Advanced Search Results
M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax … Steel Tubes (P) Ltd) versus Collector of C. Ex., ((1995) 2 SCC 372) (III) Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd and Anr Versus Comm. Of C.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...
Chennai
Jun-26-2013
Land Acquisition
(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs, … constitutionally invalid, being issued in excess of the powers conferred under section 37B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-13-2015
Land Acquisition
conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting part of the claims made by the petitioner towards reimbursement of the … statutory variation and will have to be borne by the petitioner accordingly. 37. A perusal of the record clearly indicates that in Clause 8 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax / Central Excise, vs M/S. So ...
Kerala
Dec-05-2022
appeals are filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The circumstances and the issues for consideration in the appeals are identical. For a reason thereof, the … be utilised for the payment of service tax on any output service.41. “Input service”, prior to 1 April, 2011, meant anyservice used by provider of taxable service for providing an output service, including amongst others, activities relating … pay interest to the customers, whereas while extending deposits, the banks receive 37 interest from other banks. It is for this reason that inter-bank deposits
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Pricipal Commissioner of Central Tax & Central Excise, vs Sout ...
Kerala
Dec-05-2022
appeals are filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The circumstances and the issues for consideration in the appeals are identical. For a reason thereof, the … be utilised for the payment of service tax on any output service.41. “Input service”, prior to 1 April, 2011, meant anyservice used by provider of taxable service for providing an output service, including amongst others, activities relating … pay interest to the customers, whereas while extending deposits, the banks receive 37 interest from other banks. It is for this reason that inter-bank deposits
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Principal Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise, vs South ...
Kerala
Dec-05-2022
appeals are filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The circumstances and the issues for consideration in the appeals are identical. For a reason thereof, the … be utilised for the payment of service tax on any output service.41. “Input service”, prior to 1 April, 2011, meant anyservice used by provider of taxable service for providing an output service, including amongst others, activities relating … pay interest to the customers, whereas while extending deposits, the banks receive 37 interest from other banks. It is for this reason that inter-bank deposits
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Principal Commissioner of Central Tax & Central Excise vs Sout ...
Kerala
Dec-05-2022
appeals are filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The circumstances and the issues for consideration in the appeals are identical. For a reason thereof, the … be utilised for the payment of service tax on any output service.41. “Input service”, prior to 1 April, 2011, meant anyservice used by provider of taxable service for providing an output service, including amongst others, activities relating … pay interest to the customers, whereas while extending deposits, the banks receive 37 interest from other banks. It is for this reason that inter-bank deposits
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Principal Commissioner of Central Tax & Central Excise vs the ...
Kerala
Dec-05-2022
appeals are filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The circumstances and the issues for consideration in the appeals are identical. For a reason thereof, the … be utilised for the payment of service tax on any output service.41. “Input service”, prior to 1 April, 2011, meant anyservice used by provider of taxable service for providing an output service, including amongst others, activities relating … pay interest to the customers, whereas while extending deposits, the banks receive 37 interest from other banks. It is for this reason that inter-bank deposits
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2022
Land Acquisition
the reference to ten lakhs was substituted, and the figure of rupees twenty-five lakhs, was inserted, by the Finance Act, 2011 (w.e.f. 01.04.2012). By Finance Act, 2015 (w.e.f. 01.04.2016), the first two provisos to Section 2(15) were deleted, and … the taxable territories to charitable purposes which tend to promote international welfare in which India is interested, the Central Board of Revenue may, by general or special order, direct that it shall not be included in the … ploughed back to feed the charitable object. B. Arguments of the assessee-organizations 37. Mr. S.N. Soparkar, learned Senior Advocate appeared for the Ahmedabad Urban Development
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India
Chennai
Jun-20-2014
Service Tax
by Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance New Delhi 2 The Commissioner Central Excise and Service Tax Gobichettipalayam 3 The Gobichettipalayam Municipality represented by its … of India, seeking a writ of declaration, declaring the provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as ultra vires and unconstitutional and unenforceable. For petitioner in W.P.No.16400/2013 Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For RR1& 2 in … the following judgments: i [2011].37 VST46(P & H).Shubh Timb Steels Limited v. Union of India and another; ii 2011 (22) STR257(Ori.).Utkal Builders Limited versus Union of India; iii 2012 (25) STR231(M.P.).Entertainment World Developers Limited versus Union of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »