Advanced Search Results

Enercon (India) Ltd. and Others Vs. Enercon Gmbh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

buttress the said submission by referring to the clauses mentioned in the IPLA, regarding the grant of licences, finance, tenure of the IPLA; iv] That the patents in respect of which the licences were to be given … Mehras i.e. the Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 filed Company Petition No.74 of 2008 against the Respondent No.1, Dr.Wobben and Mr. H D Ketwigg alleging oppression … Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court reported in AIR 1966 Mysore 118 in the matter of Coffee Board, Bangalore v/s. Janab Dada Haji Ibrahim … came to be set aside, resulting in the Application filed under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 being allowed in terms of prayer clause 28(a) thereof, and the Injunction Application of the Petitioners above-named,

Dhanushkodi Vs. Renugopal

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

payable to Venkatasamy Naicker. One Lingappan, the elder son of the Venkatasamy Naicker was a partner in M/s.Renganathan Finance. The respondent in the year 1986, borrowed a sum of Rs.5,000/- and Rs.3,000/- from M/s.Renganathan Finance. In the … Amin Chand Payrelal] (ii) 1996 (I) CTC 613 [Meenakshisundaram Vs. N.Rengasami] (iii) 2008 (6) CTC 271 [K.Sivakami Vs. S.Krishnan] 10. Per contra, the learned counsel … not supported by consideration and having admitted the execution of promissory note, failed to rebut the presumption under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. (vi) Against the said judgment and decree, dated 07.08.1998 the respondent filed A.S.Nos.80

Rengarajan (Died) and Others Vs. Renugopal

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

payable to Venkatasamy Naicker. One Lingappan, the elder son of the Venkatasamy Naicker was a partner in M/s.Renganathan Finance. The respondent in the year 1986, borrowed a sum of Rs.5,000/- and Rs.3,000/- from M/s.Renganathan Finance. In the … Amin Chand Payrelal] (ii) 1996 (I) CTC 613 [Meenakshisundaram Vs. N.Rengasami] (iii) 2008 (6) CTC 271 [K.Sivakami Vs. S.Krishnan] 10. Per contra, the learned counsel … not supported by consideration and having admitted the execution of promissory note, failed to rebut the presumption under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. (vi) Against the said judgment and decree, dated 07.08.1998 the respondent filed A.S.Nos.79

Kerala State Insurance Department Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(2)KLT941; 2012(2)KHC683

the obligation as above and hence there is no 'taxable service', as contemplated under Section 65(12) of the Finance Act , 1994 to be mulcted with any liability. Still, the petitioner had submitted an application for registration and … The parties and proceedings are referred to, as arrayed in W.P.(C)No.15892 OF 2008, treating the same as the lead case. The case of the petitioner/State … undertakings owned wholly or mainly by the State Government or to such extent as clearly dealt with thereunder.14. Section 118 of the Insurance Act, 1938 also specifies the exemptions from the operation of the said Act, which in

Canoro Resources Limited Vs. Director of Income-tax (internat Ional Ta ...

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Subject : Land Acquisition

applicable to every firm is 30 per cent as per paragraph (c) of the First Schedule of the Finance Act, 2008. 10. 10.1 It is the common stand of both - the applicant and the Revenue, that the nature … Mr. A. Sinha M/s Canoro Resources Ltd. has filed this application under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The applicant is a foreign company, registered in Canada. 2.

Mr. Rajesh Bhalchandra Chalke Vs. M/S Emco Dynatorq Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act (NI) - Section 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 482, 252 ; Companies Act - Section 293; Constitution of India - Article 227; Amending Act - Sections 143 to 147

decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in Peacock Industries Ltd. and others vs M/s Budhrani Finance Ltd. and another, 2006 ALL MR CRI 2233, decided on 14th July 2006. Referring to the various guidelines … by the complainant to accused No.1 company by cheque dated 19th September 2008; that upon receipt of payment accused No.2 had sent certified copy of … trying such complaints.STATUTORY PROVISIONS18. Before dealing with the rival submissions, we may briefly note the relevant statutory provisions. Section 118 of the NI Act, which is on the statute book since 1881, provides as under :-"118. Presumptions as

Shri Manoj Aggarwal, Bemco Vs. Dcit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

it is submitted that the whole mater is procedural in nature; that Section 292BB recently inserted by the Finance Act, 2008 shows that any defect in such notice can be cured and is not fatal; that even otherwise the … were kept at the branch office at Ahmedabad and the books of the Delhi office were kept in 1182, Kucha Mahajani where a computer had also been shifted for the purpose of writing the accounts. He has

R (on the Application of Prudential Plc and Another) Vs. Special Commi ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Right to Information

of TMA have now been replaced by provisions contained in section 113 of, and Schedule 36 to, the Finance Act 2008 ("the 2008 Act"). While there are differences between the regime in TMA and that in the 2008 Act, … Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2005] 1 AC 610, quoted by Lord Sumption at para 118. But it is evident from paras 86 to 88 above that, when the present issue has been considered

Shri.m. Ratnavarma Padival Vs. Shri. Rathnavarma Ajri

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

NC:2023. KHC:30373 RSA No.1792 of 2013 No.111/1999), was admittedly employed by the plaintiff for some time in his finance firm. In the cross- examination, he has admitted that the cheque referred to by the plaintiff is encashed … Court in the case of KRISHNA JANARDHAN BHAT VS DATTATRAYA G. HEGDE, 2008 (6) KAR.L.J.538 (SC). The ratio laid down in the said case is … following substantial question of law:"Whether the First Appellate Court is justified in holding that the statutory presumption under Section 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is rebuttable, and the defendants have rebutted the said presumption by

M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-I a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

consideration before Their Lordships as to whether the following expressions in sub-clause (1), which was inserted by the Finance Act 2008 was clarificatory or declaratory in nature so as to have the retrospective effect. “Explanation - For the removal … the services in question are covered by “Supply of Tangible Goods for use” as has been defined under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”). It is … (Central), Delhi v. Harprasad and Co. P. Ltd . (1975 (99) ITR 118). This Court held with reference to the charging provisions of the statute