Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 section 53 · Page 1 of about 1,338 results (0.054 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 13 2015

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … of Clause 22 of the Special Conditions of Contract and other terms of the contract. On 1st April, 2008, the respondent denied admissibility of reimbursement of service tax and contended that the service tax was deemed to … service tax even though the same was effective at a later date. 53. Learned arbitrator has also held that the petitioner had raised the issue … 1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2026

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … Notes dated 19.07.2008 for the previous year ending on 31.03.2008 and for the period from 01.04.2008 to June, 2008, sought Service Tax from the Plaintiff, at the rate of 12.36%. They informed the Plaintiff that renting of … the period commencing from 16.08.2009 till date, as per second Lease Deed. 53. The Plaintiff thus, paid Service Tax amounting to Rs.7,61,185/- for the aforesaid … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2017

Delhi International Airport P. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2017

Subject : Service Tax

inter-alia seek the relief of declaration that the provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the said Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2007 are ultra-vires Entry 18 Entry 45 and Entry 49 of List-II … service provided or to be provided:-"(a) ....... (zze) to a franchisee, by the franchisor in relation to franchise” 53. For a service to be taxable, it should be a service provided or to be provided by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 14 2017

Mumbai International Airport p.ltd vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2017

Subject : Service Tax

inter-alia seek the relief of declaration that the provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the said Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2007 are ultra-vires Entry 18 Entry 45 and Entry 49 of List-II … service provided or to be provided:-"(a) ....... (zze) to a franchisee, by the franchisor in relation to franchise” 53. For a service to be taxable, it should be a service provided or to be provided by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2020

Shree Choudhary Transport Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-29-2020

Subject : Direct Taxation

tax within prescribed time. In fact, even before the year 2010, the said proviso was amended by the Finance Act 2008 and that amendment of the year 2008 was provided retrospective operation by the legislature itself. For ready reference, … the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139: *** *** 53 Provided that where in respect of any such sum, tax has been … the assessment year 2005-2006 with disallowance of payments to the tune of Rs. 57,11,625/-, essentially in terms of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 19611, for failure of the assessee- appellant to deduct the requisite tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2015

Commissioner of Income-tax, Faridabad Vs. Kapil Kumar Agarwal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-04-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

computed as per clauses (a) and (b) of sub section (1) of Section 54F of the Act. 11. Finance Act, 1987 had inserted sub section (4) of Section 54F of the Act effective from 1.4.1988. According to sub … by the Tribunal that the assessee had made investment in between February 2008 upto August 2008 i.e. well within the stipulated period. The property was … provisions expires. In such cases, the threshold deduction of ten thousand rupees as well as the deduction under section 53 will not be admissible. Further, the tax payer shall be entitled to withdraw such amount in accordance with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2010

Vodafone International Holdings B.V. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-2010

Subject : Company Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 211(3A), Companies Act, 1956 - Section 372; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 2, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 2(14), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 2(47), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 4, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 4(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 5, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 5(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 5(2), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 9, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 9(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 10(15), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 10(33), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 14A, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 45, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 47, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 90, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 94(7), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 133(6), Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 163, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 192

not competent to treat the Petitioner as an assessee in default under Section 201, as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 and the amendment to Section 201 by the Finance Act, 2008 is unconstitutional. We have not considered it … jurisprudence :4 (1936) AC 1 (HL).5 (1926) AC 395.6 (1988) 3 ALL ER 495.7 (1984) 1 All ER 530 (HL).8 (1982) AC 300.9 (1985) 154 ITR 148.(i) A transaction or arrangement which is permissible under law which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2015

Hamdard Laboratories India and Another Vs. Assistant Director of Incom ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2015

Subject : Education

of Hamdard's objects prior to 01.04.2009 is concerned. In light of the amendment to Section 2(15) introduced by Finance Act, 2008, the revenue argues that Hamdard ceases to be a charitable organisation with effect from 01.04.2009 and cites it … 10.07.2013). Therefore, this Court proceeds to examine this issue first. Grounds for withdrawal of exemption under Section 10(23C)(iv) 53. In the order dated 28.12.2007, the DGIT(E), while granting exemption to Hamdard under Section 10 (23C)(iv) of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2012

Enercon (India) Ltd. and Others Vs. Enercon Gmbh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-05-2012

Subject : Arbitration

buttress the said submission by referring to the clauses mentioned in the IPLA, regarding the grant of licences, finance, tenure of the IPLA; iv] That the patents in respect of which the licences were to be given … Mehras i.e. the Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 filed Company Petition No.74 of 2008 against the Respondent No.1, Dr.Wobben and Mr. H D Ketwigg alleging oppression … came to be set aside, resulting in the Application filed under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 being allowed in terms of prayer clause 28(a) thereof, and the Injunction Application of the Petitioners above-named, … SukanyaHoldings (P) Ltd. v. Jayesh H. Pandya and Another [(2003) 5 SCC 531 is misplaced. Therein, not only a suit for dissolution of the firm

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2016

Raymond Limited Vs. Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-20-2016

Subject : MRTP

Wodka KG Vs. John Distilleries Ltd. 2011(4) Mh.L.J. 842 KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v. KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Ltd. in Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 Ford Motor Company and Anr. v. C.R.Borman and Anr. … No.4019 of 2007 Ford Motor Company and Anr. v. C.R.Borman and Anr. 2008 SCC Online Del 1211 Industria De Diseno Textile SA v. Oriental Cuisines … some information about the contents of the site. 53. While the plaintiff is the registered user of … written in a broad lettering and style and is an original artistic work as contemplated in the Copyright Act, 1957 registered under the Act with effect from 20th December, 1993 and the registration is still valid. The … part of their corporate name. The Plaintiffs also filed a complaint under Section 20/22 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956. The Registrar of the Companies

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial