Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 section 28 · Page 1 of about 4,862 results (0.136 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 24 2009

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-2009

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

vires the Constitution of India. The impugned provision which was brought on to the statute book by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from (w.r.e.f.) 01.04.1989, has resulted in a grievance in so far as the petitioners/assessees are … Act.7.1 Section 271 of the Act corresponds to the provisions contained in Sub-sections (1), (2) and (6) of Section 28 of the Income Tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the =1922 Act). The relevant provision of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2008

Commissioner of Income-tax-v and Etc. Etc. Vs. Rampur Engineering Co. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-27-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271, 271(1) and 271(1B); Finance Act, 2008; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 28

Reported in : (2008)221CTR(Del)32; [2009]309ITR143(Delhi); [2009]176TAXMAN211(Delhi)

Matched in: Citation (2008)221CTR(Del)32; [2009]309ITR143(Delhi); [2009]176TAXMAN211(Delhi)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2009

Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its register ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 378; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65A, 65A(2), 66, 68(1) and 83; Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(3), 129C and 129D; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR369; 2009(111)BomLR1529; (2009)224CTR(Bom)197; [2009]17STJ255; 2009[14]STR289; [2009]19STT408; (2009)22VST293(Bom)

done using mechanical systems.10. Entry (zzzzj) was inserted into Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994 by the Finance Act 2008 with effect from 16/5/08. The said entry reads as under:Section 65(105)(zzzzj) To any person, by any other person … person in relation to mining of mineral, oil or gas8. By Circular No. 334/1/2007-TRU (Letter D.O.F. No.) dated 28/2/07 respondent 1 clarified that the different entries relating to mining activities were being consolidated under the said entry.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 14 2013

Videocon Industries Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Kumar Kedia

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Feb-14-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

addition to the judgment of the Supreme Court, the learned Counsel also placed reliance in case of R.S.D.V. Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Vallabh Glass Works Ltd. (AIR 1993 SC 2094) in support of his contention … of the plaintiff and he has filed Special Civil Suit No.94 of 2008 in the Court of 3rd Joint C.J.S.D., Aurangabad for recovery of an … Courts having such jurisdiction alone shall try dispute is not contrary to public policy and does not contravene Section 28 of the Contract Act. He also placed reliance upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in case of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata-iii Vs. Alom Extrusions Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-25-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 28, 36(1), 43B and 139(1); Finance Act, 2003; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1989; Provident Fund Act; Finance Act, 1983

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(SC)417; [2009]319ITR306(SC); JT2009(14)SC441; 2009(14)SCALE163; (2010)1SCC489; [2009]185TAXMAN416(SC)

whether omission [deletion] of the second proviso to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2003, operated with effect from 1st April, 2004, or whether it operated retrospectively with effect from 1st April, … Section 43B [main section] made it mandatory for the Department to grant deduction in computing the income under Section 28 in the year in which tax, duty, cess, etc., is actually paid. However, Parliament took cognizance of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2026

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … Notes dated 19.07.2008 for the previous year ending on 31.03.2008 and for the period from 01.04.2008 to June, 2008, sought Service Tax from the Plaintiff, at the rate of 12.36%. They informed the Plaintiff that renting of … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil … the Plaintiff Company that it had entered into a Lease Deed dated 28.08.2006 with the Defendants, in respect of Property bearing 2nd Floor, SMR House,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2021

The Commercial Tax Officer (Works Contract) vs Raju Joseph

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-29-2021

rates by a few specified classes of dealers registered under the KVAT Act, 2003. The State Legislature through Finance Act, 2008 in Section 5 thereof, introduced a few amendments to KVAT Act 2003 and Sub- section (4) deals with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2021

Agi Abraham vs Commercial Tax Officer (Works Contract and Luxury Tax)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-29-2021

rates by a few specified classes of dealers registered under the KVAT Act, 2003. The State Legislature through Finance Act, 2008 in Section 5 thereof, introduced a few amendments to KVAT Act 2003 and Sub- section (4) deals with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2021

M/S. Biju Augustine vs Commercial Tax Officer (Wc)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-29-2021

rates by a few specified classes of dealers registered under the KVAT Act, 2003. The State Legislature through Finance Act, 2008 in Section 5 thereof, introduced a few amendments to KVAT Act 2003 and Sub- section (4) deals with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2021

M/S.Cheerans Structurals Engineers & Contractors vs the Commercial ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-29-2021

rates by a few specified classes of dealers registered under the KVAT Act, 2003. The State Legislature through Finance Act, 2008 in Section 5 thereof, introduced a few amendments to KVAT Act 2003 and Sub- section (4) deals with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial