Advanced Search Results

Kerala State Insurance Department Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(2)KLT941; 2012(2)KHC683

the obligation as above and hence there is no 'taxable service', as contemplated under Section 65(12) of the Finance Act , 1994 to be mulcted with any liability. Still, the petitioner had submitted an application for registration and … Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972. 2. The parties and proceedings are referred to, as arrayed in W.P.(C)No.15892 OF 2008, treating the same as the lead case. The case of the petitioner/State Insurance Department is that their constitution

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Commissioner Service Tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

not be demanded and recovered under the proviso to the Section 73(1) read with Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and education cess under Section 95 of Finance Act … ₹7,19,01,91 0 t - (three SCNs) which they have not paid during the period May, 2006 to March, 2008, should not be recovered under Section 75 of the Finance Act. 1994; (iii) Penalty should not be imposed

Union of India Through the Secretary, Department of Personnel & Tr ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the Court was dealing with clause (iii) of Section 95 W.P. (C) No.8758/2014 Page 19 of 22 of Finance Act, 1995 which prescribes that the provisions of Section 95 shall not apply to any person in respect of … 1965 and accordingly the sealed cover procedure was followed by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) held between December, 2008 and January, 2009 while considering him and others for promotion to the post of Commissioner of Income Tax.

Wipro Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

of the Finance Act, 1994; and (b) education cess on taxable service levied under section 91 read with section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004). Explanation 2. duty for the purposes of this notification … the appellant, it was liable to pay service tax under the relevant provisions of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The Export of Service Rules, 2005 were framed by notification No.9/2005-ST on 03.03.2005. Rule 5 of the

Tata Steel Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 7, 7(2), 7(3), 22, 46 and 46(4); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5); Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18, 95, 95(3) and 96(3); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1981; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Sections 84 and 85; Orissa Sales Tax Act - Sections 6; State General Sales Tax Act; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Central Sales Tax (Bihar) Rules, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 299, 301 and 304

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1153; [2007(2)JCR180(Jhr)]; (2007)7VST109(Jharkh)

the sale of goods produced from 1st August, 2000 to 31st July, 2008 in terms of Section 7(2)(b) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981. It … challenge is made to Notification No. S.O.201 dated 30th March, 2006, issued under Section 7(3)(b) of' the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, whereby and whereunder, Notification Nos. S.O.478 dated 22nd December, 1995, S.O.57 dated 2nd March, 2000, S.O.479 dated … 22nd December, 2005 has been withdrawn. Apart from challenging the aforementioned notifications, constitutional validity of the provisions of Section 95(3)(ii) and Section 96(3) of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 is also questioned. In view of the

Niko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 80-IA to Section 80-IB and the said Section 80-IB with effect from 1.4.2002, till its amendment by Finance Act, 2008 reads as under :- "80-IB(1) Where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and gains

Niko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 80-IA to Section 80-IB and the said Section 80-IB with effect from 1.4.2002, till its amendment by Finance Act, 2008 reads as under :- "80-IB(1) Where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and gains

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … a fund under Section 91; and its accounts were mandatorily audited by the State’s Accountant General under Section 95.38. It was argued that like AUDA, the GIDC too was also set up by virtue of a statute27,

Contai Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Uday Chandra Dey

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Banking

Acts : West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - Sections 49, 95, 95(1), 95(2), 134 and 134(2); ;Specific Relief Act - Section 38; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 9 - Order 7, Rule 11; ;West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 86 and 132

Reported in : (2008)4CALLT353(HC)

Matched in: Citation (2008)4CALLT353(HC)

Shakti Tubes Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions of the ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Bihar Finance Act - Sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 7(1), 7(3), 12 and 21; ;Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2010(58)BLJR159

Ltd. v. State of Bihar), whereby the order passed by the authorities under the provisions of the Bihar Finance Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), has been upheld, and it has been held that the petitioner is … 10.4 of the 1993 Industrial Policy, the State Government issued S.O. No. 95, dated 4.4.1994 (Annexure 2), along with the forms appended thereto, purporting to … before 1.4.1993, and its capital investment was less than Rs. 15 crores.3. In view of the provisions of Section 7(3)(b) of the Act, and in purported exercise of powers under Paragraph 10.5 read with the provision of