Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … appellant being aggrieved by the said order passed by the Tribunal had filed Central Excise Appeal no.116 of 2010 before this Court. By an order dated 18.11.2010 passed by this Court while admitting the appeal filed by

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

CJI1 Leave granted. BRIEF BACKGROUND:2. In the present batch of cases, the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and of the rules framed in consonance has been assailed. While it would be repetitious to reproduce … year 2006 the United Kingdom created a Tribunal Service, which was later merged with the Courts Service in 2010, resulting in the creation of a single cohesive judicial structure and service for the country. 5 Drewry, Gavin, … be set up to attain them must still retain its basic judicial 86 character and inspire public confidence. Any scheme of decentralisation of administration of … petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in an appeal under Sub-Section (2) and (2A) of Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with applicable provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944, can examine and go into the question … judgments :CCE, Delhi-1 Vs. Kundalia Industries, 2012 (279) ELT351(Delhi); CCE, Delhi-III Vs. B.E. Office Automation Products Pvt. Ltd., 2010 (249) ELT24(P&H); CCE, Noida Vs. V.S. Exim Pvt. Ltd., 2012 (283) ELT206(Tri.-Delhi); CCE, Noida Vs. Super Cassettes Industries

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S.Sri Chaitanya Educational C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35G; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65 (26) (27), 73(1), 76, 77, 78; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 136; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 12A; Customs Act - Section 129E

service attracts levy of service tax under Sections 65 (26) and (27) read with sub-section (105)(zzc) of the Finance Act, 1994. After coming into force of the amendment to Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, in spite of … the show cause notice, the Commissioner may conduct such enquiry and pass an order which is appealable under Section 86 before the CESTAT. Section 86(7) mutatis mutandis applies the same procedure and powers exercised by the CESTAT in

Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs. M. Palanimuthu

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

order dated 10.12.2010 has been passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994 which were initiated under a Show Cause Notice No. 7/2010 (Revision) dated 8.6.2010 under the said Section … counsel for the respondents points out that the reviewing power of the Committee of Chief Commissioners under Section 86(2) covers only orders passed by the Commissioner under Section 73 or Section 83A of the Finance Act, 1994

Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs. M/S. Kodai Automobiles Ltd ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

order dated 13.12.2010 has been passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994 dropping the proceedings which were initiated under a Show Cause Notice dated 24.2.2010 under the said Section … counsel for the respondents points out that the reviewing power of the Committee of Chief Commissioners under Section 86(2) covers only orders passed by the Commissioner under Section 73 or Section 83A of the Finance Act, 1994

State Bank of India vs the Principal Commissioner of Central GST North ...

Court : Karnataka

as well as the Appellate Order, the appellant/SBI filed appeal before the CESTAT under Section 86(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. The CESTAT videjudgment dated 22.11.2017 dismissed the appeal holdingthat the relevant date for the purpose of refund

m/s.Navasakthi Township Developers Pvt ltd Vs Commissioner of Central ...

Court : Chennai

the delay in filing the appeal beyond three months, as per Clause (5) to Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. 9.The learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the demand that has been confirmed pertains to … counsel for the respondents would submit that the demand that has been confirmed pertains to the tax period 2010-2013 and that the petitioner is not a small concern, but established Real Estate Business Enterprises incorporated under the

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

to the provisions of Section 65 (105)(zzzz) and 65(90a) of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act, 2010 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 2010 on the ground that the said provisions are illegal, arbitrary … 24234/2008, 25280-25286/2008, 27820-27823/2008, 27917 & 27918/2008, 28021 & 28022/2008, 29188/2008, 662/2009, 747 & 748/2009, 2766-2770/2009, 3995/2009, 6346/2009, 8562/2009, 8613/2009, 8827-8846/2009, 9251/2009, 10494/2009, 10997/2009, 11024-11027/2009, 12016/2009, 12268 & 12269/2009, 16251/2009, 17238/2009, 18287/2009, 18795/2009, 19995-20013/2009, 20524/2009, 20580/2009, 21035/2009, 21041/2009,

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Anand Sonbhadra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

mentioned above, we do not find that the lease deed in question can be said to be a finance lease.23. Keeping in view the Indian Accounting Standards, what appears broadly is that when lease involves real estate … owners have a heritable and transferable right under Section 5 and 7 of the U.P. Apartments Flat Owners Act, 2010. THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING A FINANCIAL CREDITOR UNDER THE IBC49 In this context, it is undoubtedly true that … be obtained from the asset by one or more users.” (Emphasis supplied) 86 The lease in question is for a period of ninety years. In