaborate reply dated 1st August, 2011 to the show cause notice inter alia raising the following contentions:- (i) The activities of repair, alteration, renovation … on 22nd February, 2016 and directed that it be heard along with Central Excise Appeal No. 21 of 2015. 2. Rule on interim relief in … in respect of roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams. 69. His argument is that commercial or industrial construction service was introduced as

Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. Vs. M/S Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

December 28, 2005 to commence the business of housing finance institution. The Central Government, vide Notification dated September 19, 2007, issued under Section 2(1) (m) … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.18 OF2018INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. DECCAN CHRONICLE HOLDINGS LIMITED AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) … by M/s. Indiabulls Financial Services Limited (for short, ‘IBFSL’) on December 08, 2011 and January 05, 2012 in the sum of Rs.50 crores each. IBFSL … contesting respondents which accrued to them under Sections 69 and 69A of the Transfer of Property Act, … the High Court in the writ petition which was filed by the contesting respondents questioning the validity of actions taken by the appellant against the contesting respondents under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial

R.R. Paints Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

57CC of the Cenvat Credit Rules at the relevant time. However, in view of the retrospective amendment by Section 69 of the Finance Act, 2010, they became entitled for such a facility. The appellant was pursuing an alternate … therein was allowed to reverse proportionate credit, in view of the retrospective amendment to Cenvat Credit Rules, by Finance Act, 2010, which allows for reversal of proportionate credit in respect of exempted goods. 4. The Ld. AR appearing … the case of Shree Rama Multi Tech Ltd., Vs. UOI, reported in 2011 (267) ELT 153 (Guj) wherein in a similar situation the appellant therein … are directed against the order-in-appeal No.PKS/323/BEL/2010 dated 24/09/2010 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. 2. The brief facts of the case are that

CochIn Shipyard Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

REVENUE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI 11 004.2. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD COCHIN-682 018.3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER … the Finance Act, 1994 as amended for failure to take W.P.C. No. 16581 of 2013 -3- registration under Section 69 of the Act ibid. iv) Penalty should not be imposed on them under Section 78 of the Finance … As such, there is clear exclusion by virtue of the mandate with reference to Section 65(27) of the Finance Act, 1994.4. The insinuating circumstances are given in Ext.P1 show cause notice dated 02.04.2009 (P14 i to iv) which

Asianet Digital Network Private Ltd. vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

the definition of the term “assessment” in Rule 2(b) of the Service Tax Rules 1994, the provisions of Section 69 and 70 of the Finance Act 1994 and the definition of ‘Central Excise Officer’ in Section 73(1) of … In the absence of billing data of LCO-linked subscribers of the petitioner, provisions of Section 70 of the Finance Act 1994 have been invoked against the petitioner.4.3 After synchronising the response to the summons issued to the petitioner

Asianet Digital Network Private Ltdrepresented by Its Assistant Vice P ...

Court : Kerala

the definition of the term “assessment” in Rule 2(b) of the Service Tax Rules 1994, the provisions of Section 69 and 70 of the Finance Act 1994 and the definition of ‘Central Excise Officer’ in Section 73(1) of … In the absence of billing data of LCO-linked subscribers of the petitioner, provisions of Section 70 of the Finance Act 1994 have been invoked against the petitioner.4.3 After synchronising the response to the summons issued to the petitioner

Dandu Krishna Murthy Raju Vs. the Branch Manager of Max Newyork Life I ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax, they neither violated the terms of the contract, nor the law. As per Section 83 of the Finance Act,1994 read with Section 12B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the incidence of service tax falls on the … Further, the service provider who is responsible for collecting the service tax, has to get himself registered under Section 69 and has to furnish the prescribed return, periodically, under section 70 of Finance Act. It is pertinent to … a part of service tax from 2009 and 2010 @ 1% and 2011 @ 1.5% and 3% surcharge on it, whereas the LIC of India

D.P. Gupta and Company Nabha Vs. the Customs Excise and Service Tax Ap ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

service to the Indian Oil Corporation valued at ` 90,64,862/- without obtaining registration under Section 69 of the Finance Act. The assessee filed its reply dated 26.12.2011. The Additional Commissioner vide order dated 30.11.2012 (Annexure A-2) confirmed the … appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short “the Act”.) against the order dated 18.2.2014 (Annexure A-4) passed by the Custom,