Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax … Industrial Machinery Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd Vs. The State of Gujarat, (1965)16 STC 380); (b) Member, Board of Revenue, West Bengal Vs. M/s.Phelps and Co.(P) Ltd.,

Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs,

Lally Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner (Adjudication), Central Ex ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

for payment of Service Tax under the categories of "Authorized Service Station" and "Business Auxiliary Service" under the Finance Act, 1994. It availed Cenvat credit of duty paid on various inputs and tax paid on better services in … Whether the Explanation added to Rule 2(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 with effect from 1st April, 2011 is clarificatory in nature or only prospective?. (iii) Whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has … Singh, Sh. Shantanu Singh and Sh. Atul Krishna, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER (ADJUDICATION), CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE … exempted services includes services on which no service tax is leviable under Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1944. Trading is a service liable to

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting part of the claims made by the petitioner towards reimbursement of the … by the respondent under clause 22.1 of the Special Conditions of Contract. 38. Clause 32.2 of the Instructions to Bidder clearly indicates that the contract

Madhukar Govindrao Thaware and ors. Vs. Central Bank of India

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Section 5, 29 (2), 8, 3; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and financial Institutions Act (RDDBFI) 1993- Section 30, 2(b) , 19, 20; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Rule 11, 15; Central Excise Act. 1944 - Section 35H(1); West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Section 8 ; Finance Act, 1979 - Section 38 (1); Companies Act, 1956 - section 529A, 20 (3), 25 to 28, 30; Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,; Non-Performing Assets Act (NPA) - Section 17(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 260A; Excise Act - Section 35G; The Income-tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962 - Rule 55A, 86 ; Debt Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules - Rule 2

with non- payment. Non-payment is nothing but failure to pay when due. As per the provisions of the Finance Act, 1979 amount of FTT collected becomes due within fifteen days from the date of collection thereof. Failure to … Writ Petition is preferred in respect of an order dated 5th January 2011 passed by Debts Recovery appellate Tribunal , Mumbai and an order dated … in the land and building construction executed in the year 1987.The respondent Central Bank of India , on the ground that the borrower had executed … defaulter in future is making the payment. Had there been no minimum penalty prescribed under sub-section (3) of Section 38 of the Act, it would have been open for the adjudicating authority to consider the conduct of the

Albert K.P vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

the State Governments.(4) The Central Government may make a request to thePresident to make a reference to the Finance Commission under sub-clause (d) of clause (3) of Article 280 to examine the need for additional resources to … have also framed Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 38 of the RTE … to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2010. Said rules were framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 38 of the RTE Act, 2009. Rule 7 of the RTE Rules, reads thus: “7. Financial Responsibility of the

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service Tax

pay tax thereon or a mere misstatement or mere contravention of the Central Excise Act or the Finance Act, 1994, is not sufficient for invocation … service tax for the fiRs.time was introduced in India in the year 1994 under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. It has been amended from time to time, inter alia, by introducing more categories of services within … relied on a decision of this court in the case of Avery India Ltd.-vs.-Union of India reported in 2011 (268) ELT64 In that case, it was observed that there could not be two assessments for the same … civil engineering construction and was not ‘consulting engineer’ within the meaning of Section 65(11) of the Finance Act, 1994. (as amended by Finance Act, 1997).(6)

Kerala State Electricity Board, Kerala Vs. Kerala State Electricity Re ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

the State Commission to accept the estimates of the Appellant in respect of power purchase cost, interest and finance charges, depreciation, administrative and general expenses, other expenses and transmission and distribution losses, etc. 3.3 In the order … the State Commission by order dated 11.11.2011 in O.P. no. 1 of 2011. 18.2 The State Commission in its rejoinder has pointed out that in … power stations of NTPC and NLC at 7026 MU according to the Central Commission’s norms for target availability and auxiliary consumption. However, the State Commission … Loss Reduction Targets: The State Commission has fixed the loss reduction target without any scientific study and data, actual achievement of target for the FY 2008-09, investment requirements and also without fully allowing the capital expenditure required … duty to be paid to the Government under Section 3(1) of the Kerala Electricity Duty Act. This … against this, the State Commission had allowed Rs. 382.44 crores. Thus, the fund requirement projected by the

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … Rs. 22,41,95,467/- pertaining to the onsite activities was received by the Appellants vide Pay Order dated 28th February 2011. 19. Aggrieved by the aforesaid Order-in-Appeal dated 20.10.2010, the Revenue preferred appeal before the CESTAT (hereinafter referred as … best international practice, the Export of the Service Rules, 2005 were notified. 38. The final submission of Mr.Sridharan is that the amendment/deletion made on 27.02.2010

Itc Ltd Vs. Cce, Kolkata Iv

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

the ‘assessment’ as prevailed under the 1962 Act and the amended definition under the Act, assessment w.e.f. 8.4.2011, Finance Act, 2011, Section 17 and Section 27 as amended by the Finance Act, 2011. It was urged by learned senior … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 293­294 OF2009ITC LIMITED … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA IV … RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2960 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NO.5878 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO.310 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4432­4434 … to any other person, the provision aims at preventing unjust enrichment. 28 38. No doubt about it that the expression which was earlier used in