Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2008 chapter 1 · Page 1 of about 1,569 results (0.085 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 24 2009

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-2009

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

vires the Constitution of India. The impugned provision which was brought on to the statute book by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from (w.r.e.f.) 01.04.1989, has resulted in a grievance in so far as the petitioners/assessees are … expression =without reasonable cause was also omitted with respect to other provisions under which penalty was leviable under Chapter XXI, such as, Sections 270 (the expression omitted was =without reasonable excuse as against =without reasonable cause), 271A, … challenge to the provisions of Section 271(1B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the =Act) on the ground that it is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Oscar Laboratories (P) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)546

appeals, were granted statutory status with the insertion of Section 268A into the IT Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999. The second contention advanced by the learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee … special order for reasons to be specified therein, relax any requirement contained in any of the provisions of Chapter IV or Chapter VI-A, where the assessee has failed to comply with any requirement specified in such provision … J.S. Khehar, J.1. The respondent-assessee submitted a return for the asst. yr. 1988-89, declaring its income at Rs. 76,257, on 6th Feb., 1990. The AO

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2016

M/S.Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. Vs. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-12-2016

Subject : Direct Taxation

Sub-section 1, the second proviso to Sub-section 3; Sub-section 11 and Sub-section 12 of Section 2 of the Finance Act, 2008, which provides as follows:“(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2) and (3).for the assessment year commencing on … in Part I of the FiRs.Schedule and such tax as reduced by the rebate of income-tax calculated under Chapter VIII-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) (hereinafter referred to as the Income-tax Act) shall be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 07 2009

Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-07-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245A, 245(2A), 245C, 245C(1), 245C(3), 245D, 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(2A), 245D(2B), 245D(2C), 245D(2D), 245D(4), 245D(4A), 245D(4A)(1), 45D(4A)(2A), 45D(4A)(2D), 245D(4A)(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245HA, 245HA(3), 245(I), 245(4), 246C, 245HA(1), 245HA(2), 245HA(3) and 254(2A); Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008 - Sections 273AA, 273AA(1), 273AA(3), 278AB, 278AB(1) and 278AB(3); Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 1975; Wealth-tax Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Central Excise Act - Sections 35C(2A); Income Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3617; (2009)225CTR(Bom)140; [2009]317ITR66(Bom); [2009]184TAXMAN400(Bom)

by him in the course of the proceedings before him.7. Section 273AA and 278AB which were inserted by Finance Act 2008 with effect from 1st April, 2008 are also relevant for our discussion. The relevant portions of Section 273AA(1) … from 1st June, 2007 as being ultra vires and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.2. Chapter XIX-A was inserted in the Act by Taxation Law Amendment Act, 1975 with effect from 1st April, 1976.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2008

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 2005 three further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was … in providing output service. Subsequently, information about use of the goods and Chapter heading under the Central Excise tariff was called for from the appellant. … Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of the Customs, Excise

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2025

Union of India & Others versus Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-11-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.756; (2025) 5 SCC 906

Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Finance Act, 2008; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Contract Act, 1872. [2025] 2 S.C.R. 759 Union of India & Others v. Future … stated chronologically. History of this controversy: 3. The Parliament introduced service tax through the Finance Act, 1994 under Chapter V, which took effect on 01.07.1994. Later, through the Finance Act, 2003, the Finance Act,1994 was amended to … [2025] 2 S.C.R. 756 : 2025 INSC 181 Union of India & Others v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd. &

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2010

Sify Technologies Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service T ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Nov-08-2010

Subject : Service Tax

transaction of taxable service is with any associated enterprise.” (emphasis supplied) 4. By the amendment introduced in the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 10.5.08, service tax in respect of transactions between associate enterprises was required to be paid as soon … - SECTION [67. Valuation of taxable services for charging service tax. “(1) Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, where service tax is chargeable on any taxable service with reference to its value, then such value shall,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Central Vs. Anil Hastkala (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-13-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Raj)417; [2010]186TAXMAN365(Raj)

tried to convince that once orders of settlement commission are not legally sustainable as per amendment made under Finance Act, 2007 being enforced w.e.f. 01/06/07, proceedings stand abated in terms of Section 245-HA as a consequence whereof, matter … Commission has till 26/03/2008 received more than 324 orders from various High courts in the month of March, 2008, directing the Principal Bench to complete the cases by 31/03/2008.4. This would involve more than 1500 assessments. The … law or to the assessing authority in view of proceedings initiated under Chapter-XIX-A on being held to be abated in terms of Section 245HA of … impugned order of Settlement commission Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) is held to be legally unsustainable, in such an eventuality, whether

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

Matched in: Citation (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial