Advanced Search Results

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the … Conditions of Contract and other terms of the contract. On 1st April, 2008, the respondent denied admissibility of reimbursement of service tax and contended that … 1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

vires the Constitution of India. The impugned provision which was brought on to the statute book by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from (w.r.e.f.) 01.04.1989, has resulted in a grievance in so far as the petitioners/assessees are … he was required to furnish by notice given under Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (2) of Section 22 or Section 34 or has without reasonable cause failed to furnish it within the time allowed and in the manner required

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245A, 245(2A), 245C, 245C(1), 245C(3), 245D, 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(2A), 245D(2B), 245D(2C), 245D(2D), 245D(4), 245D(4A), 245D(4A)(1), 45D(4A)(2A), 45D(4A)(2D), 245D(4A)(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245HA, 245HA(3), 245(I), 245(4), 246C, 245HA(1), 245HA(2), 245HA(3) and 254(2A); Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008 - Sections 273AA, 273AA(1), 273AA(3), 278AB, 278AB(1) and 278AB(3); Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 1975; Wealth-tax Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Central Excise Act - Sections 35C(2A); Income Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3617; (2009)225CTR(Bom)140; [2009]317ITR66(Bom); [2009]184TAXMAN400(Bom)

before the Settlement Commission, remained on the statute book despite the amendments introduced by the 2007 Act.(e) By Finance Act, 2008 Section 273AA was introduced conferring power on the Commissioner to grant immunity from penalty, if the Commissioner was satisfied … by the Finance Act, 2007.Prior Scheme(i) An application to the Settlement Commission was submitted in accordance with Form 34B in Appendix II to the Income-tax Rules.The Annexure to Form 34B required the applicant, inter alia, to state

Commissioner of Income Tax Central Vs. Anil Hastkala (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Raj)417; [2010]186TAXMAN365(Raj)

tried to convince that once orders of settlement commission are not legally sustainable as per amendment made under Finance Act, 2007 being enforced w.e.f. 01/06/07, proceedings stand abated in terms of Section 245-HA as a consequence whereof, matter … than 324 orders from various High courts in the month of March, 2008, directing the Principal Bench to complete the cases by 31/03/2008.4. This would … Act, 1975 w.e.f. April 1, 1976. A somewhat similar provision was contained in Sub-sections (1A) to (1D) of Section 34 of Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 introduced in year 1954. However, provisions of Chapter XIX-A are qualitatively different

Chitra Construction Company Vs. Addl Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Valley, Green Home, Onampalayam, Coimbator”109. culminating in Mahazar dated 1.3.2012 as being ultra vires Section 82 of the Finance Act, apart from being in excess of jurisdiction and unconstitutional. W.P.No.22902 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 … relevant bearing to the formation of the belief and are not irrelevant or extraneous to the purpose of Section 34 of the Income Tax Act, 1922.73. In Chhugamal Rajpatl Vs. S.P.Chaliha and others, 1971 AIR 730.the Supreme Court … the consideration of not less than Rs.155 crores, during the period from 2008-09 upto the month of February 2012. Further, there is evidence to show

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

and ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2008. 36 In view of paragraph no.30 above, upholding the validity of Section 65(105)(zzzz) and 65(90-a) of the Finance … 4516 & 4517/2012, 12035/2010, 28895/2008, 8902/2013, 11095/2013, 5110/2011, 13880/2013, 8109/2009, 20170 & 20171/2010, 933 & 934/2011, 2318/2011, 32255/2012, 34221/2007, 34299/2007, 34751-34762/2007, 13272/2013 & 13656/2011, 26395/2011, 26012/2012, 8932/2011, 1644/2012 W.P.No.16400 of 2013: G.V.Matheswaran Petitioner versus 1 The Union

Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its register ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 378; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65A, 65A(2), 66, 68(1) and 83; Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(3), 129C and 129D; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR369; 2009(111)BomLR1529; (2009)224CTR(Bom)197; [2009]17STJ255; 2009[14]STR289; [2009]19STT408; (2009)22VST293(Bom)

done using mechanical systems.10. Entry (zzzzj) was inserted into Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994 by the Finance Act 2008 with effect from 16/5/08. The said entry reads as under:Section 65(105)(zzzzj) To any person, by any other person

Premlaxmi and Co. Vs. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

of the preliminary objection. The decision given by this Court (by D.K.Deshmukh,J., as he then was) in Garden Finance Ltd. Vs. Prakash Industries Ltd. [2001 (4) Mh.L.J. 425] has dealt with this facet in detail. I am … dated 3rd April 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the agreement between the parties by invoking Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “Arbitration Act”). 3 Admittedly, there is no specific clause

Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Education

(i) Section 201 provides for consequences of failure to deduct tax. The said Section 201 was amended by Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 01/06/2002 wherein the proceedings were to be initiated within reasonable period of time. Subsequently … Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering the provisions of Sections 37 of 1922 Act. It is submitted that unamended Section 34(1)(iii) provided for a period of one year in respect of an agent. It is submitted that by the