Advanced Search Results

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

vires the Constitution of India. The impugned provision which was brought on to the statute book by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from (w.r.e.f.) 01.04.1989, has resulted in a grievance in so far as the petitioners/assessees are … expression =without reasonable cause was also omitted with respect to other provisions under which penalty was leviable under Chapter XXI, such as, Sections 270 (the expression omitted was =without reasonable excuse as against =without reasonable cause), 271A, … claim of the petitioner that by virtue of the provisions of Article 8 of DTAA the profits from both the activities described hereinabove, were not

M/S.Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. Vs. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Sub-section 1, the second proviso to Sub-section 3; Sub-section 11 and Sub-section 12 of Section 2 of the Finance Act, 2008, which provides as follows:“(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2) and (3).for the assessment year commencing on … in Part I of the FiRs.Schedule and such tax as reduced by the rebate of income-tax calculated under Chapter VIII-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) (hereinafter referred to as the Income-tax Act) shall be

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … in providing output service. Subsequently, information about use of the goods and Chapter heading under the Central Excise tariff was called for from the appellant. … The same was, thereafter, furnished by the appellant vide its letter dated 8.3.2006. It was, alleged that the appellant had suppressed material facts and knowingly,

intercontinental Consultants and Technorats Pvt. L Vs. U.O.i. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

said rule is ultra vires of the provisions of Section 66 and 67 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994.2. The petitioner is a company providing consulting engineering services. It specialises in highways, structures, airports, urban and … Rate of Service Tax Service Tax Payable Service Tax Edu. Cess Total 99,42,433/- 5% 4,97,122/- - 4,97,122/- 4,87,83,282/- 8% 39,02,662/- - 39,02,662/- 13,22,66,980/- 10.2% 1,32,26,698/- 2,64,534/- 1,34,91,232/- 14,45,23,874/- 12.24% 1,73,42,865/- 3,46,857/- 1,76,89,722/- 33,55,16,569/- 3,49,69,347/- 6,11,391/- 3,55,80,738/- *(Note:

M/s.Zoho corporation Private Limited Vs The Deputy commissioner of Inc ...

Court : Chennai

in financial year 2016-17 and INR 550 crore in financial year 2017-18.4. An equalization levy was introduced under Chapter VIII of the FinanceAct, 2016, in relation to the provision of online advertising services by a non- resident to … nature that are included in any of the above”. In spite of said recommendation by the Committee, the Finance Act did not include reimbursement within the scope of specified service, thereby indicating the legislative intent to not tax

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

the fact, that broadcasting was subjected to tax liability as a 'service' for the first time under the Finance Act, 2001. Chapter V. of the Finance Act, 2001 bears the heading 'Service Tax'. Section 65(13) of the Finance … company by filing Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2562 of 2007, and thereafter, Writ Petition (M/S) No. 353 of 2008.7. The principal contention on behalf the petitioner, while assailing the action of the District Magistrates, in demanding entertainment … legislative competence of the State Legislature and is fully covered by Entry 8 read with Entry 6 of List II, it is not necessary for

Shree Choudhary Transport Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

tax within prescribed time. In fact, even before the year 2010, the said proviso was amended by the Finance Act 2008 and that amendment of the year 2008 was provided retrospective operation by the legislature itself. For ready reference, … to a contractor or subcontractor for carrying out any work on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or, after deduction, has not been paid during the previous … when no payment exceeded Rs. 20,000/-, the CIT(A) 6 ‘CIT(A)’ for short 8 found that the appellant had, for its convenience and to avoid the

Maxopp Investment Ltd and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A, 14A; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 8D; Finance Act, 2002

the total income?2. Whether the provisions of sub-section (2) and sub-section (3) of section 14A inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from 01/04/2007, would apply retrospectively to all pending proceedings?3. Whether Rule 8D inserted by the … would apply retrospectively to all pending proceedings?3. Whether Rule 8D inserted by the Income -tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2008 with effect from 24/03/2008 was procedural in nature and hence would apply retrospectively to all pending proceedings?3. In … income .14A. For the purposes of computing the total income under this Chapter, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the … at 10% of the dividend income and sustained the addition of Rs 8,18,743/- only. The revenue is aggrieved by the fact that the entire expenditure

Union of India & Others versus Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.756; (2025) 5 SCC 906

Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Finance Act, 2008; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Contract Act, 1872. [2025] 2 S.C.R. 759 Union of India & Others v. Future … stated chronologically. History of this controversy: 3. The Parliament introduced service tax through the Finance Act, 1994 under Chapter V, which took effect on 01.07.1994. Later, through the Finance Act, 2003, the Finance Act,1994 was amended to … 18.1, 18.3, 18.4-18.7, 19] Case Law Cited K. Arumugam v. UOI [2024] 8 SCR 830 : 2024 SCC Online SC 2278 - relied on. Union