Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Concord Pharmaceuticals

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 37(4), 90, 90(2), 119, 253(2), 260A, 263, 268A, 268A(1), 268A(4), 268A(5) and 275(1); Finance Act, 2008; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3(1A) and 60; Income Tax Rules - Rule 47; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 - Rules 6 to 15

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Guj)117; [2009]317ITR395(Guj)

Matched in: Citation (2008)220CTR(Guj)117; [2009]317ITR395(Guj)

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

vires the Constitution of India. The impugned provision which was brought on to the statute book by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from (w.r.e.f.) 01.04.1989, has resulted in a grievance in so far as the petitioners/assessees are … Rajiv Shakdher, J1. The captioned writ petitions lay challenge to the provisions of Section 271(1B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the =Act) on the ground that it … made the following main prayers in their respective writ petitions:Writ petition No. 5059/2008i) That the impugned Sub-section (1B) of Section 271 of the Act may

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Commissioner of Income Tax -xiii Vs. Rajinder Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

The assessee was asked to explain why disallowance should not be made under Section 40(a)(ia) as amended by Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 2005. The assessee filed written submissions that they had not claimed any … decision of the tribunal in Bharati Shipyard Limited versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (2011) 11 ITR Tribunal 599 in support. Reference is also made to the decision of the Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income

M/S. Suzlon Infrastructure Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune.ii ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

of service tax under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning or Installation service’ as defined in Sec,65(39a) of the Finance Act, 1994, the officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI), New Delhi conducted investigation into the matter. … Nicco Corporation Ltd. vs. CCE, Calcutta - 2006(203)ELT 362(S.C) and (2) Skytone Electricals (India) Ltd. vs. Commissioner - 2008 (225) ELT A 97 (S.C) . 10.3 We have gone through the judgments. In both the judgments, the … to impose penalty on it under Sec.76 for contravention of provisions of Section 68 and penalty under Section 78 of Chapter V of the Finance … of the case, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. 5. Supporting the contention of the Commissioner, the Ld.Consultant for the Revenue, submitted

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Shanti Parshad JaIn and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)246

Revenue to challenge its correctness in the case of other assessees, without just cause. No doubt, by the Finance Act, 2008, Section 268A has been inserted with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999 as under:268A. Filing of appeal or application … reference applications in WT Case Nos. 13 of 1984, 20 of 1985, 21 of 1985 (Shanti Parshad Jain v. CWT), 10 of 1984, 36 of 1985, 37 of 1985 (CWT v. Shanti Parshad), WT Case Nos. 14

Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245A, 245(2A), 245C, 245C(1), 245C(3), 245D, 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(2A), 245D(2B), 245D(2C), 245D(2D), 245D(4), 245D(4A), 245D(4A)(1), 45D(4A)(2A), 45D(4A)(2D), 245D(4A)(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245HA, 245HA(3), 245(I), 245(4), 246C, 245HA(1), 245HA(2), 245HA(3) and 254(2A); Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008 - Sections 273AA, 273AA(1), 273AA(3), 278AB, 278AB(1) and 278AB(3); Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 1975; Wealth-tax Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Central Excise Act - Sections 35C(2A); Income Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3617; (2009)225CTR(Bom)140; [2009]317ITR66(Bom); [2009]184TAXMAN400(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance,

Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Education

(i) Section 201 provides for consequences of failure to deduct tax. The said Section 201 was amended by Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 01/06/2002 wherein the proceedings were to be initiated within reasonable period of time. Subsequently … between the date of the accident and the date of the constitution of the Tribunal is not correct. Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of Section l10A of the Act are

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … Notes dated 19.07.2008 for the previous year ending on 31.03.2008 and for the period from 01.04.2008 to June, 2008, sought Service Tax from the Plaintiff, at the rate of 12.36%. They informed the Plaintiff that renting of … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil … Companies Act, 1956 had filed a Suit for Recovery bearing No. CS 56966/2016 for recovery of Rs.5,53,077/- along with interest @ 18% per annum, through

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Parties Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue and Others