Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … bodies - ERNET, NIXI and GS1 India ................................................................... 116 (v) State Cricket Associations.............................................................................................................. 122 (vi) Private trusts ................................................................................................................................... 135 IV. Summation of conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 141 A. General test under Section 2(15) ............................................................................................................ 141 B. Authorities, corporations, or

Chitra Construction Company Vs. Addl Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Valley, Green Home, Onampalayam, Coimbator”109. culminating in Mahazar dated 1.3.2012 as being ultra vires Section 82 of the Finance Act, apart from being in excess of jurisdiction and unconstitutional. W.P.No.22902 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 … steps for confiscation of contraband and levy of penalty. As such, the evidence is admissible for prosecution, under Section 135 of the said Act.114. In P.K.Ghosh Vs. Kailash Kumar Mazodia, 2000 (117) E.L.T. 14 (Cal.), the Calcutta High … the consideration of not less than Rs.155 crores, during the period from 2008-09 upto the month of February 2012. Further, there is evidence to show

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was

KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Another Vs. Anil Agarwal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

internationally well-known trade mark with a presence in India (KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Limited; Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 in Suit No.2930 of 2007; decided on 11th February 2008). … Limited and Anr. v Kalpataru Hospitality and Facility Management, 2011 (48) PTC 135 (Bom.). The law is well-settled and there can be no quarrel with … KG v John Distilleries Ltd., 2011 (47) PTC 100 (Bom)). If he does not do so and an action is brought against him subsequently in infringement, he cannot claim innocence. 13. It seems that the Defendant's application … be an unregistered proprietor or user at least for the purposes of Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 using dissimilar goods and, therefore,

M/S Heliocon Agro Chemicals Limited vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

on the ground that the appeals were not filed within the time prescribed under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. The respondent No.2 has relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

M/S.Thottathil Traders vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which … 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 124 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TA 135/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: ANNAMMA KURUVILA, AGED 53 YEARS PROPRIETRIX, TISHA

The State of Kerala, vs K.Junais Babu

Court : Kerala

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which … 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 124 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TA 135/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: ANNAMMA KURUVILA, AGED 53 YEARS PROPRIETRIX, TISHA

Memana Agencies, Cherthala vs the Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Kerala

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which … 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 124 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TA 135/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: ANNAMMA KURUVILA, AGED 53 YEARS PROPRIETRIX, TISHA

Annamma Kuruvila vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which … 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 124 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TA 135/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: ANNAMMA KURUVILA, AGED 53 YEARS PROPRIETRIX, TISHA

Kuruvila Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the Act unless the context otherwise requires. The Fifth proviso is a context otherwise spelt out by Kerala Finance Act 2008, effective from 01.04.2005. The Legislature, in its competence, wisdom and policy of providing measures to a few individuals … cases. 3.1 A full Bench vide order dated 06.04.2022 has laid down as follows:“9. Now, we will examine Section 2 of the Act, which begins with the words “In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”, which … 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 124 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER TA 135/2017 OF KVAT APPELLATE TRIBUNALREVISION PETITIONER/S: ANNAMMA KURUVILA, AGED 53 YEARS PROPRIETRIX, TISHA