Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … (1989(39) ELT 169 (S.C.) (g) Indus Towers Ltd. Vs. CTO, Hyderabad, ((2012) 52 VST 447), (VIII) That it is impossible to conceive that the telecommunication

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

and ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2008. 36 In view of paragraph no.30 above, upholding the validity of Section 65(105)(zzzz) and 65(90-a) of the Finance … judgment reported in [2012].52 VST409(Raj.).Purshottam Das Malpani versus Union of India and OtheRs.Accordingly, W.P.No.8932 of 2011 is dismissed. 52 In W.P.No.26012 of 2012, the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board has made a challenge to the order dated

Vatika Farms Private Limited Through Its Director, Sh. Anil Bhalla and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(Del)37; 2008(102)DRJ356; [2008]98ITR302(Delhi)

Matched in: Citation (2008)216CTR(Del)37; 2008(102)DRJ356; [2008]98ITR302(Delhi)

Ericsson Ab Vs. Addl. Director of Income Tax, Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Pepsico India Holdings) Vs. Deputy Commissioner ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Aspect Software Inc Vs. Astt. Director of International Taxation and O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Merged With Pepsico India Ho Vs. Deputy Commissi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. (Now Merged With Pepsico Ind Vs. Assistant Commi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Act then it would be open to the AO to disallow such claim for deduction. Similarly, vide the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-4-2008 sub-section (6) has been 87 inserted in Section 195 which requires the payer to furnish information … C.A. Nos. 8737-8941/2018, submitted that to comprehend the nature of a licence, one would have to refer to section 52 of the Indian Easements Act 1882. He stressed the fact that the ruling by the AAR in the