Advanced Search Results

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

Special Economic Zone were enacted by Act 20 of 2002 effective from 11-5-2002 and have been omitted vide Section 99 of the Finance Act, 2007 with effect from 11-5-2007. Section 76B as was operative during the above mentioned … permitted the goods into the zone. By virtue of Section 114(n) read with the 3rd Schedule to the Finance Act, 2007, Heading No. 11 of the Second Schedule - Export Tariff to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted

Chandi Ram and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(P& H)113; [2009]312ITR139(P& H)

45(5) of the Act and Sub-section (16) of Section 155 of the Act, which were inserted by the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1st April, 2004, was considered. However, both these provisions have been taken into consideration by the … by this Court in IT Appeal No. 695 of 2005 (CIT v. Prem Singh, decided on 16th May, 2007), while observing as under:At the outset, learned Counsel for the assessee contended that the question of law raised

M/S.Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income ...

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Subject : Direct Taxation

Matched in: Advocate Present for the Applicant Mr. Pradeep Dinodia, FCA Mr. D.S.Ahluwalia, GM, REC Mr. Rakesh Sareen, DGM(Finance)REC Mr. Murlidharan, CM(FandA), REC Present for the Department Mr. S.D.Kapila, Advocate.

Dollar Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

down the provisions of Rule 2(1)(d)(xii) and (xvii) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 as ultra vires the Finance Act, 1994, in the case of Laghu Udyog Bharti and Anr. v. Union of India, the appellants claimed refund … this Tribunal's decision in Commissioner v. DCW Ltd. 2006 (1) STR 298 (Tri.-Chennai) and Commissioner v. Orient Cements 2007 (7) STR 649 (Tri.-Bang.). Para-4 of the Tribunal's order in DCW case is reproduced below: 4. After giving … the aforesaid provisions struck down by the apex court and amending certain sections of the Finance Act, 1994, they repaid an amount of Rs. 54,230/- … 1. The appellants had paid service tax of Rs. 99,405/- for the period 16.7.97 to 31.7.99 in respect of Clearing & Forwarding

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … Appeal No.57/2012 dated 23.04.2014, (8) The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v/s Union of India reported in 2007(7) STR 625 (SC), (9) The Commissioner of Inland Revenue v/s Databank Systems Limited in Privy Council Appeal No.39/1989

intercontinental Consultants and Technorats Pvt. L Vs. U.O.i. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

said rule is ultra vires of the provisions of Section 66 and 67 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994.2. The petitioner is a company providing consulting engineering services. It specialises in highways, structures, airports, urban and … to March06* April06 to March07 Total Rate of Service Tax Service Tax Payable Service Tax Edu. Cess Total 99,42,433/- 5% 4,97,122/- - 4,97,122/- 4,87,83,282/- 8% 39,02,662/- - 39,02,662/- 13,22,66,980/- 10.2% 1,32,26,698/- 2,64,534/- 1,34,91,232/- 14,45,23,874/- 12.24% 1,73,42,865/- 3,46,857/-

American Hotel and Lodging Association Educational Institute Vs. Centr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20A), 10(22), 10(22B), 10(23C), 11, 11(1), 11(5), 12, 12AA, 13, 60 to 63 and 245Q(1); Finance Act, 2001; Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 2007; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 2CA

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(SC)377; [2008]301ITR86(SC); JT2008(6)SC379; 2008(7)SCALE588; (2008)10SCC509; 2008AIRSCW4996

Inserted by Finance Act, 2001, w.e.f. 1.4.20013 Inserted by the Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.20034 Inserted by the Finance Act, 2007, w.e.f. 1.6.2007 Direct Taxation - Income Tax - Exemption of income tax to educational institutions - Scope of … in this civil appeal is as to what is the scope of enquiry by the Prescribed Authority under Section 10(23C)(vi) read with the third proviso thereto inserted by Finance Act, 1998 w.e.f. 1.4.1999. In this case, Central

Malad Kokil Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another Vs. the Mode ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Reserve Bank of India v/s. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and ors. {AIR 1987 SCC 1023}, the Court will have to draw a distinction … prepared a note stating therein that the said orders dated 23rd April, 2007 are not applicable to the facts of the present case. It is … It is the contention of the plaintiff-society that after they pursued the matter under the Right to Information Act, they came to know about the Commencement Certificate granted in favour of the defendants by the Corporation on … in the property within the period mentioned in the agreement executed under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as

N. Meenakshi Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 16A(1), 16A(2), 16A(3), 16A(4), 16A(5), 16A(6), 48, 50C, 50C(2), 55A, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 129, 142A, 142(2A), 143(3), 147, 153, 153(1), 153(3), 142, 245C, 245D(1), 245R(3), 245Q(1), 246A, 250, 254, 260, 262, 263 and 264; Indian Stamp Act - Sections 47A; Finance Act, 2006; Finance Act, 2007; Wealth-tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16A, 23A, 24, 34AA, 35, 37 and 38A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Mad)625

and the periods of limitation are varied by insertion through Finance Act, 2006 with effect from 1.6.2006 and Finance Act, 2007 with effect from 1.6.2007. However, Section 153(3) of the Act exempts the said period of limitation in certain … decided to sell the property to the Indian Oil Corporation, after negotiation, fixed the sale consideration at Rs. 99 Lakhs. Pursuant to the agreement, a sale deed was executed in favour of the Indian Oil Corporation. Since

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kikani Exports Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

and the periods of limitation are varied by insertion through Finance Act, 2006 with effect from 1.6.2006 and Finance Act, 2007 with effect from 1.6.2007. However, Section 153(3) of the Act exempts the said period of limitation in certain