Advanced Search Results
Madura Coats Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Gujarat
Jul-03-2012
Excise
Act by way of an amendment inserted with effect from May 10, 2008 by Section 85 of the Finance Act, 2008 (18 of 2008). Therefore, we clarify that the petitioner is entitled to interest @ 12% per annum on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask…appellant/Petitioner Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata Iv ...
Kolkata
Jul-03-2012
Excise
Act by way of an amendment inserted with effect from May 10, 2008 by Section 85 of the Finance Act, 2008 (18 of 2008).Therefore, we clarify that the petitioner is entitled to interest @ 12% per annum on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadura Coats Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Gujarat
Jul-03-2012
Excise
Act by way of an amendment inserted with effect from May 10, 2008 by Section 85 of the Finance Act, 2008 (18 of 2008). Therefore, we clarify that the petitioner is entitled to interest @ 12% per annum on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.R.Venugopalan Nair Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-23-2015
Land Acquisition
getting pension from the KSEB. For the 6th respondent it is pleaded that he is functioning as Member, Finance in the KSEB. He being in charge of managing financial affairs of the Board has deep interest in … the 5th respondent has been working as State Electricity Ombudsman from June 2008 onwards. It was further stated that the 5th respondent had retired as … Board has deep interest in the financial well being of the KSEB. It is pleaded that according to Section 85(5) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "the 2003 Act") no person who have financial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Gowrishankar Vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals)-I, Chenn ...
Chennai
Jun-13-2016
Land Acquisition
Section 78 of the Finance Act. 3. Being aggrieved by the same, the appellant filed an appeal under Section 85 of the Finance Act, to the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals)-I, Chennai, 1st respondent herein, with a delay … No.23/2009, dated 28.07.2009 respectively, under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, r/w. Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. He also demanded interest, applicable at the rate payable on the above mentioned demands, under Rule 14 … placed on the decisions in Singh Enterprises v. CCE, Jamshedpur reported in 2008 (221) ELT 163 (SC), Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise v. Hongo
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
have been taken over by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereafter “NCLAT”) due to provisions of the Finance Act, 2017. Though by amendments, the petitioners have impugned provisions of the Finance Act nevertheless, they do not press … sector) and the Airports Economic Regulatory W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 66 of 152 Authority of India Act, 2008 (regulating the airports segment) have followed different evolutionary paths. These laws have also been amended, to cater to … as to verification of digital signature; (f) section 81-A - presumption as to Gazettes in electronic forms; (g) section 85-A - presumption as to electronic agreements; (h) section 85-B - presumption as to electronic records and electronic signatures;
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs T a Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Sanjeev Kumar Jha Vs. The Un ...
Jharkhand
Apr-07-2015
Land Acquisition
of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … Supreme Court in the case of Singh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Jamshedpur and others reported in 2008(3) SCC70in Paragraph no. 3 to 10 which reads as under:3. The Division Bench noted that since the Commissioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs Ramchandra Singh Through Its Proprietor Ramchandra Singh Vs. The Un ...
Jharkhand
Jul-08-2015
Land Acquisition
the petitioners of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/RAN/2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … Supreme Court in the case of Singh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Jamshedpur and others reported in 2008(3) SCC 70 in paragraph no. 3 to 10 which reads as under: “3. The Division Bench noted that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilip Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Union of India Through Central Excise and Serv ...
Jharkhand
Jul-15-2015
Land Acquisition
of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … Supreme Court in the case of Singh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Jamshedpur and others reported in 2008(3) SCC70in Paragraph no. 3 to 10 which reads as under:“3. The Division Bench noted that since the Commissioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Jmj Constructions, Rep. by Its Managing Partner Vs. the Assistant ...
Chennai
Aug-13-2012
Service Tax
the case, had refused to condone the delay stating that he does not have the power, as per Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, to condone the delay of over three months. Accordingly, he had passed the … under the impression that it had paid the entire service tax, in terms of Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. However, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem-I Division, the first respondent herein, had issued a show
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »