Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 section 166 · Page 1 of about 503 results (0.109 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 13 2015

Nepal Singh Vs. Upender Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-13-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the offending vehicle and came to know that the offending vehicle was registered in the name of a finance company namely Parivar Finance and Investment India Ltd., 30 Rani Jhansi Road, New Delhi. Details of the lessee … prosecution. Further the judgment by the Supreme Court delivered on August 07, 2008 was suppressed from the Executing Court. 8. On behalf of respondent, Sh.K.S.Rana, … not affect the case of respondent to seek compensation from him. In a petition to seek compensation under Section 166 M.V.Act, to prove the negligence, the standard of proof required to hold a person liable to pay compensation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2017

Shelly Khetrapal & Ors. Vs.mohd.hanif & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

responsible for the use of the vehicle or damage caused in its wake. She placed reliance on Godavari Finance Company vs. Degala Satyanarayanamma & Ors., (2008) 5 SCC107 and a decision of the Full Bench of this … be registered) in his name. The claimants, who were successful in establishing their respective cases for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the tribunal have felt aggrieved for the reason that the registered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2017

Nupur Khetrapal vs.mohd.hanif & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

responsible for the use of the vehicle or damage caused in its wake. She placed reliance on Godavari Finance Company vs. Degala Satyanarayanamma & Ors., (2008) 5 SCC107 and a decision of the Full Bench of this … be registered) in his name. The claimants, who were successful in establishing their respective cases for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the tribunal have felt aggrieved for the reason that the registered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 2017

Sidharth Khetrapal vs.mohd.hanif & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

responsible for the use of the vehicle or damage caused in its wake. She placed reliance on Godavari Finance Company vs. Degala Satyanarayanamma & Ors., (2008) 5 SCC107 and a decision of the Full Bench of this … be registered) in his name. The claimants, who were successful in establishing their respective cases for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the tribunal have felt aggrieved for the reason that the registered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2017

Shelly Khetrapal vs.mohd.hanif & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

responsible for the use of the vehicle or damage caused in its wake. She placed reliance on Godavari Finance Company vs. Degala Satyanarayanamma & Ors., (2008) 5 SCC107 and a decision of the Full Bench of this … be registered) in his name. The claimants, who were successful in establishing their respective cases for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the tribunal have felt aggrieved for the reason that the registered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2016

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others Vs. Delhi Development Authority ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

from a previous date and that the use of the said words in Section 16 of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2008 did not confer the jurisdiction on the State Government to issue a notification in respect of the rate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2012

Malad Kokil Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another Vs. the Mode ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Reserve Bank of India v/s. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and ors. {AIR 1987 SCC 1023}, the Court will have to draw a distinction … 791; White Towers Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. vs. S.K. Builders and Ors. 2008 (6) Bom. C.R. 371; BajranglalEriwal v. Sagarmal Chunilal, 2008 (6) Bom.C.R. 887; … Chandru Tahilram Tolani and ors., 2006 (6) MHLJ 166; JayantilalInvestments v/s. Madhuvihar Co-op. Hsg. Society and ors. … It is the contention of the plaintiff-society that after they pursued the matter under the Right to Information Act, they came to know about the Commencement Certificate granted in favour of the defendants by the Corporation on … in the property within the period mentioned in the agreement executed under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

Tomy Joseph vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 166 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 712/2017 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2023

Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural And Rural Development Bank Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-14-2023

Subject : Direct Taxation

or more of such activities which are mentioned in sub-section (2). Sub-section (4) of Section 80P43inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 is in the nature of a proviso and such a deduction under the said Section shall not … also been defined to lend clarity to them.41. A clarification by the CBDT, in a letter dated 9-5- 2008, is also important, and states as follows: “Subject.-Clarification regarding admissibility of deduction under Section 80-P of the Income

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

The State of Kerala, vs K.Junais Babu

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 166 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 712/2017 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial