Advanced Search Results

Piyare Lal Hari Singh Builders Pvt Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

of the powers under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioners in these writ petitions challenge the said instruction on the ground that it is contrary … service can opt to pay service tax under Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007. As per the composition scheme, the service provider was having an option to pay 2% of the gross … also be mentioned that at that point of time neither was Rule 5B of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 in effect nor was Section 67A

Vistar Construction (P) Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

of the powers under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioners in these writ petitions challenge the said instruction on the ground that it is contrary … service can opt to pay service tax under Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007. As per the composition scheme, the service provider was having an option to pay 2% of the gross … also be mentioned that at that point of time neither was Rule 5B of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 in effect nor was Section 67A

M/s. Vedanta Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

filed by the appellant to modify the Miscellaneous Order No.40855/2015, dated 29.5.2015, disposing of an application presented under Section 5B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. C.M.A.No.2428 of 2015: … Appeal filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable in terms of Section 83 of Finance Act, 1944, against the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at … report like balance sheet, profit and loss account etc., for the year 2007-2008, the paid up share capital had increased by 30 crores due to

Lucknow Nagar Nigam Vs. Kohli Brothers Colour Lab Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

in, or any benefit arising out of, such property vested in him under this Act.10.5 Section 5A and Section 5B were inserted with retrospective effect from 07.01.2016 and 10.07.1968 by Act 3 of 2017. They read as under: … provision of aid and comfort to the enemy, for instance, through the making available of funds for war financing. Enemy property can be disposed of by various means including custodianship, liquidation, expropriation, confiscation or nationalization. The means

M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Section 10 (1) ; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - International Airport Authority Act, 1971 ; National Airport Authority Act, 1985. ; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Section 5A; Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 - ; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - section 3 ; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 - section 3A; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - section 5A, B; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - section 3; ompanies Act, 1956 ; Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 - Section 3; Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 - section 3; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963 - section

under section 5A of the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 (9 of 1948), or [the Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956)] or the Employees' … judgment of the High Court of Delhi delivered in LPA No.38 of 2007, LPA No.1065 of 2007, Writ Petition (C) No.139 of 2008 and Writ … 1948), or the Central Board of Trustees and the State Boards of Trustees constituted under section 5A and section 5B, respectively, of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or the Life Insurance

Regania Hotels and Resors Pvt. Ltd. Vs.delhi Tourism and Transportatio ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Supreme Court ARB. P. No.213/2018 Page 10 of 25 rendered in Datar Switchgears Ltd. vs. Tata Finance Ltd. and Anr., (2000) 8 SCC151 (v) In any event, since, the Managing Director (in short “M.D.”) of … in National Agricultural Coop. Marketing Federation India Ltd. vs. Gains Trading Ltd., 2007 (5) SCC692and judgment rendered by this Court on 19.1.2015, in Arb. P. … 5A, or (c) the demolition of any building or other structure made, or ordered to be made, under section 5B, or [(cc) the sealing of any erection or work or of any public premises under section 5C, or]. … is a petition preferred under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short “1996 Act”). The petitioner’s prayer for appointment of an

Mrf Limited. Vs.metro Tyres Limited.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

such a concept. It is well established that the producer is the kingpin who invests substantive money, raises finance through institution, utilizes persons/expertise and brings out a product i.e. film. He takes such initiative and responsibility for … emphasised that in Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited Vs. Gajender Singh and Others, 2007 SCC OnLine Bom. 920 the Bombay High Court has held that the … recording…‖ A film in India is therefore a ‗work of recording‘ as opposed to a mere ‗recording‘ under Section 5B of the UK Act, 1988. Consequently, while the Indian definition is wider and more robust, the definition and

Yoshio Kubo Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

virtue of Section 10(10CC), introduced and brought into force in the Statute with effect from 01.04.2002 by the Finance Act, 2003, they were not liable to pay tax on such amounts which constituted the income tax component paid

The Great Eastern Shipping vs Union of India,

Court : Chennai

and subsequently retrospective exemption has been provided for the period 1-3-2011 to 16-3-2011 vide clause 129 of the Finance Act, 2012, the requirement for filing IGM and Bill of Entry may be insisted in all such cases w.e.f. … and ‘Jag Rani’ both of which arrived at Indian port,i.e., Paradeep for the first time on 13th November, 2007 and 26 August, 2011 respectively. th Both these vessels have been converted several times from coastal run status … - 110 001. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Group - 5A & 5B), having his office at Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 … by the 1est respondent, is illegal and unconstitutional as being violative of section(s) 12,25 and 46 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Articles 14,19(1)(g),265 and

Davis Vs. Federal Election Comm’n

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

U. S. 1 , the Court soundly rejected a cap on a candidate’s expenditure of personal funds to finance campaign speech, holding that a “candidate … has a First Amendment right to … vigorously and tirelessly … … Davis v. Federal Election Comm창™n - 07-320 (2008) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2007 DAVIS V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM'N SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DAVIS … Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, Mar. 27, 2008, p. 5B). As a result, we are satisfied that Davis’ … equally to all competitors for a seat and their authorized committees. However, §319(a) of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), 2 U. S. C. §441a-1(a), part of the so-called “Millionaire’s Amendment,” fundamentally alters this scheme … §319 is unconstitutional and an injunction preventing the FEC from enforcing the section during the 2006 election. The District Court concluded sU. S.onte that Davis