Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 section 15 · Page 1 of about 5,314 results (0.093 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 16 2009

infoparks Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-16-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 9, 10, 11, 12A, 197 and 197(1); Travancore Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955; Finance Act, 2008 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(Ker)486; [2010]186TAXMAN328(Ker)

medical relief and the advancement of any other object of general public utility.As per Section 2 of the Finance Act, 2008, the said provision was amended adding a 'proviso' w.e.f. 1st April, 2009 as follows :Provided that the advancement … 186 (SC), CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation : (1986) 52 CTR (SC) 75 : (1986) 159 ITR 1 (SC), Victoria Technical Institute v. Addl. CIT and Anr. : (1991) 94 CTR (SC) 153 :

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2008

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Shanti Parshad JaIn and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-08-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)246

Revenue to challenge its correctness in the case of other assessees, without just cause. No doubt, by the Finance Act, 2008, Section 268A has been inserted with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999 as under:268A. Filing of appeal or application … Jain, CWT(A) has upheld the action of the IAC, while relying on a circular of the Board dt. 15th Nov., 1973. However, in the case of Shri D.P. Jain, the CWT(A) adopted the value at 20 per

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2009

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-2009

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

vires the Constitution of India. The impugned provision which was brought on to the statute book by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from (w.r.e.f.) 01.04.1989, has resulted in a grievance in so far as the petitioners/assessees are … Rajiv Shakdher, J1. The captioned writ petitions lay challenge to the provisions of Section 271(1B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the =Act) on the ground that it … further in appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal by an order dated 15.07.2005 deleted the penalty imposed on the petitioner. In doing so it posed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 2010

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. Mumbai. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-12-2010

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 14A(1)(2)(3); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 8; Finance Act of 2001 - Section 14A; Finance Act 1997 - Section 10(33)

form part of the total income under the Act. Section 14A was introduced by an amendment to the Finance Act of 2001 with retrospective effect from 1 April 1962. Subsections (2) and (3) were inserted by the Finance … satisfied with the claim of the assessee. Rule 8D was notified in the Official Gazette of 24 March 2008. By Section 10(33) as it stood during Assessment Year 200203 income by way of dividend referred to in … now widened under Section 14A. Reading Section 14 in juxtaposition with Sections 15 to 59, it is clear that the words "expenditure incurred" in Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2026

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … Notes dated 19.07.2008 for the previous year ending on 31.03.2008 and for the period from 01.04.2008 to June, 2008, sought Service Tax from the Plaintiff, at the rate of 12.36%. They informed the Plaintiff that renting of … T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.Signature Not Verified RFA 32/2023 Page 1 of 15 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2023

K.l. Swamy Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-13-2023

Subject : Direct Taxation

the words “that Assessing Officer shall proceed” the words “under Section 158BC” was inserted w.e.f. 01.06.2002 by the Finance Act, 2002. It was contended that the amendment was specifically brought to cure the anomaly and the fact that … judgment and order.2. In all these appeals, the dispute is with respect to levy of interest under Section 158BFA(1) of the Income Tax Act in respect of assessment completed under Section 158BD of the Act for belatedly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

Matched in: Citation (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2013

R (on the Application of Prudential Plc and Another) Vs. Special Commi ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-23-2013

Subject : Right to Information

of TMA have now been replaced by provisions contained in section 113 of, and Schedule 36 to, the Finance Act 2008 ("the 2008 Act"). While there are differences between the regime in TMA and that in the 2008 Act, … 20 by virtue of LAP, in accordance with the decision of the House of Lords in Morgan Grenfell. 15. That application came before Charles J, who rejected it on the ground that, although the disputed documents would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial