Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 section 137 · Page 1 of about 573 results (0.123 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 26 2010

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-26-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

services. Section 66(5) is being reproduced hereunder:66. Charge of service tax.-(5) With effect from the date notified under Section 137 of the Finance Act, 2001, there shall be levied a service tax at the rate of five per … the fact, that broadcasting was subjected to tax liability as a 'service' for the first time under the Finance Act, 2001. Chapter V. of the Finance Act, 2001 bears the heading 'Service Tax'. Section 65(13) of the Finance … No. 2562 of 2007, and thereafter, Writ Petition (M/S) No. 353 of 2008.7. The principal contention on behalf the petitioner, while assailing the action of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2009

Madras Hire Purchase Association Represented by Mr. NitIn Sagan Vs. Un ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VATConstitution

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(12), 65(14), 65(105) and 66; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Constitution of India (Eighty-eighth) (Amendment) Act, 2003; Constitution of India (Forty-sixth) (Amendment) Act; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 137; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 246, 246(1), 265, 268A and 366(29A)

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Mad)289; (2009)5MLJ1137; [2009]18STJ235(Madras); 2009[16]STR3; (2009)25VST446(Mad)

collected in such manner as may be prescribed.(2) .....(3) .....(4) ......(5) With effect from the date notified under Section 137 of the Finance Act, 2001, there shall be levied a service tax at the rate of five per … 268-A are introduced giving authority to the parliament to legislate on service tax; that Section 65(12) of the Finance Act, 1994 defines 'Banking and other financial services' as 'financial leasing services including equipment leasing and hire-purchases'. The learned … nature test.iii) Imagic Creative (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Commercial Tax : 2008[9]S.T.R.337 wherein in Para Nos. 28, 32 and 34, it was held thus:28.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2015

O.A. Antony and Others Vs. Chandni Chits Pvt. Ltd (In Liquidation) Rep ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-23-2015

Subject : Company

Faridabad Cold Storages case (supra), a learned Judge of the Delhi High Court in Official Liquidator of Liberty Finance Pvt. Ltd (in liquidation) v. Radha Mohan and others (1979 (49) CC 287) held that, the expression 'any … are reckoned along with the normal period of limitation prescribed under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 the claims are not barred by limitation. … 4.4.1990 in C.P.No.57/1989 of the learned Company Judge M/s.Chandini Chits Private Ltd., a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was ordered to be wound up and the Official Liquidator attached … claims before the Company Court under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 446 of the Act. 3. The appellants in these appeals, who were

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 06 2021

Amazon.com Nv Investment Holdings Llc Vs. Future Retail Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-06-2021

Subject : Arbitration

shareholders of FRL (vi) Respondents No.12 and 13 - Future Corporate Resources Pvt. Ltd. and Akar Estate and Finance Pvt. Ltd., group companies of FRL2Respondents No.1 to 13 are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Biyani Group”. … Centre [“SIAC Rules”]. can be said to be an order under Section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Arbitration Act”].; and second, as to whether an order passed under Section 17(2) of the Arbitration Act … Jet Airways (India) Ltd. v. Subrata Roy Sahara, 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1379 :2012. (2) AIR Bom 855 [“Jet Airways”]., stating that they applied only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

Kuruvila Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

Smt.Sheeba Joseph vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

M/S. Aswathywud vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

M/S.Thottathil Traders vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

M/S.Thottathil Traders vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

State of Kerala vs K.M. Chakrapani

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 137 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TAVAT 133/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial