Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2011 central section 21 · Page 1 of about 2,086 results (0.074 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 26 2013

Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs, … Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Petition Nos.225, 1008, 1116, 2137, 2643, 2648, 2946, 3948, 3949, 4903, 5899, 5901, 5903, 5905, 6219 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2014

P.C. Joshi, Indian Citizen, A practicing Advocate and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

“(a) Declare the impugned provisions in section 65(105) (zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 as inserted by the Finance Act, 2011 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution of India and/or section 66 of the Finance Act, … for the administration of the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended. The 3rd Respondent is the Central Board of Excise and Customs whereas the 5th respondent is the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of … and is accordingly violative of fundamental rights guaranteed Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution. The purpose to exempt representation and arbitration on behalf

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2013

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

pro tanto repealed on account of the Central Legislation Chit Fund Act, 1982. In the circumstances, the Kerala Finance Act 7 of 2002 introducing Section 4(1)(a) in Kerala Chitties Act, 1975, was also void, as the State Legislation … Article 43-B in Chapter IV - Directive Principles of State policy was inserted by the Constitution (97th Amendment) Act, 2011. In furtherance of this, is Part IX-B -The Co-operative Societies. It contains Articles 243-ZH to 243-ZT. 'Board' is … to become a Member for admission into a Society is governed by the Byelaws, Act and the Rules. Section 21(2)(i) conditions the admission of a person as a member, subject to his satisfying the criteria laid down in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 2016

Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and Others V ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-12-2016

Subject : Service Tax

(f) of Article 366 (29A). 21. Mr Venkataraman pointed out that the enactment by the Parliament by the Finance Act, 2011 by which two new transactions were brought within the net of service tax with effect from 1 st … consideration (not including a grant or subvention payment made by one government agency or department, whether of the central government or of any state government, to another) and includes- (i) to (vi).... (vii) supply, by way of … 226 of the Constitution of India is to the constitutional validity of Section 65 (105) (zzzzv) of the Finance Act 1994 (FA) whereby the provision

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2015

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting part of the claims made by the petitioner towards reimbursement of the … prevail over addendum issued by the respondent to the Instructions to Bidder. 21. Learned senior counsel placed reliance on clause 6 of the Special Conditions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2015

R. Flower Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Tuticorin and Another

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Oct-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the loan account and took up the matter only in the year 2011. Therefore, neither the first respondent nor the second respondent had acted in … loan amount and therefore, the subsidy amount was sent back to the Central Government through the Bank. Subsequently, two loan accounts of the petitioner were … law. The proceedings of Lok Adalat is under Chapter IV of the Legal Service Authority Act. As per Section 21 of the Act, an award passed by the Lok Adalat is deemed to be a decree of Civil … issued by the second respondent. According to the said letter, if the bank account becomes NPA and the financing bank fails to recover the entire dues, subsidy benefit would not be available for the project. Accordingly, in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2013

Ags Entertainment Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Central Board of Excise and Customs, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 3.The Commissioner … Declaration, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 declaring that Section 65(105)(zzzzt) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2010 unconstitutional and ultra vires, Article 246 of the Constitution of India … R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Petition Nos.29398 of 2010, 482, 483, 1361, 7887, 17245, 28040 of 2011 231, 832, 2138, 2947, 3144, 4904, 5777, 5900, 5902, 5904, 5906, 6220, 31291 of 2012 1676, 1777, 3362, … of 2010, 482, 483, 1361, 7887, 17245, 28040 of 2011 231, 832, 2138, 2947, 3144, 4904, 5777, 5900, 5902, 5904, 5906, 6220, 31291 of 2012

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

the reference to ten lakhs was substituted, and the figure of rupees twenty-five lakhs, was inserted, by the Finance Act, 2011 (w.e.f. 01.04.2012). By Finance Act, 2015 (w.e.f. 01.04.2016), the first two provisos to Section 2(15) were deleted, and … the taxable territories to charitable purposes which tend to promote international welfare in which India is interested, the Central Board of Revenue may, by general or special order, direct that it shall not be included in the … @ SLP(C) No.14995/2019; C.A. No._____/2022 @ SLP (C) No._____/2022 @ Diary No(s). 21237/2019; C.A. No._____/2022 @ SLP (C) No._____/2022 @ Diary No(s). 17255/2020; C.A. No._____/2022

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2014

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … Rs. 22,41,95,467/- pertaining to the onsite activities was received by the Appellants vide Pay Order dated 28th February 2011. 19. Aggrieved by the aforesaid Order-in-Appeal dated 20.10.2010, the Revenue preferred appeal before the CESTAT (hereinafter referred as … the said Order in Appeal dated 25.07.2011 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). 21. In view of the above Order in Appeal, since the appeal of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax … capital goods which are further used in the factory of the manufacture; 21. A plain reading of the definition of ‘capital goods' as defined under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial