Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … appellant being aggrieved by the said order passed by the Tribunal had filed Central Excise Appeal no.116 of 2010 before this Court. By an order dated 18.11.2010 passed by this Court while admitting the appeal filed by … (AP)) 46Collector of C.E. Vs. Jay Engineering Works Ltd., (1989(39) E.L.T. 169(S.C.) 47. M/s. Annapurna Carbon Industries Co. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1976) 2

Scottish Widows plc (Appellant) Vs. Commissioners for Her Majesty's Re ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Plc ("the Company") and Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs ("HMRC") under para 31 of Schedule 18 to the Finance Act 1998: [2010] CSIH 47, 2010 SLT 885, 2010 STC 2133. The question that was referred to the Special … in line 15 of the Company's form 40 must be taken as falling within the scope of either section 83(2) or section 83(3) of the Finance Act 1989, as substituted by paragraph 16 of Schedule 8 to

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

reported at [2009] UKHL 8, [2009] STC 452. For present purposes, however, it is sufficient to note that section 47 of the Finance Act 1997 curtailed the period for a claim for repayment of VAT from six to … such cases: para 260. It was not open to the Revenue to rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to … to the Supreme Court were lodged by both parties. On 8 November 2010 the panel refused permission on the issue as to which the Court

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

to the provisions of Section 65 (105)(zzzz) and 65(90a) of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act, 2010 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 2010 on the ground that the said provisions are illegal, arbitrary … and buildings generally fall also in the jurisdiction of the State. Reference is made to Entries 45, 46, 47 and 48 of the State List in which certain taxes are to be imposed on land and agricultural

Ms.Eid Parry (India) Limited Vs. the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Section 260A, 43(6), 37, 72A, 32A(6)

laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1986 with effect from 1.4.1988. Explanation 2A was later on inserted by Finance Act, 2000 with effect from 1.4.2000. In the case before us, we are concerned about Explanation 2 only and … holding company and the conditions of clause (iv) or, as the case may be, of clause (v) of section 47 are satisfied; or(b) by the amalgamating company to the amalgamated company in a scheme of amalgamation, and the

Adani Power Ltd. & Anr versus Union of India & Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 2 S.C.R. 1

- ss.12, 25 - Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - s.30 - SEZ Rules, 2006 - r.47(3) - Finance Act, 2010 - Firstly, what, in law, did the Gujarat High Court decide in itsjudgment dated 15 July 2015, and … between 15 September 2010 and 15 February 2016 that would justify a departure from the 2015 ruling - Section 30 of the SEZ Act remained unaltered - Imported electrical energy bore no customs duty under the Customs

Director of Income Tax Vs. Ericsson A.B.,new Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

contract..47. Section 9 (1) (i) of the Act as it stood before the amendment to it by the Finance Act, 2010 provides that income accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in India

Amazon.com Nv Investment Holdings Llc Vs. Future Retail Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

shareholders of FRL (vi) Respondents No.12 and 13 - Future Corporate Resources Pvt. Ltd. and Akar Estate and Finance Pvt. Ltd., group companies of FRL2Respondents No.1 to 13 are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Biyani Group”. … a foreign award as a deemed decree of the High Court concerned [as per the amended Explanation to Section 47 by Act 3 of 2016 confers exclusive jurisdiction on the High Court for execution of foreign awards]. would

M/s. Mascon Multiservices and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Oman Re ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(2009) 8 SCC 520, Mussafar Shah Vs. MMTC 83 2000 Delhi LT 514 and Saurabh Kalani Vs. Tata Finance Ltd. 2003(3) Arb.LR 345 (Bom) (DB)) 201. Hence the petitioner must show special bias in this claim. The … 5th March, 2010 which has been challenged in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) essentially as being vitiated by bias and upon the Arbitrator not having considered the evidence … required from all or some of such authorities was specified to be 475. The rate at which the petitioner was to be paid was Rs.50,000/-

Suresh Kumar Bansal and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the amount as may be determined in the prescribed manner. 41. Prior to the amendment brought about by Finance Act 2010, Section 67 of the Act provided that the value of taxable services would be the gross amount charged by … of the lists. See the observations of this Court in H.R. Banthia v. Union of India: [1970]1 SCR 479, Union of India v. H.S. Dhillon: [1972] 83 ITR 582(SC). The lists are designed to define and delimit