Advanced Search Results
Itc Ltd Vs. Cce, Kolkata Iv
Supreme Court of India
Sep-18-2019
Service Tax
the ‘assessment’ as prevailed under the 1962 Act and the amended definition under the Act, assessment w.e.f. 8.4.2011, Finance Act, 2011, Section 17 and Section 27 as amended by the Finance Act, 2011. It was urged by learned senior … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 293294 OF2009ITC LIMITED … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA IV … RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2960 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NO.5878 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO.310 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NOS.44324434
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-13-2015
Land Acquisition
conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting part of the claims made by the petitioner towards reimbursement of the … shall be sent to all bidders through the issue of an addendum/amendment. 42. Clause 8.1 of the Instructions to Bidder clearly provided that the bidder
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.M Abdulla vs the Commercial Tax Officer
Kerala
Sep-23-2022
Act') assessment is treated as pending u/s.25 and as per provisions of the CST Act, inserted in the Finance Act 2016, time limit mentioned thereunder will not be applicable to the cases in which the dealer fails to … of the first respondent. As per Ext.P1 order, the 1st respondent has finalised the assessment for the year 2011-12 under Rule 6(5) of the Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules, 1957 (for short 'the CST Rules') and there … the learned Government Pleader in the counter affidavit filed that as per Section 42(3) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short 'KVAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax vs M/S Manappuram Finance Ltd.
Kerala
Nov-30-2022
RESPONDENTS: -7- 1 M/S.CHATHAMKULAM PROJECTS/DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. SUMESH BABU2 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE CUSTOMS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF … the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … OT.REV 87/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29- 06-2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE IST APPELLATE ORDER DATED 19- 10-2020 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-I KOZHIKODE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Kerala, vs Pushpangadhan P.,
Kerala
Nov-30-2022
RESPONDENTS: -7- 1 M/S.CHATHAMKULAM PROJECTS/DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. SUMESH BABU2 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE CUSTOMS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF … the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … OT.REV 87/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29- 06-2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE IST APPELLATE ORDER DATED 19- 10-2020 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-I KOZHIKODE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Kerala vs Tulsi Developers India (P) Ltd.
Kerala
Nov-30-2022
RESPONDENTS: -7- 1 M/S.CHATHAMKULAM PROJECTS/DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. SUMESH BABU2 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE CUSTOMS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF … the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … OT.REV 87/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29- 06-2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE IST APPELLATE ORDER DATED 19- 10-2020 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-I KOZHIKODE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala vs Mcp Enterprises
Kerala
Nov-30-2022
RESPONDENTS: -7- 1 M/S.CHATHAMKULAM PROJECTS/DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. SUMESH BABU2 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE CUSTOMS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF … the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … OT.REV 87/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29- 06-2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE IST APPELLATE ORDER DATED 19- 10-2020 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-I KOZHIKODE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Tax Officer, vs M/S.Chathamkulam Projects/Developers (P) Ltd ...
Kerala
Nov-30-2022
RESPONDENTS: -7- 1 M/S.CHATHAMKULAM PROJECTS/DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. SUMESH BABU2 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE CUSTOMS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF … the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … OT.REV 87/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29- 06-2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE IST APPELLATE ORDER DATED 19- 10-2020 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-I KOZHIKODE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commercial Tax Officer vs T.a.Susilkumar
Kerala
Nov-30-2022
RESPONDENTS: -7- 1 M/S.CHATHAMKULAM PROJECTS/DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. SUMESH BABU2 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE CUSTOMS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF … the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … OT.REV 87/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29- 06-2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE IST APPELLATE ORDER DATED 19- 10-2020 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-I KOZHIKODE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of State Tax vs Cee Vee Footwear India (P) Ltd.
Kerala
Nov-30-2022
RESPONDENTS: -7- 1 M/S.CHATHAMKULAM PROJECTS/DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. SUMESH BABU2 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE CUSTOMS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF … the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … OT.REV 87/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29- 06-2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE IST APPELLATE ORDER DATED 19- 10-2020 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-I KOZHIKODE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »