Advanced Search Results

Yfc Projects P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers made in YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd. are as under:“A) Issue a writ of certiorari/mandamus or … involved in works/composite contracts and it is levied @ 2%, enhanced to 4% with effect from 1st March, 2008. The said levy is not applicable to services covered under Section 65(105)(zzq) and (zzzh). (ix) There is a

Vistar Constructions (P) Ltd Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers made in YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd. are as under:“A) Issue a writ of certiorari/mandamus or … involved in works/composite contracts and it is levied @ 2%, enhanced to 4% with effect from 1st March, 2008. The said levy is not applicable to services covered under Section 65(105)(zzq) and (zzzh). (ix) There is a

Skyline Engineering Contracts (India)(P) Ltd Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers made in YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd. are as under:“A) Issue a writ of certiorari/mandamus or … involved in works/composite contracts and it is levied @ 2%, enhanced to 4% with effect from 1st March, 2008. The said levy is not applicable to services covered under Section 65(105)(zzq) and (zzzh). (ix) There is a

G.D.Buildtech P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers made in YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd. are as under:“A) Issue a writ of certiorari/mandamus or … involved in works/composite contracts and it is levied @ 2%, enhanced to 4% with effect from 1st March, 2008. The said levy is not applicable to services covered under Section 65(105)(zzq) and (zzzh). (ix) There is a

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. MartIn Lottery Agencies Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 9(1), 65, 65(19), 65(50), 65(105), 66, 68 and 271; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 65 and 65A; Finance Act, 2008; Finance Act, 1983; Lottery (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 4; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2 and 2(7); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Income-tax Act - Sections 22; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 162, 245 and 246, 268A and 298

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(SC)321; JT2009(11)SC151; 2009(7)SCALE341(1); (2009)12SCC209; [2009]17STJ237(SC); 2009[14]STR593; [2009]20STT203; 2009(6)LC2739(SC); (2009)24VST1(SC); 2009AIRSCW5301; [2009] 7 SCR 946

under the contract of sale.9. After the Special Leave Petition was filed in this Court, the Parliament by Finance Act, 2008 inserted an explanation in Sub-clause (ii) of Section 65(19), which came into force on or about 16.5.2008 and … 279. Therein the connotation of the word 'franchise' was noticed from California v. Central Pacific R. Co. (1888) 32 Law Ed 150 in the following terms:What is a franchise? Under the English Law, Blackstone defines it as

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … Notes dated 19.07.2008 for the previous year ending on 31.03.2008 and for the period from 01.04.2008 to June, 2008, sought Service Tax from the Plaintiff, at the rate of 12.36%. They informed the Plaintiff that renting of … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil … Reserved on: 23rd March, 2026 Pronounced on: 21st May, 2026 + RFA 32/2023 & CM APPL. 1770/2023 1. TANNIA RIKHY W/o Late Dr. Aneil Dilip

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

such cases: para 260. It was not open to the Revenue to rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to … FA 2007") to exclude DMG mistake claims, as these provisions purported to curtail the extended limitation period under section 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 without notice and without providing any transitional arrangements to protect the right under

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … (2011(23) L.T.R. 341(A.P.)); (d) Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. CCE, (2010(250) ELT 326 (Kar); (e) CCE New Delhi Vs. Hindustan Sanitary-ware and Industries Ltd. (2002(145)

Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its register ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 378; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65A, 65A(2), 66, 68(1) and 83; Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(3), 129C and 129D; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR369; 2009(111)BomLR1529; (2009)224CTR(Bom)197; [2009]17STJ255; 2009[14]STR289; [2009]19STT408; (2009)22VST293(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its registered office through Its Deputy Secretary and Mr. Badrinath Durvasula having his place of business Vs. Union of India (UOi) through Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Ministry of Finance Govt. of India and Ors. (23.03.2009 - BOMHC)

Delhi International Airport P. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

inter-alia seek the relief of declaration that the provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the said Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2007 are ultra-vires Entry 18 Entry 45 and Entry 49 of List-II … for R-1 & 2 Mr Anil Kathwaria for R-4 ===================================================================== WP(C) 2516/2008 & WP(C) 2707/2008 Page 1 of 32 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 These petitions