Advanced Search Results

M/S Rochem Separation Systems (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Centra ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

contention of the applicant is that provisions of Rule 6 were retrospectively amended by Section 73 of the Finance Act, 2010 and as per the provisions of retrospective amendment in case where the manufacturer is availing credit in respect

Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 246; Finance Act, 1995 - Section 65(105)(zzzz); Companies Act, 1956; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 105; Indian Easements Act

Finance Act, 2010 are produced below in a tabular form: PRIOR TO FINANCE ACT, 2010 POST AMENDMENT BY FINANCE ACT, 2010 "Section 65 (90a) "renting of "Section 65(90a) "renting of immovable property" includes immovable property" includes renting, letting, leasing, licensing … including renting, letting, leasing, licensing or other similar arrangements in the course or furtherance of business or commerce. 61. In the first Home Solution case, the Division Bench had posed the question whether the renting of immovable

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … appellant being aggrieved by the said order passed by the Tribunal had filed Central Excise Appeal no.116 of 2010 before this Court. By an order dated 18.11.2010 passed by this Court while admitting the appeal filed by … India Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. (1986) 2 SCC 547 61. Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

and standing who have adequate knowledge of, and have shown capacity in, dealing with problems relating to engineering, finance, commerce, economics, law or management”, with the Chairperson being a person who is, or has been, a Judge … the interest of the consumers vis­à­vis recovery of cost of electricity in a reasonable manner as envisaged under Section 61 of the 2003 Act. 1018. Being regulated licensees responsible for distribution and retail supply of electricity in their

Punjab State Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. Punjab State Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Education

company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be, in line with the provisions of the relevant Finance Acts of the respective year during the tariff period shall be trued up separately for each year of … Limited, the Appellant herein, under the Punjab Power Sector Reforms Transfer Scheme, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as Scheme) with effect from 16.04.2010. The appellant has … No.1, State Commission is the Regulatory Commission for the State of Punjab discharging functions and exercising powers under Section 61, 62, 64, 86 and other applicable provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003. (d) that the Respondent No.2 is

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

have been taken over by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereafter “NCLAT”) due to provisions of the Finance Act, 2017. Though by amendments, the petitioners have impugned provisions of the Finance Act nevertheless, they do not press … relied extensively on the observations in Union of India v. R. Gandhi 2010 (11) SCC1and submitted that separation of powers is part of the basic … equality before law, and equal protection of law is violated. Counsel submitted that the bar to jurisdiction under Section 61 of the Act underscores the fact that the task performed by CCI is essentially judicial, ordinarily performed by

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Education

the Board? F. whether the State Commission has erred by adopting a methodology for calculation of interest and finance charges which are not provided for in the Regulations, 2007? G. whether the State Commission has erred in … 6.12.2010 passed by the State Commission in Tariff Petition No. 3 of 2010 for ARR 2010-11. Although, the Appeal was dismissed but this Tribunal, while … (hereinafter called the State Commission) determining ARR and retail tariff for FY 2011-12 in exercise of powers under Section 61, 62 and 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003 contrary to the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, National Tariff

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and 186 (2) of the Finance Act, 2017 as amended by the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 as ultra vires Articles … at its meeting held in Lusaka, Zambia on 21st and 22nd January, 2010 for effective implementation of the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct referred to … Act, 2006; Section 154, Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. 24Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 12 legislature wishes those disputes arising

Director of Income Tax Vs. Ericsson A.B.,new Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

contract..47. Section 9 (1) (i) of the Act as it stood before the amendment to it by the Finance Act, 2010 provides that income accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in India … services rendered by them in erection of the ITA 504/2007, ITA 507/2007, ITA 508/2007,ITA 511/2007, ITA 397/2007 Page 61 of 75 machinery in Midhani unit at Hyderabad. Therefore, the contention of the Revenue that as the amounts

Commissioner of Income Tax Xiii Vs. Naresh Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Talbros (P) Ltd.), has erred in holding that the amendments made to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act by Finance Act, 2010 should be given retrospective effect. The contention of the Revenue is that these amendments are w.e.f. 1st April, … on expenditure of Rs.66,29,926/- as per the following details: Nature Amount Interest 314465 Contractor 5650780 Fees 366586 Rent 612560 INTEREST (GTF) 420829 Total 9. 7365220 The amount of TDS to be deducted has not been stated but