Advanced Search Results

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Commissioner Service Tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

which they have not paid during the period May, 2006 to March, 2008, should not be recovered under Section 75 of the Finance Act. 1994; … not be demanded and recovered under the proviso to the Section 73(1) read with Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and education cess under Section 95 of Finance Act … for each of the three periods, ₹5,000/- under Section 77(1) for not obtaining the registration in accordance with Section 69, ₹5,000/- under Section 77(2) generally for the contravention of the statutory provisions relating to the service tax and

M/S Sigpack Associates vs the Commissioner,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

the assessee had failed to -7-register themselves within 30 days of the commencement of service as required under Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994, therefore, they are liable for imposition for penalty under Section 77 of the … BPCL are classifiable under the category of 'Works Contract Service' under the provisions of Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994? -5-(b) Whether the tax not paid/levied is recoverable under Section 73 (1) of the Finance Act, 1994?(c)

Rakesh Kumar Goyal Vs. Nct of Delhi and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Customs for the purpose of Section 108 of the Customs Act. By Section 69 of the Finance Act, 2008 Section 108 (1) of the Act was amended so as to remove the words “duly empowered by the Central

Saket Aggarwal Vs. Directorate of Revenue

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Customs for the purpose of Section 108 of the Customs Act. By Section 69 of the Finance Act, 2008 Section 108 (1) of the Act was amended so as to remove the words duly empowered by the Central

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

and ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2008. 36 In view of paragraph no.30 above, upholding the validity of Section 65(105)(zzzz) and 65(90-a) of the Finance … notice would disclose that the petitioner was called upon to get itself registered with the Department as per Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 and to pay Service Tax as per Section 68 read with Section 66

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

BY ITS SECRETARY, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.4. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - … exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … is that the current version of Section 79 also does not empower the State to issue blocking orders. Section 69, according to the averment in the petition, was the sole mechanism for the Government of India to issue

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Credit Rules, 2004 iii. When the amendment to Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 by the Finance Act, 2010 is optional to the respondent and the respondent has to opt to avail the benefit provided in … law : "i. When the Notification No.10/2008 CE (NT) dated 1st March 2008 brought the amendment to Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 … inputs for the aforesaid purpose and does not take credit of the specified duty on such inputs." 12. Section 69(2) of the Finance Act, 2010 brought in Rule 57CCC, which provided for making such reversal of the entry

Commissioner of Income Tax -xiii Vs. Rajinder Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

The assessee was asked to explain why disallowance should not be made under Section 40(a)(ia) as amended by Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 2005. The assessee filed written submissions that they had not claimed any

Enercon (India) Ltd. and Others Vs. Enercon Gmbh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

buttress the said submission by referring to the clauses mentioned in the IPLA, regarding the grant of licences, finance, tenure of the IPLA; iv] That the patents in respect of which the licences were to be given … Mehras i.e. the Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 filed Company Petition No.74 of 2008 against the Respondent No.1, Dr.Wobben and Mr. H D Ketwigg alleging oppression … and would require clarification. vii] That no steps were taken for registration of the patents as required by Section 69 of the Patents Act, as both the parties treated it as not a concluded contract. viii] That the

Surendra M. Khandhar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69, 132, 132A, 132A(1), 132B, 132(4), 132(4A), 132(5), 133, 133A, and 271(1); Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 292C

Reported in : (2009)224CTR(Bom)409

the case of Metrani (supra), the IT Act has been amended and Section 292C has been inserted by Finance Act, 2007 w.e.f. 1st Oct., 1975. The effect of said amendment is that where the document is seized in … is also invited to the order of this Court dt. 25th Aug., 2008 where this Court directed that the file pertaining to the case of … on the seized document made an addition of Rs. 20 lakhs in the income of the assessee under Section 69 as unidentified investment. Penalty proceedings were also initiated under Section 271(1)(c).4. In the appeal memo filed before the