Advanced Search Results
Itc Ltd Vs. Cce, Kolkata Iv
Supreme Court of India
Sep-18-2019
Service Tax
the ‘assessment’ as prevailed under the 1962 Act and the amended definition under the Act, assessment w.e.f. 8.4.2011, Finance Act, 2011, Section 17 and Section 27 as amended by the Finance Act, 2011. It was urged by learned senior … JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 293294 OF2009ITC LIMITED … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA IV … RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2960 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NO.5878 … interest, if any, paid on such duty to any other person; (d) the export duty as specified in section 26; (e) drawback of duty payable under sections 74 and 75; (f) the duty and interest, if any, paid
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.C. Joshi, Indian Citizen, A practicing Advocate and Others Vs. Union ...
Mumbai
Dec-15-2014
Service Tax
â(a) Declare the impugned provisions in section 65(105) (zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 as inserted by the Finance Act, 2011 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution of India and/or section 66 of the Finance Act, … for the administration of the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended. The 3rd Respondent is the Central Board of Excise and Customs whereas the 5th respondent is the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of … as ultra vires, arbitrary and violative of Articles 13, 14, 19(1)(g), 246, 265 and 268A of the Constitution of India. (b) Issue a writ, order
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask1.Dr.K.A.Kuppusamy Vs. 1.The Secretary,
Chennai
Jul-23-2014
Education
after the NIT Act had come into being, in exercise of the powers conferred under Sub-Section 1 of Section 26 of the NIT Act, 2007, the Central Government, with the prior approval, framed the fiRs.Statute for all National … dated 17.02.2011 on the above subject and to state that the matter was taken up with the Integrated Finance Division of this Ministry. IFD has since observed that as per the O.M.No.4/1/87-P.1.C-1 dated 01.05.1987 (copy enclosed) issued
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...
Chennai
Jun-26-2013
Land Acquisition
(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs, … R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Petition Nos.225, 1008, 1116, 2137, 2643, 2648, 2946, 3948, 3949, 4903, 5899, 5901, 5903, 5905, 6219 and 11346
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2022
Land Acquisition
the reference to ten lakhs was substituted, and the figure of rupees twenty-five lakhs, was inserted, by the Finance Act, 2011 (w.e.f. 01.04.2012). By Finance Act, 2015 (w.e.f. 01.04.2016), the first two provisos to Section 2(15) were deleted, and … the taxable territories to charitable purposes which tend to promote international welfare in which India is interested, the Central Board of Revenue may, by general or special order, direct that it shall not be included in the … on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 B. Arguments of the assessee-organizations ................................................................................................. 26 C. Revenue’s rebuttal arguments................................................................................................................... 54 III. Analysis and reasoning ............................................................................................................................... 55 A.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jan-02-2023
Land Acquisition
Court in the case of Rojer Mathew (supra) considered the question, as to whether Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017, which does not prescribe qualifications, appointment, term and conditions of service, salary and allowances, etc. suffers from … November 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned Notification”), issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section … 110-158 Precedents construing the word “any”…………………. Paras 112-127 Purposive interpretation …………………………………… Paras 128-143 Construction of sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the RBI Act……………………………………………………….. Paras 144-157 X. ISSUE No.(ii)……………………………………………….. Paras 159-211 Precedents considering delegated legislation ……….. Paras 162-193
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax … and not excisable goods and hence, reliance on this judgment is misconceived. 26. The appellants in support of their alternate contention that the ‘towers are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatya Developers Pvt Ltd. and Another Vs. Pearey Lal Bhawan Associatio ...
Delhi
Oct-13-2015
Service Tax
common service and facilities. With effect from June 01, 2007 the Central Government by amending Chapter-V of the Finance Act, 1994 levied service tax on renting of immovable property for business purposes. It was claimed that the service … the learned Single Judge. The case of Satya is covered by the decision of Supreme Court reported as 2011 (13) SCC 497 Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (Earlier Ultratech Cemco Ltd.) vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. Reliance … Sales of Goods Act, 1930 which have no application to service tax. Section 12B of the Central Excise Act relied upon by the learned Single … Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd.vs. M/s Dewan Chand Ram Saran it was held: 26. As far as the submission of shifting of tax liability is concerned,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLally Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner (Adjudication), Central Ex ...
Delhi
Jul-25-2018
Service Tax
for payment of Service Tax under the categories of "Authorized Service Station" and "Business Auxiliary Service" under the Finance Act, 1994. It availed Cenvat credit of duty paid on various inputs and tax paid on better services in … Whether the Explanation added to Rule 2(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 with effect from 1st April, 2011 is clarificatory in nature or only prospective?. (iii) Whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has … Singh, Sh. Shantanu Singh and Sh. Atul Krishna, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER (ADJUDICATION), CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE … exempted services includes services on which no service tax is leviable under Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1944. Trading is a service liable to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Salem Municipal Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Centra ...
Chennai
Mar-05-2013
Service Tax
: Rs.22,39,370.00 3. According to the petitioner, the respondent has wrongly interpreted Section 11(A)(1) of the Central Excise Act and Section 73(1) of the Finance … Service Tax was introduced on renting of immovable property service with effect from 01.6.2007 by the amendment of Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act, 2007. Further by the amendment in the year 2010, certain other immovable properties were … the category of "Renting of Immovable Property Service" during the period from 1st June 2007 to 31st March 2011 and failed to file mandatory half yearly returns in the Form of ST-3. An amount of Rs.79,33,135/- and … The Commissioner Salem Municipal Corporation Salem. .. Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise O/o. Commissioner of Central Excise No.1, Foulks Compound Anai Road, Sale”001.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »