Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 section 12 · Page 1 of about 5,947 results (0.071 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 30 2012

intercontinental Consultants and Technorats Pvt. L Vs. U.O.i. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-30-2012

Subject : Service Tax

said rule is ultra vires of the provisions of Section 66 and 67 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994.2. The petitioner is a company providing consulting engineering services. It specialises in highways, structures, airports, urban and … the provision of sub-rule (i) of Rule 5 of the Service Tax (Determination of value) Rules, (Notification number 12/2006-ST, dated 19.04.2006) the service tax is liable to be charged on the gross value including reimbursable and out

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2012

Ms.Advait Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-27-2012

Subject : Custom

Acts : Finance Act, 2008 ; Customs Act, 1962 - Section 12, 76F, 2, 2(18), Clause 27; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 7, 26, 30, 2(c), 2(g), 3, 4, 51, 26(2); Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006 - Rule 27, 30; Constitution of India. - Articles 19(1)(g), 265, 269(2), 269(1)(g), 266, 245, 246, Entry 83 of List 1 of Schedule 7

was being levied, in respect of several iron and steel items, in accordance with the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008. However, vide Notification No.66/2008-Customs, dated 10.5.2008, the effective rate of duty, leviable on goods exported out of India, … only on goods exported out of India, in view of the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, especially, Section 12 of the said Act, such duties were being levied and collected even in respect of the supplies made

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2009

Canoro Resources Limited Vs. Director of Income-tax (internat Ional Ta ...

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Decided on : Apr-23-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

applicable to every firm is 30 per cent as per paragraph (c) of the First Schedule of the Finance Act, 2008. 10. 10.1 It is the common stand of both - the applicant and the Revenue, that the nature … Mr. A. Sinha M/s Canoro Resources Ltd. has filed this application under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The applicant is a foreign company, registered in Canada. 2. … in a number of cases. In B.R. Naik v/s CIT (13 ITR 124), a partnership firm registered in Salisbury, South Rhodesia carried on business there.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 24 2009

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-2009

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

vires the Constitution of India. The impugned provision which was brought on to the statute book by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from (w.r.e.f.) 01.04.1989, has resulted in a grievance in so far as the petitioners/assessees are … Supreme Court in Virender Singh Hooda v. State of Haryana : (2004) 12 SCC 588 at 605 para 33 & 34, Empire Industries Ltd. v. … Rajiv Shakdher, J1. The captioned writ petitions lay challenge to the provisions of Section 271(1B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the =Act) on the ground that it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 2013

Commissioner of Income Tax -xiii Vs. Rajinder Kumar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-01-2013

Subject : Direct Taxation

The assessee was asked to explain why disallowance should not be made under Section 40(a)(ia) as amended by Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 2005. The assessee filed written submissions that they had not claimed any … memorandum explaining the amendments to Section 40(a)(ia) reproduced in (2010) 321 ITR Statutes 79 reads:“Notes on Clauses: Clause 12 of the Bill seeks to amend section 40 of the Income-tax Act relating to amounts not deductible. Under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2016

Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-05-2016

Subject : Education

(i) Section 201 provides for consequences of failure to deduct tax. The said Section 201 was amended by Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 01/06/2002 wherein the proceedings were to be initiated within reasonable period of time. Subsequently … to declare the impugned Summons dated 9/12/2014, impugned Notices dated 18/12/2014 and impugned Letters dated 18/12/2014, 29/12/2014 and 12/1/2015 issued by the respondent No. 2 are barred by limitation and be pleased to strike down the same

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Oscar Laboratories (P) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)546

appeals, were granted statutory status with the insertion of Section 268A into the IT Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999. The second contention advanced by the learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee … 30,000 for reference before High Court and Rs. 60,000 for appeals to Supreme Court (Instruction Nos. 1573, dt. 12th July, 1984 and 1612, dt. 6th April, 1985). These guidelines should be adhered to, subject to the exceptions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2026

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … Notes dated 19.07.2008 for the previous year ending on 31.03.2008 and for the period from 01.04.2008 to June, 2008, sought Service Tax from the Plaintiff, at the rate of 12.36%. They informed the Plaintiff that renting of … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2009

Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-07-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245A, 245(2A), 245C, 245C(1), 245C(3), 245D, 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(2A), 245D(2B), 245D(2C), 245D(2D), 245D(4), 245D(4A), 245D(4A)(1), 45D(4A)(2A), 45D(4A)(2D), 245D(4A)(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245HA, 245HA(3), 245(I), 245(4), 246C, 245HA(1), 245HA(2), 245HA(3) and 254(2A); Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008 - Sections 273AA, 273AA(1), 273AA(3), 278AB, 278AB(1) and 278AB(3); Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 1975; Wealth-tax Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Central Excise Act - Sections 35C(2A); Income Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3617; (2009)225CTR(Bom)140; [2009]317ITR66(Bom); [2009]184TAXMAN400(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2009

Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its register ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 378; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65A, 65A(2), 66, 68(1) and 83; Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(3), 129C and 129D; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR369; 2009(111)BomLR1529; (2009)224CTR(Bom)197; [2009]17STJ255; 2009[14]STR289; [2009]19STT408; (2009)22VST293(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its registered office through Its Deputy Secretary and Mr. Badrinath Durvasula having his place of business Vs. Union of India (UOi) through Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Ministry of Finance Govt. of India and Ors. (23.03.2009 - BOMHC)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial