Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 section 100 · Page 1 of about 5,759 results (0.074 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 20 2014

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-20-2014

Subject : Service Tax

and ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2008. 36 In view of paragraph no.30 above, upholding the validity of Section 65(105)(zzzz) and 65(90-a) of the Finance … and on account of policy decision, it was entrusted to IRCTC and the Ministry of Railways is having 100% shares in the said Corporation and it is also a Government company; there was change of policy once

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2012

M/S. Suzlon Infrastructure Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune.ii ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-14-2012

Subject : Service Tax

of service tax under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning or Installation service’ as defined in Sec,65(39a) of the Finance Act, 1994, the officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI), New Delhi conducted investigation into the matter. … Nicco Corporation Ltd. vs. CCE, Calcutta - 2006(203)ELT 362(S.C) and (2) Skytone Electricals (India) Ltd. vs. Commissioner - 2008 (225) ELT A 97 (S.C) . 10.3 We have gone through the judgments. In both the judgments, the … to impose penalty on it under Sec.76 for contravention of provisions of Section 68 and penalty under Section 78 of Chapter V of the Finance … interest. In addition, the Commissioner also imposed a penalty @ of Rs. 100/- per day from the date it is payable till the date it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2009

Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-07-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245A, 245(2A), 245C, 245C(1), 245C(3), 245D, 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(2A), 245D(2B), 245D(2C), 245D(2D), 245D(4), 245D(4A), 245D(4A)(1), 45D(4A)(2A), 45D(4A)(2D), 245D(4A)(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245HA, 245HA(3), 245(I), 245(4), 246C, 245HA(1), 245HA(2), 245HA(3) and 254(2A); Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008 - Sections 273AA, 273AA(1), 273AA(3), 278AB, 278AB(1) and 278AB(3); Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 1975; Wealth-tax Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Central Excise Act - Sections 35C(2A); Income Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3617; (2009)225CTR(Bom)140; [2009]317ITR66(Bom); [2009]184TAXMAN400(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 18 2015

Hamdard Laboratories India and Another Vs. Assistant Director of Incom ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2015

Subject : Education

of Hamdard's objects prior to 01.04.2009 is concerned. In light of the amendment to Section 2(15) introduced by Finance Act, 2008, the revenue argues that Hamdard ceases to be a charitable organisation with effect from 01.04.2009 and cites it … amendments thereto, or elsewhere, are abrogated, annulled and deleted therefrom and the Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) is 64/64 or 100% Charitable Wakf and there is no Khandani Income whatsoever and no private beneficiary whomsoever. ? 74. The Revenue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

Matched in: Citation (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2009

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-2009

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

vires the Constitution of India. The impugned provision which was brought on to the statute book by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from (w.r.e.f.) 01.04.1989, has resulted in a grievance in so far as the petitioners/assessees are … petitioner imposed a penalty of Rs 18,79,303/- at the minimum rate of 100% of tax evaded. Being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal to the … Rajiv Shakdher, J1. The captioned writ petitions lay challenge to the provisions of Section 271(1B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the =Act) on the ground that it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … dying fabrics and other such machines. The assessee was denied benefit of 100% exemption on the ground that the machines imported by them were not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Oscar Laboratories (P) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)546

appeals, were granted statutory status with the insertion of Section 268A into the IT Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999. The second contention advanced by the learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee … the Instruction dt. 27th March, 2000, read with Section 268A of the 1961 Act. Ordered accordingly. - Sections 100-A [As inserted by Act 22 of 2002], 110 & 104 & Letters Patent, 1865, Clause 10: [Dr. B.S.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2016

Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-05-2016

Subject : Education

(i) Section 201 provides for consequences of failure to deduct tax. The said Section 201 was amended by Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 01/06/2002 wherein the proceedings were to be initiated within reasonable period of time. Subsequently

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2008

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial