Advanced Search Results

Asmitha Microfin Limited (Asmitha)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

across India. The erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh passed Andhra Pradesh Micro Finance Institutions (Regulation of Money Lending) Act, 2010 regulating the loan disbursement and recovery process for micro finance institutions in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. The provisions … Rs.10/- each. Both the companies are engaged in the business of providing financial and support services to marginalized sections of society particularly underserved rural and urban women across India. The erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh passed Andhra … s case (supra) relied on Palmer s Company Law, 24th Edition, para 79.16 and quoted the following passage and opined that the following illustration is

Ptc India Limited Vs. Jaiprakash Power Ventures Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

included the power to ‘determine’. Referring to the decision in Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Limited (2011) 5 SCC 53 it was submitted that disputes where rights in rem were involved were not … survived between them. 16. The Petitioner by its letter dated 13th January 2010 protested against the above decision of Japyee Karcham. It filed OMP No.25 … 1. In this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act’) PTC India Limited, the Petitioner, has challenged the impugned majority … of the tariff in respect of the four categories of cases specified in Section 62(1) and not under Section 79(1)(a) and (b) and Section 86(1)(a) of the EA. It was held that the provisions of Section 79(1) (a)

Commissioner of Salem Municipal Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Centra ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Service Tax was introduced on renting of immovable property service with effect from 01.6.2007 by the amendment of Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act, 2007. Further by the amendment in the year 2010, certain other immovable properties were … 9,80,442.00 31.10.2012 : Rs. 5,82,823.00 05.11.2012 : Rs.22,39,370.00 3. According to the petitioner, the respondent has wrongly interpreted Section 11(A)(1) of the Central Excise Act and Section 73(1) of the Finance Act in invoking the extended period

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … dispute in the present case pertains to period from 2005-06 to 2009-10. 7. In the month of July, 2010, investigations were conducted by the officers of Service Tax Cell of Central Excise Headquarters, Nagpur, in connection with … of Income Tax vs. Shaw Wallace and Co. (AIR 1932 SC 138). 79. The second submission of Mr. Sridharan is that the term road is

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

to the provisions of Section 65 (105)(zzzz) and 65(90a) of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act, 2010 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 2010 on the ground that the said provisions are illegal, arbitrary … the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in Home Solutions-I case, the impugned notice is unsustainable in law. 79 This Court, following the decision rendered by the Full Bench of Delhi High Court in Home Solutions-II case

Commissioner of Income Tax -xiii Vs. Rajinder Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

the said decision, it has been held that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act amended by Finance Act, 2010 has retrospective effect.9. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the decision of the Calcutta High Court in … note on clauses and the memorandum explaining the amendments to Section 40(a)(ia) reproduced in (2010) 321 ITR Statutes 79 reads:“Notes on Clauses: Clause 12 of the Bill seeks to amend section 40 of the Income-tax Act relating

Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla Vs. National Law School of India University, Be ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Bench of this Court in the above case had occasion to consider various provisions of Electricity Act, 2003. Section 79 of the Act enumerated the functions of Central Commission whereas Section 178 empowers the Central Commission to make … and their appointment, powers, functions and other matters relating to them and all other matters relating to the finances, powers, teaching, administration and management of the affairs of the School shall, subject to the provisions of this

The Commissioner of Income Tax-ii Vs. M/S. Brahma Associates

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act,1961 - Section 80IB(10); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Section 2(ea)

of the aggregate built-up area of the housing project or two thousand square feet whichever is less. By Finance Act, 2010 clause (d) is amended with effect from 1/4/2010. It provides that Section 80IB(10) deduction would be available where

Linde Ag, Linde Engineering Division and anr. Vs. Deputy Director of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

any income from any source in India.” 78. Explanation to Section 9(2) of the Act, as amended by Finance Act 2010 with retrospective effect from 01.06.1976 is quoted below:“Explanation.- For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that … or place of business or business connection in India; or (ii) the non-resident has rendered services in India.” 79. In terms of Section 9(1)(i) of the Act, all income which accrues or arises directly or indirectly from

M/S V2 Associates vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

(1) of S.25, at least, in cases to which the provision in S.25(l) as amended by the Kerala Finance Act, 2010 and the later amendments sustaining that provision or conferring power of enlargement of time applies. Obviously, even if … of this Court inSujatha.M. v Secretary, Cochin Devaswom Board, Thrissur, 2014(4) KLT 79 which specifically held that the rule of alternate remedy is not an … Kerala Value Added Tax Act, (for short “KVAT Act”) has filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P3 Order under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act and consequent Ext.P5 Demand on the ground it pertains to the Assessment Year