Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … (AP)) 46Collector of C.E. Vs. Jay Engineering Works Ltd., (1989(39) E.L.T. 169(S.C.) 47. M/s. Annapurna Carbon Industries Co. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1976) 2

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … (reverse ejusdem generis) and it should be read non-statutorily while adopting purposive interpretation of the same. Reliance was 47 placed on Nabha Power Limited v. Punjab SPCL82 to state that a purposive interpretation of “cess”, is to

M/S India Cements Capital Limited Vs. William

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

of 2011 in Arbitration O.P.No.10 of 2008 before the District Court, Ernakulam on the ground that invocation of Section 47 of the Code by the court below was erroneous and opposed to law. According to the revision petitioner, … DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------- M/S INDIA CEMENTS CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA CEMENTS CAPITAL & FINANCE LTD.) HAVING ITS REGD.OFFICE ATDHAN BUILDING, 827, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI, REP.BY THEIR VICE PRESIDENT SHRI.G.RADHAKRISHNAN BY ADV. DR.GEORGE … of the revision petitioner under the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, "the Act") was sought to be enforced under the

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

and ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2008. 36 In view of paragraph no.30 above, upholding the validity of Section 65(105)(zzzz) and 65(90-a) of the Finance … and buildings generally fall also in the jurisdiction of the State. Reference is made to Entries 45, 46, 47 and 48 of the State List in which certain taxes are to be imposed on land and agricultural

Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. (Now Merged With Pepsico Ind Vs. Assistant Commi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Ericsson Ab Vs. Addl. Director of Income Tax, Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Pepsico India Holdings) Vs. Deputy Commissioner ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Aspect Software Inc Vs. Astt. Director of International Taxation and O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal

Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) and, particularly, to the amendment introduced therein by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 01.08.2008, which added the words - ‘even if the delay in disposing of the appeal