Advanced Search Results

M. Palanisamy Vs. K. Karvannan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

his liability. But the trial Court held that the respondent has issued 25 cheques to one Lakshmi Saraswathi Finance Company, since he is availing vehicle loan and repaying the same in monthly installment. As soon as he … and another, 2007 Cri.L.J. 2643 2. Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatraya G.Hedge, 2008 4 SCC 54. … the return memos were marked as Exs.P2 and P3. Hence, the appellant issued a statutory notice Ex.P4 under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act on 18.02.2003. The postal receipt was marked as Ex.P5. The respondent received the same

Amarnath Baijnath Gupta and anr. Vs. Mohini Organics Pvt. Ltd. and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141, 141(1), 142 and 145; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 200, 397 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR258; 2009CriLJ995

also relied upon a decision of this Court in the case of Kapal Mehra v. Indusind Enterprises and Finance Ltd. : 2008(2)BomCR359 and submitted that the persons sought to be made criminally liable under Section 141 must … first respondent filed a private complaint against the petitioners and four others alleging commission of an offence under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'). The

Jyoti W/O Rajkumar Sahajwani Vs. Shri Sadhu S/O Safarmal Manjani and A ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

(2) Mh.L.J. 1003 (Mamatadevi Prafullakumar Bhansali...Versus...Pushpadevi Kailashkumar Agrawal and another). (b) AIR 2009 Supreme Court 422 (M/s. Shankar Finance and Investments ...Versus... State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.). 35. In the case of MamatadeviPrafullakumar Bhansali...Versus...Pushpadevi Kailashkumar Agrawal … Act fails. On the similar issue, reference was made to another citation 2008 (2) Mh.L.J. 771 (K. Prakashan...Versus...P.K. Surenderan). 29. While dealing with this issue … by the present appellant was dismissed and present respondent no.1/original accused was acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 4. In order to appreciate the rival submissions in the present appeal and

M/S. Enpee Earthmovers and Others Vs. M/S.Resources International and ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the interest has been calculated on amount of provisional bills and not final bills. Relying upon “Karekar Finance Pvt. Ltd. V/s Shri M. N. Bashyam and anr.” [2007(2) Goa L.R. 465], the learned Counsel contended that … impugned in the present appeals, the Complaints filed by the appellant against the accused for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. (N.I. Act, for short) were all dismissed. 3. The parties shall hereinafter

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vijay Kumar Goel

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2010]324ITR376(NULL)

Section 40A deals with expenses or payments not deductible in certain circumstances.9. Sub-section (3) as amended by the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from April 1, 2009 reads as under:Where the assessee incurs any expenditure in respect of which

Mr. Rajesh Bhalchandra Chalke Vs. M/S Emco Dynatorq Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act (NI) - Section 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 482, 252 ; Companies Act - Section 293; Constitution of India - Article 227; Amending Act - Sections 143 to 147

decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in Peacock Industries Ltd. and others vs M/s Budhrani Finance Ltd. and another, 2006 ALL MR CRI 2233, decided on 14th July 2006. Referring to the various guidelines … by the complainant to accused No.1 company by cheque dated 19th September 2008; that upon receipt of payment accused No.2 had sent certified copy of … by Act No.55 of 2002), a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate, First Class, taking up a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act, along with documents in support thereof and a verification made in the affidavit in

M/S.Eicher Motors Ltd. vs C.Y.Salim

Court : Kerala

accused was that he had purchased a truck bearing registration No.KL-17/B- 6161 by availing a loan from Sundaram Finance. Theloan was arranged by the complainant. He also purchased another truck bearing registration No.KL- 17/B-1414 by availing a … Magistrate, after analysing thematerials placed on record, found the accused guilty and convicted him for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and directed him to remit a fine of Rs.19,500/- in all the four cases … directed against the commonjudgment in Crl.A Nos.977, 978, 979 and 980 of 2008of the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc- I), Ernakulam, (Appellate Court),

M/S.Eicher Motors Ltd vs C.Y.Salim and Another

Court : Kerala

accused was that he had purchased a truck bearing registration No.KL-17/B- 6161 by availing a loan from Sundaram Finance. Theloan was arranged by the complainant. He also purchased another truck bearing registration No.KL- 17/B-1414 by availing a … Magistrate, after analysing thematerials placed on record, found the accused guilty and convicted him for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and directed him to remit a fine of Rs.19,500/- in all the four cases … directed against the commonjudgment in Crl.A Nos.977, 978, 979 and 980 of 2008of the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc- I), Ernakulam, (Appellate Court),

M/S.Eicher Motors Ltd. vs C.Y.Salim & Anr.

Court : Kerala

accused was that he had purchased a truck bearing registration No.KL-17/B- 6161 by availing a loan from Sundaram Finance. Theloan was arranged by the complainant. He also purchased another truck bearing registration No.KL- 17/B-1414 by availing a … Magistrate, after analysing thematerials placed on record, found the accused guilty and convicted him for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and directed him to remit a fine of Rs.19,500/- in all the four cases … directed against the commonjudgment in Crl.A Nos.977, 978, 979 and 980 of 2008of the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc- I), Ernakulam, (Appellate Court),

P. Mohanraj Vs. M/s. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with experts in finance. The expression “financial sector regulator” is defined by Section 3(18) as follows: … who was a “designated partner” as defined in clause (j) of Section 2 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 of 2009), or an “officer who is in default”, as defined in clause (60) of Section 2 … reason “funds insufficient” on 03.03.2017. As a result, on 31.03.2017, the respondent issued a statutory demand notice under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, calling upon the company and its three Directors,