Advanced Search Results

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

to the provisions of Section 65 (105)(zzzz) and 65(90a) of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act, 2010 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 2010 on the ground that the said provisions are illegal, arbitrary … judgment reported in [2012].52 VST409(Raj.).Purshottam Das Malpani versus Union of India and OtheRs.Accordingly, W.P.No.8932 of 2011 is dismissed. 52 In W.P.No.26012 of 2012, the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board has made a challenge to the order dated

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … appellant being aggrieved by the said order passed by the Tribunal had filed Central Excise Appeal no.116 of 2010 before this Court. By an order dated 18.11.2010 passed by this Court while admitting the appeal filed by … (1989(39) ELT 169 (S.C.) (g) Indus Towers Ltd. Vs. CTO, Hyderabad, ((2012) 52 VST 447), (VIII) That it is impossible to conceive that the telecommunication

Bikram Chatterji Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

agreement contained specific terms as to interest. Under Clause 14 of the agreement, the builder authorised itself to finance loan from any financial institution by way of mortgage/charge/securitization of receivable of the land and flats and the … placed on the provisions contained in section 4(5) of the U.P. Apartments (Promotion of Construction, Ownership, and Maintenance) Act, 2010 (for short, the ‘U.P. Apartments Act, 2010’). It is provided that the completion of the construction works of … interest.37. It was further submitted on behalf of the Noida Authority that 52 primarily on account of the global recession in the world economy, in

Cit-7 vs.odeon Builders Pvt. Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

period would have to be interpreted in this context. Strict construction 20. Sub-section (2A) was inserted by the Finance Act 2010, giving powers to the High Court to condone the delay in filing the appeal. There was a difference … 2015 Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing counsel for Revenue in ITA755and 756 of 2015 ITA Nos. 52/2015, 755/2015 & 756/2015 Page 1 of 31 Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Advocate for Respondent in ITA52of 2015 Mr. C.S.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 vs.gulbarga Associates (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

period would have to be interpreted in this context. Strict construction 20. Sub-section (2A) was inserted by the Finance Act 2010, giving powers to the High Court to condone the delay in filing the appeal. There was a difference … 2015 Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing counsel for Revenue in ITA755and 756 of 2015 ITA Nos. 52/2015, 755/2015 & 756/2015 Page 1 of 31 Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Advocate for Respondent in ITA52of 2015 Mr. C.S.

Union of India Vs. Mohit Mineral Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

on the stocks of coal on which writ petitioner had already paid Clean Energy Cess in terms of Finance Act, 2010, he shall not be required to make any further payment. However, on stocks of coal on which no … come into play.” 43. Levy of surcharge was upheld referring to Entry 52 of List II of Seventh Schedule. Following was laid down in paragraph … Tax Compensation Cess Rules, 2017, the 2 Rules framed by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 11 of the Goods and Service Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 are under challenge in these cases.3.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … Annexure I to the Appeal memo is a copy of the Order – In – Appeal No. PIII/VM/267-280/ 2010 dated 20.10.2010. 18. It is stated that further, in view of the above said Order in Appeal passed … effect from such date as the Central Government may, by notification, appoint.” 52. We do not see as to how this Section can be of

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

he submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also … C.A. Nos. 8737-8941/2018, submitted that to comprehend the nature of a licence, one would have to refer to section 52 of the Indian Easements Act 1882. He stressed the fact that the ruling by the AAR in the … fact, this drafting error was rectified in the Draft Taxes Code 105 2010,38 under Chapter XIX in Part H thereof, which set out the definition

Association For Democratics Reforms Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Campaign Finance and its Influence over the Political Process and Public Policy, 52 UIC J.Marshall L. Rev. 185 (2018) 65 See D Sunshine Hillygus, Campaign … establishing the double proportionality standard ...................................................... 103 b) Validity of the Electoral Bond Scheme, Section 11 of the Finance Act and Section 137 of the Finance Act ..................................................... 113 c. Validity of Section 154 of the Finance Act … Effects on Vote Choice in “The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior” (Ed. Jan E. Leighley 2010) 45 PART E is assumed to not possess knowledge of the policy positions of the candidates.66 Campaigns have

Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust Vs. Puma Sports India Pvt.Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

but on reintroduction with the retrospective effect of sub-Clause (zzzz) of Section 65 (105), by virtue of the Finance Act, 2010, the amount was so deposited. Suffice to say that this issue stands resolved with the legal position being … SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO (OS) Nos.440/2012 and 52/2013 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJAY KISHAN