Advanced Search Results
Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-13-2015
Land Acquisition
conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting part of the claims made by the petitioner towards reimbursement of the … Director (Marketing) of the respondent for the appointment of an arbitrator. On 24th June, 2008 the Director (Marketing) of the respondent nominated Mr.S.Chandramohan, GM (Finance),
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFederation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and Others V ...
Delhi
Aug-12-2016
Service Tax
(f) of Article 366 (29A). 21. Mr Venkataraman pointed out that the enactment by the Parliament by the Finance Act, 2011 by which two new transactions were brought within the net of service tax with effect from 1 st … consideration (not including a grant or subvention payment made by one government agency or department, whether of the central government or of any state government, to another) and includes- (i) to (vi).... (vii) supply, by way of … 226 of the Constitution of India is to the constitutional validity of Section 65 (105) (zzzzv) of the Finance Act 1994 (FA) whereby the provision … the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions require to be referred to. Articles 245, 246 and 248 of the Constitution read thus: "245. (1) Subject to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskItc Ltd Vs. Cce, Kolkata Iv
Supreme Court of India
Sep-18-2019
Service Tax
the ‘assessment’ as prevailed under the 1962 Act and the amended definition under the Act, assessment w.e.f. 8.4.2011, Finance Act, 2011, Section 17 and Section 27 as amended by the Finance Act, 2011. It was urged by learned senior … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 293294 OF2009ITC LIMITED … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA IV … RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2960 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NO.5878 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO.310 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NOS.44324434 … is an order of assessment. It cannot be said that there is 24 no order of assessment passed in such a case. When there is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...
Chennai
Jun-26-2013
Land Acquisition
(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs, … Entry 62 of List II of Schedule VII and Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 246 and 265 of the Constitution of India, in so far as the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.C. Joshi, Indian Citizen, A practicing Advocate and Others Vs. Union ...
Mumbai
Dec-15-2014
Service Tax
â(a) Declare the impugned provisions in section 65(105) (zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 as inserted by the Finance Act, 2011 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution of India and/or section 66 of the Finance Act, … for the administration of the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended. The 3rd Respondent is the Central Board of Excise and Customs whereas the 5th respondent is the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of … provisions as ultra vires, arbitrary and violative of Articles 13, 14, 19(1)(g), 246, 265 and 268A of the Constitution of India. (b) Issue a writ,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2022
Land Acquisition
the reference to ten lakhs was substituted, and the figure of rupees twenty-five lakhs, was inserted, by the Finance Act, 2011 (w.e.f. 01.04.2012). By Finance Act, 2015 (w.e.f. 01.04.2016), the first two provisos to Section 2(15) were deleted, and … F. Deletion of certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) 24. Section 10(20A) had been inserted by the Finance Act, 1970, w.e.f. 01.04.1962; … the taxable territories to charitable purposes which tend to promote international welfare in which India is interested, the Central Board of Revenue may, by general or special order, direct that it shall not be included in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Shobana Vs. Assistant Director at the Directorate of Enforcement
Chennai
Sep-25-2013
Education
adjourned. (iii)In the decision Indian Bank, represented by its Chief Manager, Chennai V. Government of India Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Chennai, 2012 (4) CTC225 in paragraph 43, it is held as follows: ".43. .... The … W.P.No.14083/2013) committed the crime and filed a final report in C.C.No.88 of 2011 on the file of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai who took … Petitioner in W.P.No.14083/2013) and his friend Valluvan (Petitioner in W.P.No.14085/2013) before the Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai with an allegation of impersonation and cheating and … of the powers conferred upon him as per Section 50 (2) and (3) of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, he required the presence of the Writ Petitioners at his office on the dates and time specified. … Government of India (W.P.No.2429 of 2009 decided on 24.11.2009) wherein in paragraphs 17 to 20, it is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...
Delhi
Oct-09-2013
Land Acquisition
is at the "aggregate" level and not at the "individual" level is expressed thus: (First Principles of Public Finance by De Marco, pp83) The fee must be equal, in the aggregate to the cost of production of … this case, the respondents had successfully challenged provisions of the Tamil Nadu Uniform System of School Education (Amendment) Act, 2011, a State law, before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. Right to education was a fundamental right … it was repugnant to the earlier Act passed by the Parliament, namely, Central Act of 1950. The Court thereafter pertinently held thus:- W.P.(C)No.4770/2012 page 165 … was sought for. Take for illustration -- that a particular provision namely, section 3 of the State law is repugnant to enactment A made by … duly authenticated was presented to the President on 24th June, 1926. On July 3, the first session
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...
Delhi
Oct-09-2013
Land Acquisition
is at the "aggregate" level and not at the "individual" level is expressed thus: (First Principles of Public Finance by De Marco, pp83) The fee must be equal, in the aggregate to the cost of production of … this case, the respondents had successfully challenged provisions of the Tamil Nadu Uniform System of School Education (Amendment) Act, 2011, a State law, before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. Right to education was a fundamental right … it was repugnant to the earlier Act passed by the Parliament, namely, Central Act of 1950. The Court thereafter pertinently held thus:- W.P.(C)No.4770/2012 page 165 … was sought for. Take for illustration -- that a particular provision namely, section 3 of the State law is repugnant to enactment A made by … duly authenticated was presented to the President on 24th June, 1926. On July 3, the first session
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-2016
Service Tax
tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … were proposed to be imposed on the petitioner. 11. The petitioner filed an elaborate reply dated 1st August, 2011 to the show cause notice inter alia raising the following contentions:- (i) The activities of repair, alteration, renovation … on 22nd February, 2016 and directed that it be heard along with Central Excise Appeal No. 21 of 2015. 2. Rule on interim relief in … not be raised for the past period. (v) The Board's circular dated 24th February, 2009 being an oppressive circular, had only prospective effect. (vi) The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »