Advanced Search Results

Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its register ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 378; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65A, 65A(2), 66, 68(1) and 83; Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(3), 129C and 129D; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR369; 2009(111)BomLR1529; (2009)224CTR(Bom)197; [2009]17STJ255; 2009[14]STR289; [2009]19STT408; (2009)22VST293(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its registered office through Its Deputy Secretary and Mr. Badrinath Durvasula having his place of business Vs. Union of India (UOi) through Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Ministry of Finance Govt. of India and Ors. (23.03.2009 - BOMHC)

India Trade Promotion Organization Vs. Director General of Income Tax ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‗the said Act‘) as amended by the Finance Act, 2008, on the ground that it is arbitrary and unreasonable and has no rational nexus with the object sought … rates. Furthermore, it was pointed out that, although the intent behind establishing the petitioner as a company under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 was to apply its surplus in furtherance of its objectives, the surplus generated

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … 3. The genesis of the issue is a show cause notice dated 25.4.2006 issued by the revenue to the appellant, inter alia, recording that the

State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

and six telecom related services were omitted and merged into one new category of taxable service. Further, the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 16-5-2008, introduced 6 new services. Further, the Finance (No.2) Act, 2009 w.e.f. 1-9-2009 introduced 3 new services. … clubs in corporate form. According to him, it makes no difference that the company is one registered under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 (“hereinafter referred to as the “Companies Act”), as is the case in the

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Parties Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue and Others

m/s.karnataka Power Transmission Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

to be read along with Section 201 of the Act. The provisions of Section 200 prior to the Finance Act, 2008 mandated that the amount of tax deducted should be paid to the credit of the Central Government within … in the interest of justice and equity 2 These Appeals having been heard and reserved for orders on 25th January 2016, coming on for pronouncement of Judgment this day, S. Sujatha J., made the following. JUDGMENT These

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Commissioner Service Tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

₹7,19,01,91 0 t - (three SCNs) which they have not paid during the period May, 2006 to March, 2008, should not be recovered under Section 75 of the Finance Act. 1994; (iii) Penalty should not be imposed … not be demanded and recovered under the proviso to the Section 73(1) read with Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and education cess under Section 95 of Finance Act … Corporation (DTC), a Central public sector undertaking, to assail the order dated 25.04.2014 passed by the principal bench of Custom Excise and Service Tax Appellate

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai Vs. M/S. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. T ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be understood before correctly appreciating the nature and purport of Rule 8D. Section 14A was first inserted by Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect w.e.f. 01.04.1962. Section 14A as originally inserted reads as under:­ “14A. Expenditure incurred in … can in no manner be retrospective. He submits that Rule 8D was made applicable by Fifth Amendment Rules, 2008 providing in Clause 2 i.e. “they shall come into force from the date of their 7 publication in … @ SLP(C) No. 17499 of 2017, C.A.No.1446 of 2018 @ SLP(C) No. 25337 of 2017, C.A.No.1460 of 2018 @ SLP(C)No. 3447of 2018 (Diary No. 19735

K. Arumugam Etc. Etc. Vs. Union Of India And Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

dismissed the appellant’s writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Explanation to Section 65(19)(ii) introduced by the Finance Act, 2008 with effect from 16.05.2008. The appellant in this case was appointed as the exclusive statutory marketing agent by … by the assessees against the judgments of the High Courts of Sikkim and Kerala dated Page 1 of 2503.07.2010 and 19.08.2011 respectively.3. In K. Arumugam vs. Union of India, C.A. No.2842-2848 of 2012, the facts are that