Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 section 77 · Page 1 of about 999 results (0.043 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 2015

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Commissioner Service Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2015

Subject : Service Tax

which they have not paid during the period May, 2006 to March, 2008, should not be recovered under Section 75 of the Finance Act. 1994; … amounting to ₹7,19,01,910/-(three SCNs) on the said services as stated above; (iv) Penalty should not be imposed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended in view of failure to get registered and furnish prescribed returns … not be demanded and recovered under the proviso to the Section 73(1) read with Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and education cess under Section 95 of Finance Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2015

Ms T a Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Sanjeev Kumar Jha Vs. The Un ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-07-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

There was violation of certain circulars and rules of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalty was also affirmed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.Thus, 3 there was no ambiguity at all. So far as liability of this … of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … Singh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Jamshedpur and others reported in 2008(3) SCC70in Paragraph no. 3 to 10 which reads as under:3. The Division

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2015

Ms Ramchandra Singh Through Its Proprietor Ramchandra Singh Vs. The Un ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-08-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

There was violation of certain circulars and rules of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalty was also affirmed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. Thus, there was no ambiguity at all. So far as liability of this … the petitioners of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/RAN/2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … Singh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Jamshedpur and others reported in 2008(3) SCC 70 in paragraph no. 3 to 10 which reads as under:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 15 2015

Dilip Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Union of India Through Central Excise and Serv ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

There was violation of certain circulars and rules of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalty was also affirmed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.Thus, there was no ambiguity at all. So far as 3 liability of this … of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … Singh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Jamshedpur and others reported in 2008(3) SCC70in Paragraph no. 3 to 10 which reads as under:“3. The Division

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2014

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-20-2014

Subject : Service Tax

and ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2008. 36 In view of paragraph no.30 above, upholding the validity of Section 65(105)(zzzz) and 65(90-a) of the FinanceSection 65 (105)(zzzz) and 65(90a) of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act, 2010 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 2010 on the ground that the said provisions are illegal, arbitrary and ultra vires

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2025

M/S Stemcyte India Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. versus Commissioner of Centr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.70

disputed period and thus, whether eligible for exemption from payment of service tax during the said period. Headnotes† Finance Act, 1994 - Exemption notification - “Healthcare Services” - Exemption from payment of service tax - Entitlement to - … company of M/s. Stemcyte Inc., USA, M/s. Apollo Hospital Enterprises Ltd., and M/s. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., established in 2008. It is engaged in the collection, processing, testing, and storage of umbilical cord blood units and their therapeutic … between 01.07.2012 and 16.02.2014, and also proposed imposition of penalties under sections 77(1)(a), 77(1)(d), 77(2) and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant filed … to show cause why their refund claim should not be rejected under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant filed a written

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2016

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-2016

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Parties Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue and Others

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2008

Devi Constructions Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-15-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11D and 35F; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 73(2), 76, 77 and 78; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57CC; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001 - Rule 6; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : (2008)221CTR(Mad)72; 2008[12]STR691; [2009]19STT461; (2008)18VST415(Mad)

Matched in: Citation (2008)221CTR(Mad)72; 2008[12]STR691; [2009]19STT461; (2008)18VST415(Mad)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … the context.” 82 (2018) 11 SCC50883 (1980) 2 SCC32284 Halsbury’s Laws of England, Vol. 32 para 487 48 77. Likewise, with regard to “business” the counsel referred to H. Abdul Bakhi & Bros. (supra) which had discussed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2020

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. M/S Adani Gas Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2020

Subject : Service Tax

14 Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act 1994 was introduced by Notification No.18/2008-S.T. with effect from 16 May 2008. Section 65(105)(zzzzj) levies a service tax on the use of tangible goods. On the other 11 hand, the transfer … should not be demanded together with interest and penalties under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. 6 “Show Cause Notice” 3 … pipes and measuring 1 “Tribunal” 2 “Adjudicating Authority” 1 equipment to its customers under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994. This appeal rests on the interpretation and applicability of the provisions of Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial