Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Salem Municipal Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Centra ...
Chennai
Mar-05-2013
Service Tax
: Rs.22,39,370.00 3. According to the petitioner, the respondent has wrongly interpreted Section 11(A)(1) of the Central Excise Act and Section 73(1) of the Finance … Service Tax was introduced on renting of immovable property service with effect from 01.6.2007 by the amendment of Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act, 2007. Further by the amendment in the year 2010, certain other immovable properties were … the category of "Renting of Immovable Property Service" during the period from 1st June 2007 to 31st March 2011 and failed to file mandatory half yearly returns in the Form of ST-3. An amount of Rs.79,33,135/- and … The Commissioner Salem Municipal Corporation Salem. .. Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise O/o. Commissioner of Central Excise No.1, Foulks Compound Anai Road, Sale”001.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskItc Ltd Vs. Cce, Kolkata Iv
Supreme Court of India
Sep-18-2019
Service Tax
the ‘assessment’ as prevailed under the 1962 Act and the amended definition under the Act, assessment w.e.f. 8.4.2011, Finance Act, 2011, Section 17 and Section 27 as amended by the Finance Act, 2011. It was urged by learned senior … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 293294 OF2009ITC LIMITED … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA IV … RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2960 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NO.5878 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO.310 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NOS.44324434 … Union of India & Ors. vs. Micromax Informatics Ltd., reported in (2016) 335 ELT446(Del) the High Court of Delhi has opined that an important change
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...
Chennai
Jun-26-2013
Land Acquisition
(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-13-2015
Land Acquisition
conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 33. The respondent had accordingly introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 dated 21st May, … section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting part of the claims made by the petitioner towards reimbursement of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs S Annanda Padmavathi
Chennai
Feb-19-2026
and WMP No.9683 of 20251. Union of India Rep.by Revenue Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi.2. The Chairman CBEC HUDCO Vishala Building, Bhikaji Cama Palace, New Delhi.3. The Chief … physical test again. This forced the respondent to file OA No.735 of 2011. The Tribunal had directed the writ petitioners to consider the case of … HUDCO Vishala Building, Bhikaji Cama Palace, New Delhi.3. The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise(CCA) Chennai Zone, 26/1, Mahathma Gandhi Road, Nungabakkam, Chennai.4. The Commissioner of … be reserved for persons with disabilities and such posts should be periodically reviewed and identified and updated. Under Section 33 of the Act, not less than 3% of the posts should be kept reserved for persons with disability.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Santani Sales Organisation vs.central Excise, Customs and Service ...
Delhi
May-31-2018
Excise
Section 83 of the Finance Act after its amendment in the year 2011 (sic, 2012). The said ruling was over-turned and set aside, observing that … right to appeal before the Tribunal was subsequently taken away and withdrawn. The court felt that reference to Section 33 EE of the C.E. Act in Section 83 of the Finance Act would not make any difference and … the C.E. Act, does not apply to service tax appeals preferred under Sections 85 and 86 of the Finance Act, 1994.5. In view of the limited controversy and question for consideration, we need not refer to the factual … M/S SANTANI SALES ORGANISATION ........ Petitioner Through Mr. J.K. Mittal, Advocate. versus CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIUBNAL, DELHI AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGmr. Hyd. International Airport Ltd., Vs. Central Board of Excise and ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-11-2012
Land Acquisition
2012(5)ALD177
in India. (2) Every notification issued under this section and in force immediately before the commencement of the Finance Act, 2003 shall, on such commencement, be deemed to have been issued under the provisions of this section as … were subsequently modified by Circular No. 27/2007-Cus dated 06.04.2004, issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs . One of the stipulations contained in … who would approve proper places in such customs ports or customs airports for unloading and loading of goods. Section 33 and 34 regulate the operations of loading and unloading of goods at such specified places and that too
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Singh Vs. State and ors.
Delhi
Oct-24-2011
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 8, 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Section 120-B
money trial. Parliamentary Committee had also tried to probe the money trial but as per report of Ministry Finance mentioned at Page No.33 that "banks are unable to trace out the person who has withdrawn the said … Report of Shri Amar Singh, Hon'ble MP, Rajya Sabha On 12th September, 2011 Sh. Amar Singh, 55/M, was referred by the board of four Doctors … Neera Chaudhary, Associate Professor, Neurology, G.B. Pant Hospital.4. Dr. Anuj Mittal, Psychiatrist, Central Jail Tihar.5. Dr. Jwala Prasad, Senior Resident, Central Jail Tihar.13. Accordingly, the … crime Branch of the Delhi Police on 29.01.2009 under Sections 8 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, on receipt of a complaint from the Secretary General of Lok Sabha, in light of the recommendations and … Branch of the Delhi Police on 29.01.2009 under Sections 8 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEbiz.Com Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Sep-01-2016
Service Tax
on 19th and 21st January 2016 by the DGCEI are illegal and ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 ( FA ). Respondent No. 3 was impleaded pursuant to the order dated 28th January, 2016 passed … ), directed againstUnion of India (Respondent No. 1), the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence ('DGCEI - Respondent No. 2) and the Commissioner Audit-II of … instance of non-cooperation. Rejoinder Affidavit by the Petitioner 33. A rejoinder affidavit dated 30th April 2016 was … ST-3 returns from April 2009 to March 2012; copies of balance sheets from Assessment Year (AY) 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 and the trial balance for 2012-2013; a file containing miscellaneous papers and two brochures. Summons were issued on … late in the evening at 7:40 pm on 20th January 2016 under Section 91 of the FA and sent to judicial custody. It was alleged
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.C. Joshi, Indian Citizen, A practicing Advocate and Others Vs. Union ...
Mumbai
Dec-15-2014
Service Tax
â(a) Declare the impugned provisions in section 65(105) (zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 as inserted by the Finance Act, 2011 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution of India and/or section 66 of the Finance Act, … for the administration of the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended. The 3rd Respondent is the Central Board of Excise and Customs whereas the 5th respondent is the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of … the levy of Service Tax on advocates and the amendments made thereto. 33. Admittedly, there is no separate legislation styled as Service Tax Act. Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »