Advanced Search Results

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

permitted the goods into the zone. By virtue of Section 114(n) read with the 3rd Schedule to the Finance Act, 2007, Heading No. 11 of the Second Schedule - Export Tariff to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was … are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.2. Special Civil Application Nos. 9656 & 9713 of 2008 are filed by Domestic Tariff Area Units and goods are cleared to SEZ units under LUT/Bond and/ or

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … or bodies ................................................................................... 98 (ii) Statutory regulatory bodies/authorities .......................................................................................... 109 (iii) Trade Promotion bodies, councils, associations or organizations.................................................. 114 (iv) Non-statutory bodies - ERNET, NIXI and GS1 India ................................................................... 116 (v) State Cricket Associations.............................................................................................................. 122 (vi) Private

Shri Manoj Aggarwal, Bemco Vs. Dcit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

it is submitted that the whole mater is procedural in nature; that Section 292BB recently inserted by the Finance Act, 2008 shows that any defect in such notice can be cured and is not fatal; that even otherwise the

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Sheikh Shabbir Vs. Shaikh Yusuf

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 31, - (A) a loan, by a landlord to his tenant for financing of crops or seasonal finance, of not more than Rs.5 per acre of land held by the tenant; (B) a loan advanced to … Section 138, by ignoring statutory presumption to the contrary under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and Section 114 of the Evidence Act. The Apex Court further held that another interpretation of the proviso would defeat the

Sheikh Shabbir Vs. Shaikh Yusuf

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 31, - (A) a loan, by a landlord to his tenant for financing of crops or seasonal finance, of not more than Rs.5 per acre of land held by the tenant; (B) a loan advanced to … Section 138, by ignoring statutory presumption to the contrary under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and Section 114 of the Evidence Act. The Apex Court further held that another interpretation of the proviso would defeat the

Formula One World Championship Limited vs.commissioner of Income Tax, ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

then it would be open to the Assessing Officer to disallow such claim for deduction. Similarly, vide the Finance Act 2008, with effect from April 1, 2008, sub-section (6) has the Department W.P.(C) 10307/2016, W.P.(C) 9509/2016 & W.P.(C) 10145/2016 … contributions were in the nature of included services under Article 12 (4) (a) of the DTAA (see paragraph 114).13. In view of the aforesaid findings of the Tribunal that the main service rendered by the assessee to

Citizens United Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

since its announcement. Political speech is so ingrained in this country’s culture that speakers find ways around campaign finance laws. Rapid changes in technology-and the creative dynamic inherent in the concept of free expression-counsel against upholding a … speech may be banned based on the speaker’s corporate identity. In January 2008, appellant Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation, released a documentary (hereinafter Hillary ) … from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore 114 (2003) (“ Austin represents the first and only … March 24, 2009-Reargued September 9, 2009--Decided January 21, 2010 As amended by §203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), federal law prohibits corporations and unions from using their general treasury funds to make independent … name shortly before a primary and contained pejorative references to her candidacy. Section 311 disclaimers provide information to the electorate, McConnell, supra, at 196, and

Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2020) 8 SCC129; [2020] 3 SCR 1

with income tax only. 26.2. The position of law and the rights accrued prior to enactment of the Finance Act, 2004 have to be taken into account, particularly when the position becomes irreversible. 26.3. The provisions of Section … in the spirit behind what is saved under Section 6 (of the General Clauses Act) as provided in Section 114 of the Act of 2013 and 113 the non-obstante clause in Section 24(2).125. It was also submitted on

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court in the case of Rojer Mathew (supra) considered the question, as to whether Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017, which does not prescribe qualifications, appointment, term and conditions of service, salary and allowances, etc. suffers from … in character and extremely wide. A parallel power of subordinate legislation is conferred to the Central Government under Section 114(1) and (2) of the Act. But Section 114(3) however makes it incumbent upon the Central Government to place