Advanced Search Results

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … 1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed

Itc Ltd Vs. Cce, Kolkata Iv

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

the ‘assessment’ as prevailed under the 1962 Act and the amended definition under the Act, assessment w.e.f. 8.4.2011, Finance Act, 2011, Section 17 and Section 27 as amended by the Finance Act, 2011. It was urged by learned senior … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 293­294 OF2009ITC LIMITED … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA IV … RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2960 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NO.5878 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO.310 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4432­4434 … modified under Section 128 or under other relevant provisions of the Act. 34 48. Resultantly, we find that the order(s) passed by Customs, Excise, and

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

subsequent to 08.04.2011 since s.17 has undergone a radical change by virtue of the amendments made by the Finance Act, 2011. [Paras 81-83] Customs Act, 1962 - s.17 - Assessment of duty - Changes to s.17 w.e.f. 11.04.2011 - … show cause notices u/s.28 - Officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Commissionerates of Customs (Preventive), Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence and Commissionerates of Central Excise and other similarly situated officers are proper officers for the purposes … Such entrustment could be either conditional or unconditional - Object of this Section is to confer powers of search, seizure, arrest and recording of statements, … and 10694-10695 of 2024, R.P.(C) No. 155 of 2022 In C.A. No. 3411 of 2020, R.P.(C) No. 1289 of 2021 In C.A. No. 5053 of

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

v. Municipal Board [1965] 1 SCR 970 : 1964 SCC OnLine SC 119; Datar Switchgears Ltd. v. Tata Finance Ltd. (2000) 8 SCC 151; Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Raja Transport (P) Ltd. [2009] 13 SCR 510 … 92; Stephen Waddams, Principle and Policy in Contract Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011); Arthur Allen Leff, ‘Unconscionability and the Code-Emperor’s New Clause’ (1967) 115(4) University … [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2173 : 2024 INSC 857 Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. M/s ECI SPIC … challenge procedures under Sections 13 and 14; and (iv) judicial review of the decision of an arbitrator under Section 34; g. Voestalpine (supra) has upheld the maintenance of a panel of potential arbitrators by public sector undertakings. It … is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. Headnotes† Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Unilateral appointment clauses in a public-private contract: Held: [Per Dhananjaya

Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs, … 2012: ------------------- M/s.Inox Leisure Ltd., having its Office at Chennai City Centre, 34rd Floor, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai  600 004, acting through Authorised Representative

Commissioner of Salem Municipal Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Centra ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

: Rs.22,39,370.00 3. According to the petitioner, the respondent has wrongly interpreted Section 11(A)(1) of the Central Excise Act and Section 73(1) of the Finance … Service Tax was introduced on renting of immovable property service with effect from 01.6.2007 by the amendment of Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act, 2007. Further by the amendment in the year 2010, certain other immovable properties were … the category of "Renting of Immovable Property Service" during the period from 1st June 2007 to 31st March 2011 and failed to file mandatory half yearly returns in the Form of ST-3. An amount of Rs.79,33,135/- and … The Commissioner Salem Municipal Corporation Salem. .. Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise O/o. Commissioner of Central Excise No.1, Foulks Compound Anai Road, Sale”001. … an appeal on 28.12.2012 with a delay of 34 days before the appellate authority and the same

Kerala Classified Hotels and Resorts Ass Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service Tax

65 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act 2011 relating to levy of service tax on taxable services referred there and for consequential reliefs. The relevant portion … 62 respectively of List II of W.P.C..Nos 14045 of 2011 & conn.cases. 34 the Seventh Schedule. ii) That if any payments have been made by … senior counsel Sri. N.Venkataraman, learned senior counsel Dr.K.B.Mohamedkutty, Sri.Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil and Sri.John Varghese, learned Standing Counsel for Central Board of Excise. Having regard to the contentions urged by either side, the following questions arise for consideration:

Chitra Construction Company Vs. Addl Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Valley, Green Home, Onampalayam, Coimbator”109. culminating in Mahazar dated 1.3.2012 as being ultra vires Section 82 of the Finance Act, apart from being in excess of jurisdiction and unconstitutional. W.P.No.22902 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 … .. Petitioner in W.P.No.22902 of 2012 vs.1. The Additional Commissioner of Customs Central Excise & Service Tax Head Quarters Preventive Unit 6/7, ATD Street Race … relevant bearing to the formation of the belief and are not irrelevant or extraneous to the purpose of Section 34 of the Income Tax Act, 1922.73. In Chhugamal Rajpatl Vs. S.P.Chaliha and others, 1971 AIR 730.the Supreme Court … Private Limited, either directly or indirectly. During the period, from 2007-08 to 2011-12, upto the month of February 2012, the companies had received a total

M/S. Jmc Projects (India) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax Ahme ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Service Tax

Finance Act, 1994. This was precisely the point explained to Shri Amit K. Raval, Vice President (Accounts) and Central Excise authorized signatory of the appellant Company at the time of recording of his statement on 07.8.2008. It … of Rs. 21,79,20,479/- along with interest has been confirmed and penalties under Section 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 imposed. 2. Brief facts of the case are that searches were carried out by DGCEI officers at … undertaken by DGCEI revealed that appellant was classifying the services rendered for 34 ongoing contracts under Commercial or Industrial Construction Services and Construction of Complex

Way2Wealth Brokers Pvt Ltd. Vs. C.B. Sharma

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

was justified in coming to the conclusion that the claim was within limitation. 9. In Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Miral Kanaksinh Thakore (2014 SCC OnLine Bom 22= (2014) 1 Bom CR 481)this Court (Coram:R. D. … the matter. 2. The Appellants' case is as under: On 20 September 2011, an Award was passed by the panel of Arbitrators (Arbitral Tribunal) rejecting … Chase Trading Co and anr 2002 (3) Bom. C.R. 201. 1716 (13) Central Warehousing Corporation v. A.S.A. Transport (2008) 3 Mh. L. J. 382 5. … 1996) against judgment dated 12 September 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge as the Arbitration Petition, under Section 34 of the Act of 1996, has been allowed and thereby directed the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal under the Bye-laws,