Advanced Search Results

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting part of the claims made by the petitioner towards reimbursement of the … entitled to the differential rate of service taxes i.e. between 10.20% to 12.24% in the bills raised after 18th April, 2006 under Clause 22.1 of

Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(a) of clause (1) of Section 13.4. In Section 65, Clause (104c) of the Finance Act by the Finance Act, 2011, for the words operational assistance for marketing, the words operational or administrative assistance in any manner were substituted … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs, … Tax Commissionerate of Service Tax, IV Floor, Newry Buildings, No.2054-1, Second Avenue, 12th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. .. Respondents Prayer: W.P.No.225 of 2012

Principal Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi €“II Vs ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

second proviso to Section 11 AC of the CE Act as it stood prior to its substitution by Finance Act, 2011 and to Section 11 AC (1) (c) as it stood after such substitution. Section 11AC of the CE … Muralidhar, J. 1. This appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CE Act) read with Section 83 of the Finance Act 1994, is directed against an … Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 83 thereof. 12. With these prefatory comments, the scheme of the provisions of the Finance

Union of India & Others versus Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.756; (2025) 5 SCC 906

pertains to the correctness of the judgments of the High Court setting aside various amendments made to the Finance Act, 1994; and whether sole distributor/purchaser of the lottery tickets is liable to pay service tax on the sale … Judgment and Order dated 29.11.2012 of the High Court of Sikkim in WP Nos. 23 and 36 of 2011 With Civil Appeal Nos. 9506-9507 of 2013, Civil Appeal Nos. 21722173 of 2016, Civil Appeal No. 16118 of … : AIR 1968 SC 784; Moped India Ltd. v. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Nellore [1985] Supp. 1 SCR 954 : (1986) 1 SCC 125; … Agencies Ltd. [2009] 7 SCR 946 : (2009) 12 SCC 209; State of Haryana v. Suman Enterprises … category of taxable services, namely “Business Auxiliary Service,” under sub-section (19) of Section 65, effective from 01.07.2003. Pursuant to this amendment, the Service Tax Department

Sri Ziaullakhan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

(for brevity, the same is called as “RGRHCL”) to take appropriate steps. RGRHCL is a Karnataka Government undertaking financed by Central and State Governments to undertake welfare measures such as construction of houses, etc. The main object … He had discharged duties from 15.12.2011 to 20.11.2015. That, from 2008 to 2011, one Siddalingappa was working as Deputy Director. During his tenure, an amount … 28.12.2016 passed by the State Government (Annexure ‘B’) and (iii) Report dated 17.09.2016 in reference No.Compt/Uplok/GLB-5215/2012/ARE-5, issued under Section 12(3) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 (‘KL Act’ for short) (Annexure ‘C’). BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:3. Since,

Sri L R Kumaraswamy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

(for brevity, the same is called as “RGRHCL”) to take appropriate steps. RGRHCL is a Karnataka Government undertaking financed by Central and State Governments to undertake welfare measures such as construction of houses, etc. The main object … He had discharged duties from 15.12.2011 to 20.11.2015. That, from 2008 to 2011, one Siddalingappa was working as Deputy Director. During his tenure, an amount … 28.12.2016 passed by the State Government (Annexure ‘B’) and (iii) Report dated 17.09.2016 in reference No.Compt/Uplok/GLB-5215/2012/ARE-5, issued under Section 12(3) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 (‘KL Act’ for short) (Annexure ‘C’). BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:3. Since,

Sri R F Hudedavar Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

(for brevity, the same is called as “RGRHCL”) to take appropriate steps. RGRHCL is a Karnataka Government undertaking financed by Central and State Governments to undertake welfare measures such as construction of houses, etc. The main object … He had discharged duties from 15.12.2011 to 20.11.2015. That, from 2008 to 2011, one Siddalingappa was working as Deputy Director. During his tenure, an amount … 28.12.2016 passed by the State Government (Annexure ‘B’) and (iii) Report dated 17.09.2016 in reference No.Compt/Uplok/GLB-5215/2012/ARE-5, issued under Section 12(3) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 (‘KL Act’ for short) (Annexure ‘C’). BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:3. Since,

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … were proposed to be imposed on the petitioner. 11. The petitioner filed an elaborate reply dated 1st August, 2011 to the show cause notice inter alia raising the following contentions:- (i) The activities of repair, alteration, renovation … on 22nd February, 2016 and directed that it be heard along with Central Excise Appeal No. 21 of 2015. 2. Rule on interim relief in … the Act could not be simultaneously imposed for the period in dispute. 12. However, without appreciating the submissions made by the petitioners, respondent no. 2

Kerala Classified Hotels and Resorts Ass Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service Tax

65 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act 2011 relating to levy of service tax on taxable services referred there and for consequential reliefs. The relevant portion … goods by the person making the W.P.C..Nos 14045 of 2011 & conn.cases. 12 transfer, delivery or supply and purchase of those goods by the person … senior counsel Sri. N.Venkataraman, learned senior counsel Dr.K.B.Mohamedkutty, Sri.Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil and Sri.John Varghese, learned Standing Counsel for Central Board of Excise. Having regard to the contentions urged by either side, the following questions arise for consideration:

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

11-AC of the Finance Act,1994 was also imposed by the said order. 12. As regards the stay application, by an order dated 1.5.2007 passed in … amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax