Advanced Search Results
M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … West Bengal Vs. M/s.Phelps and Co.(P) Ltd., (1972) 4 Supreme Court Cases 121; (c) CC, Kolkata Vs. Rupa and Co. Ltd., (2004(170) E.L.T. 129 (S.C.))
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR (on the Application of Prudential Plc and Another) Vs. Special Commi ...
UK Supreme Court
Jan-23-2013
Right to Information
of TMA have now been replaced by provisions contained in section 113 of, and Schedule 36 to, the Finance Act 2008 ("the 2008 Act"). While there are differences between the regime in TMA and that in the 2008 Act, … explained in terms which I could not begin to improve on by Lord Sumption in paras 115 to 121 below. In modern times, LPP, and more particularly LAP, have been fully considered and refined in a number
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Truwood Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Vs. the Commissioner of Central ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-06-2012
Land Acquisition
parties that the said provisions were amended by substitution with effect from 01-06-2007 by Section 121 of the Finance Act, 2007 and the amended provisions do not apply to the facts of the case. 22004) 1 S.C.C. 287 … provisions do not apply to the facts of the case. 22004) 1 S.C.C. 287 C.E.A.Nos.54 and 56 of 2008 COMMON JUDGMENT (per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao): The appellants in both these appeals filed under Section 35-G
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rakesh Malhotra and Others Vs. Rajinder Kumar Malhotra and Others
Mumbai
Aug-21-2014
Arbitration
The decision of the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in O.P. Gupta v Shiv General Finance (P.) Ltd. and Ors.(1977) 47 Comp Cas 279 (Delhi)followed the previous decision in Surendra Kumar Dhawan, explicitly citing … Malhotra (with Rajiv and Mrs. Kunika Malhotra holding some small equity). In 2008, a restructuring was proposed. The Indian companies assets, businesses, and plants were … effect of achieving the desired result. ... [p. 121] Having regard to the above discussion, we are … brought before the Company Law Board invoking the provisions of Sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 at all referable to a private tribunal, viz., an arbitral panel for resolution? Does a decision of … a dispute brought before the Company Law Board invoking the provisions of Sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 at all referable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Teleservices Vs. Union of India
Gujarat
Feb-05-2016
Education
(i) Section 201 provides for consequences of failure to deduct tax. The said Section 201 was amended by Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 01/06/2002 wherein the proceedings were to be initiated within reasonable period of time. Subsequently … be an assessee in default in respect of such tax: Provided that no penalty shall be charged under section 121 from such person, unless the Assessing Officer is satisfied that such person, without good and sufficient reasons, has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnataka State Beverages Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Karnataka
Feb-18-2016
Direct Taxation
as Section 40(a)(iib) is concerned, the learned counsel would submit that the said sub-clause was inserted by the Finance Act, 2013 with effect from 1.4.2014 and the said section specifically disallows any amount paid by way of privilege … the Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Vatika Township (P.) Ltd. [2014] 367 ITR 466/227 Taxman 121/49 taxmann.com 249 (SC), would support the case of the petitioner that from a plain reading of the said
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Gs1 India Vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemption) and anr
Delhi
Sep-26-2013
Land Acquisition
reproduce Section 2(15) of the Act which defines the term ‗charitable purpose‘ before and after its amendment by Finance Act, 2008. Section 2(15) before amendment by Finance Act, 2008 was as under; ―2(15) ―charitable purpose‖ includes relief of the poor, … in view of the authoritative pronouncement of the Supreme Court in Additional CIT v. Surat Cloth Manufacturers Association,(1980) 121 ITR 1(SC). In the said decision, it was held that the primary or dominant purpose of the trust
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/s Pepsi Foods Ltd. (now Pepsic ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-06-2021
Education
heels of this judgment, Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act was again amended, this time by the Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01/10/2008). This amendment reads as follows: “254. Orders of Appellate Tribunal. xxx xxx xxx (2A) In every … Union of India [Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, (1985) 1 SCC641:1985. SCC (Tax) 121]. stated that it was settled law that subordinate legislation can be challenged on any of the grounds available
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.N. Swarna Prasad Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Range-2, ...
Karnataka
Dec-08-2014
Direct Taxation
account payee bank draft was not allowed of the deduction, when the law was amended on 1.4.2009 by Finance Act, 2008, when the word 'aggregate of payments' made to a person in a day was incerted. It means till … year 2005-2006 declaring total income at Rs. 11,27,447/-. The assessing authority disallowed a sum of Rs.3,08,296/- as contravening Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Further, he held … of CIT v. Vatika Township (P.) Ltd. [2014] 367 ITR 466/227 Taxman 121/49 taxmann.com 249 has held an amendment made to a taxing statute can
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Manipur and anr. Vs. Shri Thokchom Jadumani Singh
Guwahati
Jan-22-2009
Criminal
2009CriLJ3299
course of such inquiry material evidences have been collected that one Shri Moirangthem Balaram alias Suresh Bhaiya, S/S Finance Secretary of the banned organization namely People's Liberation Army (PLA) of Khangabok, Thoubal District is a close friend … Case No. 102 (4) 2008 Thoubal P. S. under Section 121/121-A, I.P.C. and 17, 20 UA (P) A Act, 2004 for an indefinite period. For easy reference, the impugned order dated 11-7-2008 is quoted hereunder:I have heard
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »