Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … appellant being aggrieved by the said order passed by the Tribunal had filed Central Excise Appeal no.116 of 2010 before this Court. By an order dated 18.11.2010 passed by this Court while admitting the appeal filed by

M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory S. Nagara ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Entry 54, List-II of the Constitution as ultravires Entry 97, List-I read with Section 65 (109a) of the Finance Act, 1994 unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 245, 246, 265, 366(12) and 366(29A) of the Constitution of … Constitution of India praying to call for records pertaining to the re-assessment orders of DCCT-Bangalore dated 18th June 2010 in respect of tax demand under KST/KVAT Acts for the Assessment Year/Period commencing from April 2001 to March … reassessment orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act (for short ‘VAT Act’) and

M/S.Sriram Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd., Stone H Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pvt. Ltd., Stone Housepet, Nellore, Nellore District, rep. by its Managing Director and another...Petitioners The Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Director and others... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri … SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.17435 of 2008 and 15771 of 2010 Common Order: These two writ petitions are disposed of by a common … notice was given to him by the Committee on its stand and the Government could not have invoked Section 39 of SFC Act. The directions are wholly without jurisdiction and by no stretch of imagination can be called

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … Annexure I to the Appeal memo is a copy of the Order – In – Appeal No. PIII/VM/267-280/ 2010 dated 20.10.2010. 18. It is stated that further, in view of the above said Order in Appeal passed … not dealt with the same vitiates the order passed by the CESTAT. 39. In support of the above submissions Mr.Sridharan has placed reliance upon the

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

the Act, it shall 21 Inserted by the Finance Act 2017, sec. 39 (w.e.f. 1-4-2018). 33 have the same meaning as assigned to it in … he submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also … scientific work. As a matter of fact, this drafting error was rectified in the Draft Taxes Code 105 2010,38 under Chapter XIX in Part H thereof, which set out the definition of “royalty” as follows: “PART H

Union of India Vs. Mohit Mineral Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

on the stocks of coal on which writ petitioner had already paid Clean Energy Cess in terms of Finance Act, 2010, he shall not be required to make any further payment. However, on stocks of coal on which no … (“no contrary opinion was expressed by majority in that regard”) in paragraph 39, which is to the following effect:­ “39. Now the health cess is … Tax Compensation Cess Rules, 2017, the 2 Rules framed by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 11 of the Goods and Service Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 are under challenge in these cases.3.

M/S. Sky Gourmet Catering Private Limited Vs. the Assistant Commission ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

65 (105) (zzt) of the Service Tax Act. Therefore, the assessee is registered under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. The assessee is paying service tax on the gross amounts received by it towards handling charges, transportation, … the customers. They also verified the receipts showing tax payments. Thereafter, a notice dated 23.1.2010 was issued under Section 39(1) of the Act for the period of 01.4.2005 to 31.03.2009 calling upon the assessee to show cause why

M/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Naga ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

relevant point of time. 5. BSNL got itself registered under the provisions of the Service Tax under the Finance Act, 1994 and paying service tax regularly. BSNL also got registered under the provisions of Karnataka Sales Tax Act … submissions before the 3rd respondent. Subsequently, the 3rd respondent issued a notice under Section 12-A of the KST Act/Section 39 of the KVAT Act dated 03.02.2009 and 04.05.2009 and directed the BSNL to furnish information with regard to

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

impregnated seed is a service, and this is liable to be taxed under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act as amended, read with the Rules that pertain to service tax. This is a central levy. The transaction … sales tax regime, and this covers lease transactions, attracting a tax of 4% (increased to 5% since April, 2010) on the basis of the rate specified under the Schedule. This entry expressly includes technical know - how. … Added Tax Act, 2002 ( the MVAT Act ); the definitions under Sections 65(105)(zzr), 65(55a) and 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994; and sub-clause (c) … Article 226 of the Constitution of India, brings a challenge to Entry 39 of Schedule C to the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : Land Acquisition

'consumer' under section 2(f)(ii) of the Act. It was also urged that the reliance on section 65 of Finance Act, 2010 were also not apposite as this was not a 'service'. 37. It was urged that there were number … and were in order. The Appellant refuted the contentions regarding violation of FAR and density per acre norms. 39. It was pointed out that initially itself the apartment owners had agreed that the Appellant could increase the