Advanced Search Results
Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.
Uttaranchal
Jul-26-2010
Company
Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We
services. Section 66(5) is being reproduced hereunder:66. Charge of service tax.-(5) With effect from the date notified under Section 137 of the Finance Act, 2001, there shall be levied a service tax at the rate of five per … the fact, that broadcasting was subjected to tax liability as a 'service' for the first time under the Finance Act, 2001. Chapter V. of the Finance Act, 2001 bears the heading 'Service Tax'. Section 65(13) of the Finance … No. 2562 of 2007, and thereafter, Writ Petition (M/S) No. 353 of 2008.7. The principal contention on behalf the petitioner, while assailing the action of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras Hire Purchase Association Represented by Mr. NitIn Sagan Vs. Un ...
Chennai
Jun-09-2009
Sales Tax/VATConstitution
Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(12), 65(14), 65(105) and 66; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Constitution of India (Eighty-eighth) (Amendment) Act, 2003; Constitution of India (Forty-sixth) (Amendment) Act; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 137; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 246, 246(1), 265, 268A and 366(29A)
(2009)225CTR(Mad)289; (2009)5MLJ1137; [2009]18STJ235(Madras); 2009[16]STR3; (2009)25VST446(Mad)
collected in such manner as may be prescribed.(2) .....(3) .....(4) ......(5) With effect from the date notified under Section 137 of the Finance Act, 2001, there shall be levied a service tax at the rate of five per … 268-A are introduced giving authority to the parliament to legislate on service tax; that Section 65(12) of the Finance Act, 1994 defines 'Banking and other financial services' as 'financial leasing services including equipment leasing and hire-purchases'. The learned … nature test.iii) Imagic Creative (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Commercial Tax : 2008[9]S.T.R.337 wherein in Para Nos. 28, 32 and 34, it was held thus:28.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskO.A. Antony and Others Vs. Chandni Chits Pvt. Ltd (In Liquidation) Rep ...
Kerala
Dec-23-2015
Company
Faridabad Cold Storages case (supra), a learned Judge of the Delhi High Court in Official Liquidator of Liberty Finance Pvt. Ltd (in liquidation) v. Radha Mohan and others (1979 (49) CC 287) held that, the expression 'any … are reckoned along with the normal period of limitation prescribed under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 the claims are not barred by limitation. … 4.4.1990 in C.P.No.57/1989 of the learned Company Judge M/s.Chandini Chits Private Ltd., a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was ordered to be wound up and the Official Liquidator attached … claims before the Company Court under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 446 of the Act. 3. The appellants in these appeals, who were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Amazon.com Nv Investment Holdings Llc Vs. Future Retail Limited
Supreme Court of India
Aug-06-2021
Arbitration
shareholders of FRL (vi) Respondents No.12 and 13 - Future Corporate Resources Pvt. Ltd. and Akar Estate and Finance Pvt. Ltd., group companies of FRL2Respondents No.1 to 13 are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Biyani Group”. … Centre [“SIAC Rules”]. can be said to be an order under Section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Arbitration Act”].; and second, as to whether an order passed under Section 17(2) of the Arbitration Act … Jet Airways (India) Ltd. v. Subrata Roy Sahara, 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1379 :2012. (2) AIR Bom 855 [“Jet Airways”]., stating that they applied only
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKuruvila Thomas vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-29-2022
the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt.Sheeba Joseph vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-29-2022
the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Aswathywud vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-29-2022
the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Thottathil Traders vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-29-2022
the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Thottathil Traders vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-29-2022
the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala vs K.M. Chakrapani
Kerala
Jul-29-2022
the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »