Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … Escorts Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi, reported in 2004(171) ELT 145 (SC). Since the question raised in this application is covered by the

M/S Josco Bullion Traders Pvt Ltd, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a

P.a.Jose, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a

Josgold vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a

M/S Josco Bullion Traders Pvt Ltd, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a

P.a.Jose, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a

P.P.Alphonsa, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a

Josco Bullion Traders Pvt. Ltd., vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a

Josco Jewellers Pvt. Ltd, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a

P.P.Alphonsa, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

of Chartered Accountants. 4.2 Section 145 of the Income Tax Act (for short, ‘theAct’) was amended by the Finance Act 1995 with effect from 01.04.1997, which was intended to restrict the options available to an assessee following a